Recent comments in /f/washingtondc

LilJonPaulSartre t1_j8sbyqd wrote

This is not true. There are virtually no public spaces where it is illegal to film/photograph in the United States. It's First Amendment protected activity. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in any public space, or most spaces readily visible from public spaces (i.e. seen without obstruction from a public sidewalk, etc.)

That said, his other speech could very well constitute sexual harassment, so it bears being reported. But simply filming in public is in no way illegal, and you do not need consent to do so.

Please don't give bad information confidently stated as fact. It makes life harder for people who legitimately film/photograph in public.

13

Gumburcules t1_j8s9g51 wrote

> Trump wanted to move entire agencies thousands of miles to reduce headcount.

Well yeah, but the goal of reducing headcount wasn't because we couldn't afford to keep them employed, it was to force all the competent people who could get other jobs to leave so that the agencies would be crippled and unable to provide oversight, enforce regulations, or distribute services to the "wrong people."

3

Gumburcules t1_j8s8ixz wrote

> My on campus day is 90% shooting the sh*t with everyone who's in.

I'm 100% convinced that despite "productivity" being the ostensible reason for returning to the office the actual reason is that the higher-ups who make the decisions miss their office shit shooting, business lunches, and escape time from their spoiled kids and loveless marriages.

2

thebenron t1_j8s5go3 wrote

It vacillates wildly.

I made comments in the thread on the cop convicted of killing Karon Hylton-Brown saying that statements made by cops about the people they shoot should not be taken as fact that was well received, but when I said essentially the same thing about MPD shooting someone this week, it was downvoted into oblivion.

I think people just really have a hard time maintaining a coherent understanding of what policing is, because it's so much easier to believe the comforting lie that is hammered into our brains about it.

15

BigLeagueBanker69 t1_j8s5900 wrote

Ugh. Can we try to get something on the legislative agenda surrounding privacy rights and prohibiting people from doing this?

It's just one of those things that feels like shouldn't be legal but technically is because the technology that enables it came to fruition quicker than updates to laws do.

5

phaerus t1_j8s4mbt wrote

It depends where your property line is. Generally (IANAL), if it's not a structure, you can do what you want on your property. However, DC controls everything from the street to the property line, which is often a lot more than you'd think: >"Public Space is defined as all the publicly owned property between the property lines on a street and includes, but is not limited to, the roadway, tree spaces, sidewalks, and alleys.

You may find some helpful information here: https://ddot.dc.gov/service/public-space-management

It appears that there's a $0 permit [1] for " The pruning of street trees, the planting or removal of trees or the planting of hedges on public space." that may apply to what you're talking about, called "Rain Garden (S.F. Home Yard Area)"

If you touch the "Tree Space," Requirements are laid out in DC 24-109[2], but I can't seem to find anything else about non-tree-space areas.

Unrelated to your question, did you use a kit for your raised bed? I'm thinking about doing the same this year and just looking into what it would take!

[1] https://tops.ddot.dc.gov/DDOTPermitSystem/DDOTPermitOnline/PermitTypes.aspx [2] https://www.dcregs.dc.gov/Common/DCMR/SectionList.aspx?SectionNumber=24-109

2