Recent comments in /f/washingtondc

BourbonCoug t1_j8qsocs wrote

>You lose out on spurious connections because the other people are hybrid on different days.

This. This so much! What good is it for me to be in the office if the people that I would need or want to work with in-person aren't there on my dedicated day? Why go if just to attend virtual meetings?

Also doesn't help that a lot of spaces aren't designed well to foster the collaboration one might want on a hybrid schedule. No, I don't want an entirely open office floor plan, but the cubicle farm isn't any better in 2023.

4

MarkinDC24 t1_j8qpe12 wrote

I understand and agree with you. What you might not understand, is there are some of us who are aware of this clear guidance/legal direction not being followed. So, yes, there are much more than “zero” federal employees who are teleworking outside of the region (I.e. National Capital Region) and getting paid non-regional D.C. area locality pay. Please. Do. Not. Shoot the messenger!

3

MarkinDC24 t1_j8qp3th wrote

I am describing entrenched and systemic issues. Agencies have long used highly “creative” interpretations of legal statues. I am also pointing out a lack of oversight by OPM. These two phenomena are not exclusive to any one administration, they are two highly systematic problems that is highly entrenched. Review the PLUM and see how many political appointees manage government, who are often ignorant of the law or find creative ways to skirt around it! OPM doesn’t do much auditing, so problem become highly probable and/or entrenched.

1

MarkinDC24 t1_j8qoj6l wrote

Ah, yes, OPM was so helpful in this article right? Standard comms. 101 boiler plate responses. Suggesting media refer to their official report on telework. Honest question: Is OPM auditing agencies Telework Managing Officer’s agency data around Telework, as it is stipulated in the Telework Enhancement Act of 2010?

1

MarkinDC24 t1_j8qo4et wrote

Government agencies have siloed communication. In some cases, agencies follow legal and/or OPM guidance strictly. In other cases, agencies use creative license to wiggle around legal/regulatory guidance. It is only a matter of time, before agencies start to compare what each other are doing. It would seem, agencies are accelerating their conversations around telework, and some agencies disingenuous use of telework locality determinations is only “just” being noticed.

1

Codasco t1_j8q938n wrote

Holy typos in my post. I can see the government doing the same thing. We can’t afford to keep spending at the same rates. Trump wanted to move entire agencies thousands of miles to reduce headcount. Reverting to the pre pandemic telework guidelines could accomplish the same thing. There’s no way every agency functions as efficiently and effectively with WFH. The real estate sits vacant and creates unnecessary costs. It’s a no brainer and will happen.

2

Evening_Chemist_2367 t1_j8q65tn wrote

Oh, federal employees are going to revitalize downtown businesses? At $16 for a mediocre sandwich for lunch? I suggest Muriel work with her real estate and developer buddies to drive down costs for those businesses because there's not much compelling or affordable about downtown businesses to federal employees.

16