Recent comments in /f/wallstreetbets
tothemoonandback01 t1_jdcdkn0 wrote
Where have I heard this before; "this time it's different"
bahkins313 t1_jdcdglt wrote
Reply to comment by Aarschotdachaubucha in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
Sounds like he’s full of from his calls getting rekt
ideal_NCO t1_jdcc8ty wrote
Reply to comment by Aarschotdachaubucha in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
/r/MurderedByWords
[deleted] t1_jdcbrzq wrote
Reply to comment by antihero-itsme in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
[removed]
cheekybandit0 t1_jdcbh2a wrote
Reply to comment by Aarschotdachaubucha in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
Ohh so this is Michael McKee!! Ok I saw the vid earlier of the question and Powell's response, had no idea what he looked like. Thanks
Minimum-Ad-2026 t1_jdcb7hi wrote
Reply to comment by Ill-Expression1737 in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
Thank you kind fellow, I sure appreciate the love. May you have a blessed day yourself and may the markets forever be in your favor.
Comprehensive-Belt40 t1_jdcb3c3 wrote
Everything is fine until it's not. Then when it is wrecking the economy, people will say nobody sees it coming.
Then later on, other people will come out stating signs were obvious.
Of course, the fed will cut interest rate and restart QE.
Aarschotdachaubucha t1_jdcayy3 wrote
Reply to comment by cheekybandit0 in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
He's Bloomberg's rep on economics to go sit at the FOMC presser. He knew exactly what he was asking (whether or not Fintwit and cryptopumpers were shilling a false narrative about rate cuts based on a willful misinterpretation of the FOMC press release). Here's his Twitter:
Aarschotdachaubucha t1_jdcarsa wrote
Reply to comment by iWriteYourMusic in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
You probably forget most of the people in here are trading in broker accounts with "betting pools" so low they can't even qualify for real time quotes. They're probably watching a 15 minute candle update on Yahoo Finance, thinking the entire movement happened all at once. These are the same people talking about gap downs/ups like the Asian and European markets don't exist.
LavenderAutist t1_jdcakdu wrote
Berz run 2023
Aarschotdachaubucha t1_jdcae5g wrote
Reply to comment by Odd-Block-2998 in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
This reporter probably has a better understanding of the economics involved than you and the entire generation of people who were stupid enough to support your dumb existence long enough so that you can write your moronic comment. Dude sits on the economic bench for Bloomberg, and is their chosen guy to go sit at a FOMC presser. His inert Press credential to get in there has more economic awareness than your entire brain. Read his Twitter you poor, deluded, dumb piece of shit: https://twitter.com/mckonomy
Aarschotdachaubucha t1_jdca2x3 wrote
Reply to comment by Due-Employee9272 in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
Except that's not what Powell said. Powell is leaving open the door to the possibility that further chaos may impede their ability to raise the long term rate, forcing them to delay but not pause raising rates while they resolve the next crisis. He's essentially telegraphing a subject they just finished discussing in FOMC.
If the FOMC were still focused on figuring out the scale of the damage from additional, post-SVB/Signature bank failures (i.e. if FRC or others had fallen), they might not have worried about a rate hike at this moment. As Powell said, additional bank failures in the short term were taking more money out than their interest rate hike could do. That's why they didn't do 50bps in this meeting.
VisualMod t1_jdc9ssu wrote
| User Report | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Submissions | 2 | First Seen In WSB | 2 days ago |
| Total Comments | 0 | Previous Best DD | |
| Account Age | 5 years | [^scan ^comment ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_comment&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20comment%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20comment%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) | [^scan ^submission ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_submission&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20submission%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20submission%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) |
Aarschotdachaubucha t1_jdc9r14 wrote
Reply to comment by nexxcotech in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
He's well aware of what he was asking. He's from Bloomberg and writes economics articles on the same team as Matt Levine and many other econ-nerds. Some samples from his Twitter this week:
> For all the fears generated by massive Twitter misunderstanding of the central bank swap lines announcement yesterday... Today @ecb had one bid for $5 million; @bankofengland , BOJ , @SNB_BNS had zero. No funding stress at the moment.
> Why new @federalreserve lending isn't QE or the end of QT: The Bank Term Lending Program accepts Treasuries and MBS for one year from #banks looking to shore up their balance sheets. That money is not going to be used by those banks for investments or loans. 1/2
> And they're not going to buy Treasuries or MBS with it. It's not going into the economy. And it has to be paid back, with (admittedly nominal) interest. Loans to @FDICgov receiver banks also have to be paid back and aren't going into the economy. 2/2
Dude is 100% cutting to the heart of the matter and doesn't care about whatever retail / cryptoscam narratives are being pumped on Youtube and Fintwit.
brad9991 t1_jdc9mk6 wrote
Reply to comment by iWriteYourMusic in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
Yea, people seem to like this cause it's more interesting but Yellen is who you really should thank/blame
tickle-tickle t1_jdc9dxo wrote
Reply to 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
It was Yellen who turn the market. She was talking the same time jpow was. She said she not going to support uninsured bank account. Opposite of what jpow said
Due-Employee9272 t1_jdc95ft wrote
Reply to comment by X-Boozemonkey-X in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
Well, what Powell said could have been taken as bullish. Thinking of this as a rate raise would suggest they won't need to raise as much in the future and brings the likelihood of a pause back into the spotlight.
Snotteh t1_jdc90qe wrote
Reply to 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
Such a smug bull smile
youdirtyhoe t1_jdc8xot wrote
Reply to comment by schnitzel-kuh in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
I had a single tear fall when i heard that answer.
Stock-Pension1803 t1_jdc8xmr wrote
Reply to comment by Badboy_Dank in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
Well for one thinking they are in any sort of trouble.$16 billion in profit for 2022 indicates that whatever ape nonsense this Twitter page is spewing, is pretty insignificant.
The sequoia “bailout” is anything but. It’s just an outside investment. Money makes money and these guys know this very well.
youdirtyhoe t1_jdc8sja wrote
Reply to 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
That part sucked. Thought jpow was gonna be dovish like everyone else. I was wrong.
Kengriffinspimp t1_jdc8ljp wrote
Reply to comment by Badboy_Dank in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
No one can answer because it’s true
Kengriffinspimp t1_jdc8k6i wrote
Reply to comment by Neerko_bat in 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
What conspiracy? How does theta gang effect share holders?
JotaroTheOceanMan t1_jdc86hh wrote
Reply to 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
He looks like someone stole Nathan Lane and Patton Oswalts genes but used a dirty tank when making the clone.
PurplerRain t1_jdcdqgc wrote
Reply to 4 Trillion dollar corrective response by Theorysquatch
Bro had calls. You can see it in his face.