Those countries willingly choose to peg their currency. You’re acting like France forced them to at gunpoint

People keep saying this but have only pointed towards naval answers which are incidental because they are more worried about missiles. There is no comprehensive anti-UAS platform, just a lot of conventional AAA weapons. You don't want single shot overkill weapons for cheap kamikaze drones.

Which countries in Africa do they have a disapproval record with? Be specific

Because men are treated as disposable in media, you all should already know this.

I Believe this was all about some property that she was going to sell or sold… family went ape sh… t over it… now, just because of their temper tantrum, you have no property, you’re jailed and given either death or life in prison.. SMH

How young are you that you didn't grow up learning about the possibility of a nuclear winter?

Yeah, I could look just as Korean as that guy! I’m a Hispanic woman but I could

[removed]

> would cause a level of global famine that would bring every country on the planet to its knees,

No, it would not. Even 10 thousand nukes in a WW3 scenario wouldn't effect parts of South America at all.

> I meant more the collapse of everything that we currently rely on to survive.

Then why are you doubling down when that's not what you said?

give belarusians guns, and they will give lukashenko a civil war, he knows this, will not happen

My man. I'd do it too but I'm not getting laid anyways and hands can't get pregnant

I mean there are not many examples of high-tech militaries dealing with significant drone attacks because we haven't seen WW3. Jamming is only effective against commercial drones.

US military has placed countering UAS as a priority, they do not have a coordinated strategy on dealing with them. US still relies on conventional AAA to deal with drones. Every different theater would need many different answers as it currently stands, which is not a problem for the enemy just mass-producing cheap kamikaze drones.

> You think 100 nukes won’t end the world?

Yes.

> Where the fuck do you live in la la land and how is the weather?

Ah attacking the poster and not the content. Classic shit poster.

> would not end the world as we know it.

What are you talking about? We are talking about ending the world, not 'as we know it'.

Did you reply to the correct post?

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 84%. (I'm a bot)

> Drug retailers in Pakistan revealed that insulin, Disprin, Calpol, Tegral, Nimesulide, Hepamerz, Buscopan and Rivotril, are among the common and important drugs that are in shortage in the country.

> The present financial crisis in Pakistan has hit the healthcare system, leaving patients struggling for essential medicines.

> Almost 95 per cent of the drugs manufactured in Pakistan require raw materials which are imported from other nations, including India and China.

Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Drug^#1 Pakistan^#2 medicine^#3 import^#4 country^#5

Oh that's a very good point actually!

I was only thinking of what it might achieve for France, rather than how it might benefit Macron domestically.

We have 10's of thousands of nukes and it's not enough to end the world.

You are ignorant.

It is for domestic purposes. With all due respect, this guy is definitely into show man politics. I thought he was going to kiss Zelensky last time they met.

We can if we work together. The question is will the majority join?

Are we really acting like France doesn’t intentionally support those types? The CFA system promoted by France is also not in the best interest of the African participants.

What you’ve said is very much true, but this is very much a two sided issue with both parties not being good faith actors. The fact some of those African players are looking elsewhere after literally centuries depending on the country speaks volumes. If the relationships were that mutually beneficial there’d be no reason for them to look to Russia or China after all that time.

Can’t wait for the 100 page report from US intelligence detailing how the weapons are being hidden, transported, received. Satellite photos of shipments, what part of Ukraine they’re being used in etc.

For all it’s faults, US intelligence is rarely if ever wrong. If they say China is seriously considering it, than they are or were.

Everybody in the US is in economic wars with each other, the EU, and every body else.

It's called capitalism and the war is competition.

That they are mosad?

Destroy evidence?

Maybe India could give Pakistan some generic medicines to help forge closer ties

"partisan" is the word you use when you don't want to say "anarchist"