Recent comments in /f/worldnews

Lintashi t1_jdw9zce wrote

France is not in the state of war or conflict. There is no reason for refugees and asylum seekers to illegally cross from France to Britain because their lives are not endangered by being in France or other european country. If they want to travel, they can do it legally. Otherwise, they are committing a crime and should be treated as criminals.

12

6bb26ec559294f7f t1_jdw8u1z wrote

> Doctors are bad because their existence incentivizes people to take risks they might shy away from if there were no doctors.

I haven't seen any seriously make this argument for doctors because they are too far removed from decision making, but it is a discussion when adding new safety features to a dangerous activity. If the new safety feature encourages more dangerous behavior, then the safety needs to be worth the increase in dangerous behavior. Generally it is. Sometimes it isn't but it is added for legal/liability reasons; that's another case of perverse incentives.

1

autotldr t1_jdw896q wrote

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 66%. (I'm a bot)


> A new immigration bill in the UK that aims to stop migrants crossing the Channel illegally on small boats from France is "Incompatible" with Britain's international obligations, Europe's top rights body said on Monday.

> In a letter addressed to both chambers of the UK parliament, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Dunja Mijatovic, urged lawmakers to vote against the bill proposed by British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Conservative government.

> If passed, the bill would "Add to the already significant regression of the protection of the human rights" of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants in the UK and "Provide an incentive" to other states in Europe and beyond to adopt similar measures, she said.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Sunak^#1 bill^#2 rights^#3 Conservative^#4 government^#5

−1

Zekrom16 t1_jdw74ua wrote

I am going by the Freedom house freedom ranking there it's closer to eastern European countries and much better than Sri Lanka , Ukraine etc. Which are actually under the threat of going to Russia levels cause they are in economic crisis/wars.

Russia has never been a democratic since the collapse of Ussr in 1991. Saying a country which has been a democracy for 75+ years is suddenly gonna collapse to Russia levels is insane and that too without any crisis or wars.

I agree that India always had a problem with freedom of press and overreaching laws but saying it's gonna go strongly in any direction is not logical. Indian democracy will do little movements in any side thus making claims that there is a trend or anything is not logical.

I agree that India needs to take actions but I will disagree with you on sudden downturns and Russia comparison.

6

Torugu t1_jdw6p6d wrote

Or maybe educated, responsible people with access to birth control choose to have fewer children later instead of popping out their first baby at 21. Which is great for the educated responsible people, but terrible for the long-term future of the country.

As a matter of fact, Germany has some of the strongest benefits for young parents in the world, to the extend where many people move back to Germany just to have children.

17

Living-Walrus-2215 t1_jdw5v9a wrote

>sovereignty

>noun

>Supremacy of authority or rule as exercised by a sovereign or sovereign state.

>Royal rank, authority, or power.

>Complete independence and self-government.

What this means is that Russia (and any other sovereign nation) has full power in relation to itself. The ICC has no more power or rights over it than some random farmer in Rwanda who never even heard of Russia.

The ICC (and any other court) has no jurisdiction over Russia (or any other country) other than whichever jurisdiction those countries allow it, to the extent they are allowing, and for as long as they are allowing.

It doesn't matter if Ukraine (or every single other person in the world that has ever existed or ever will exist) agrees that the ICC has jurisdiction because Russia does not, and when it comes to sovereign nations that is all it matters.

0

Command0Dude t1_jdw5rtm wrote

Absolutely maddening that far right wingers in many countries can try to ram through wildly unpopular legislation or other chicanery but when time comes for election they either win or very narrowly lose because people just don't turn out to actually vote.

"Voting doesn't matter" is the greatest psyop of the 21st century. Whoever came up with this media campaign to encourage voter apathy is an evil genius.

19

JPR_FI t1_jdw5hkf wrote

Seriously; small threats ? Small things like freedom of press (150/180) and flagrant violations of human rights reported by all organizations ? These are major things that democracy cannot survive with indefinitely as seen in Russia recently. Democracy is more than free elections one has to also abide by democratic values.

−2