Whatever G. The point remains that higher interest rates means higher rates the banks have to charge. You are essentially nitpicking instead of focusing on the greater point

hehe

https://preview.redd.it/jmm026mk2fqa1.jpeg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=59b454b49ec5df335577a9fb84cb763a5d4ee894

Don’t get punched in the face

Really depends. When rates come down inevitably, they’ll fare well. In 08 Treasuries skyrocketed. But I think some growth stocks will do substantially better in that situation. Sounds regarded, but it depends on your time horizon.

RE your last paragraph: Oil and stupid bidens energy plan are why inflation became runaway inflation. Remember that scare we had? 10 dollar gas and 15 dollar diesel. That, friends, was the cunt hair that broke the cameltoe’s back.

This. But this is boring. Weeklies and theta gang is more fun.

I made a mistake in the prior comment cuz I was distracted - for that Regarded blunder, I apologize

Ignore the idiots replying to you. They're clearly regards who don't know shit about fuck

Although buying bonds may have some opportunity cost (i.e., if the market crashes before your bond matures, you miss out on buying stocks for a low price) they're a decent investment right now thanks to super high federal reserve rates, volatile markets, and slowly (but steadily) decreasing inflation.

And, as always, treasury bonds are essentually 100% safe and guaranteed ROI. If treasury bonds failed, your money in them would've been worthless anyway.

As with all things in any investment decisions, it's trade-off of risk vs return. If you hold cash, you risk devaluation thanks to inflation but you also have the possibility of immediate liquid funds in the event of a crash. If you buy bonds, you risk losing the opportunity to buy stocks at market-crash prices, but have guaranteed ROI if held to maturity.

But to answer your question, "to stay afloat," yes. Absolutely.

#Submission Vote Removed This submission was voted spam. ##Reasons

Hi I'm new what do I do?

If you buy a bond before rates come down the guaranteed return doesn't change at all. As a matter of fact, for long term bonds purchased before rate cuts, the value of them increases as newer bonds yield lower and lower returns.

OP is all of the hedge funds at once

In fairness to OP and in gratefulness to all here, he’s learning more by posting this than most people will stirring though 2-3 college econ classes.

Thanks for posting regularly and this is the most anticipated daily post for me.

Sic burn

Come back?

A company that has never made a profit, ever?

A company that now has a $1B loss per year?

Ok, you do you, regard.

If an AP econ eassy I would give it an A. Got all the basics correct just none of subtleties. The sexy parts.

Nothing as sexy as debt. Look deeper into interest rates, bonds, taxes and money. Then read about banks.

Then, maybe, invest accordingly. Or listen to the high school kid.

Puts on OP

I came here to throw away karma.

Moose cum

even if we let the bank fail. The c suite will still get paid at least until the collapse.

Preferred Shareholders still get paid until the bank collapses and majority still get paid back afterward.

Bank goes under. Another pops up in its place. Probably under the same foolhardy management scheme that failed the first time around with identical overpaid assholes running it into the ground.

God save us all.

Unity is still a good choice for mobile games but yeah for desktop and consoles, it’s game over.

It’s interesting that of all the things you were irked by, the “printing” of cash theme wasn’t one. There’s no “printing.” That’s one of the really really frustrating misconceptions that I guess bothers me more than anyone else.

Obviously the metaphors are a code.

M2 shrinking is very interesting… and deflationary.

Buy buy buy!!!