Recent comments in /f/wallstreetbets
DangerStranger138 t1_jaehd3r wrote
Reply to comment by lost_in_life_34 in Ford seeks patent for self-repossessing auto. Puts on ford? by Mountainman220
Guess Mister tow trucker driver noob doesn't know the arsenal retrofitting potential a van down by the river is capable of
jcodes57 t1_jaeh8pm wrote
Reply to comment by mytendies in Most Bullish Underlyings and the "Cheapest" Calls by mytendies
I can contest. Been wheeling COIN since the start of the year and IV has been closer to 130% for almost all the weekly/monthly options I’ve been trading. 100% IV even after a rip the past 2 days is still relatively low. This probably due to earnings coming to pass?
the_bondvillian t1_jaeh8l7 wrote
suprised anyone on here knows what taylor rule is
VisualMod t1_jaeh7v5 wrote
Reply to S&P 500 analysis. by hummmduno
>It is important to note that I am not a financial advisor, and my analysis should not be taken as investment advice. Always do your own research before making any investment decisions.
VisualMod t1_jaeh78w wrote
Reply to S&P 500 analysis. by hummmduno
| User Report | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Submissions | 1 | First Seen In WSB | 3 weeks ago |
| Total Comments | 2 | Previous Best DD | |
| Account Age | 4 years | [^scan ^comment ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_comment&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20comment%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20comment%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) | [^scan ^submission ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_submission&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20submission%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20submission%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) |
Hey /u/hummmduno, positions or ban. Reply to this with a screenshot of your entry/exit. >TL;DR: The S&P 500 is likely to experience a 5-16% decline in mid-May, with the most likely scenario being a 5% decline.
AutoModerator t1_jaeh6as wrote
Reply to S&P 500 analysis. by hummmduno
Our AI tracks our most intelligent users. After parsing your posts, we have concluded that you are within the 5th percentile of all WSB users.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
DangerStranger138 t1_jaeh302 wrote
Reply to comment by HenryGoodbar in Ford seeks patent for self-repossessing auto. Puts on ford? by Mountainman220
Sheriff's will start putting out warrants only on Friday nights hoping to catch then en route to home from the bar reeking of alcohol for extra charges
Rocketeer006 t1_jaegwx8 wrote
Reply to comment by robot_handjob in #breakingnews by code6violation
That's the way we like to cuck.
tristian_lay t1_jaegucp wrote
My gparents just switched to dish. Calls to the moon
[deleted] t1_jaeguc1 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Fed might raise policy rates to 6% - BofA by Broiler100
[deleted]
Maybe_Awesome22 t1_jaegtss wrote
Reply to #CVNA 5th most shorted stock per MarketWatch today. Up 11% yesterday and 6% this morning. Business model changed two days ago. Squeeze? by BriantheGardener
Going up on low volume too.
HenryGoodbar t1_jaegskg wrote
Reply to comment by ankole_watusi in Ford seeks patent for self-repossessing auto. Puts on ford? by Mountainman220
This guy’s Penske material!
DangerStranger138 OP t1_jaegr33 wrote
Reply to Biden Bars Companies From Using US Chips Act Cash for Buybacks || Decade-Long Foreign Manufacturing Restrictions Imposed by DangerStranger138
MEATY CLIFFNOTES
> ^(The Commerce Department on Tuesday) ^(released its plans) ^(to begin accepting applications in late June for a $39-billion manufacturing subsidy program. The law also creates a 25% investment tax credit for building chip plants, estimated to be worth $24 billion.)
>
> ^(Recipients who receive more than $150 million in direct funding "will be required to share with the U.S. government a portion of any cash flows or returns that exceed the applicant’s projections by an agreed-upon threshold," the department said.)
>
>^(Companies winning funding are also prohibited from using chips funds for dividends or stock buybacks, and must provide details of any plans to buy back their own shares over five years. The department will consider an "applicant’s commitments to refrain from stock buybacks.")
>
>^(Democratic lawmakers have noted that the largest U.S. semiconductor companies have poured hundreds of billions of dollars into stock buybacks in recent years, with Intel) ^((INTC.O)) ^(spending more than $100 billion on buybacks since 2005. Intel also pays a dividend.)
>
>^(It's not uncommon for states to require specific employment targets as a condition for tax subsidies, but the Biden administration is a significant expansion.)
>
>^(Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said companies must submit a plan that includes an outline of workforce needs. Applicants seeking more than $150 million in direct funding must submit "a plan for how they will provide affordable and accessible childcare for their workers.")
>
>^(Applicants must address six program priority areas including plans "to commit to future investment in the U.S. semiconductor industry, including to build R&D facilities in the United States.")
>
>^(Applicants should also "create opportunities for minority owned, veteran-owned, and women-owned businesses; demonstrate climate and environmental responsibility; invest in their communities by addressing barriers to economic inclusion; and commit to using iron, steel, and construction materials produced in the United States.")
>
>^(Most direct funding awards are expected to range between 5% and 15% of project capital expenditures. Commerce said it generally expects the total amount of an award including loan or loan guarantee, to not exceed 35% of project capital expenditures.)
>
>^(Raimondo noted that companies winning awards will be required to enter into agreements restricting their ability to expand semiconductor manufacturing capacity in foreign countries of concern like China for 10 years after winning funding. They cannot engage in any joint research or licensing efforts with a foreign entity of concern involving sensitive technologies.)
Avatar252525 t1_jaegpum wrote
Reply to comment by Harvick4tw in Tesla new plant in Monterrey, Mexico confirmed by OliveInvestor
GHOST12339 t1_jaegpqb wrote
Reply to comment by MyPeePeeReversed in Fed might raise policy rates to 6% - BofA by Broiler100
We're all the cucked husband. JPow fucks our wives AND us.
Necessary-Onion-7494 t1_jaegnze wrote
Reply to comment by lost_in_life_34 in Ford seeks patent for self-repossessing auto. Puts on ford? by Mountainman220
The cop used uno reverse card.
KuntFuckula t1_jaegl0p wrote
Reply to Biden Bars Companies From Using US Chips Act Cash for Buybacks || Decade-Long Foreign Manufacturing Restrictions Imposed by DangerStranger138
Good. CEOs need to stop juicing EPS via buybacks to attract investment over their competition. It’s gimmicky stock value manipulation.
GHOST12339 t1_jaegkh4 wrote
Reply to comment by Eccentricc in Fed might raise policy rates to 6% - BofA by Broiler100
It's official, my interest has peaked.
Necessary-Onion-7494 t1_jaega17 wrote
Reply to comment by HenryGoodbar in Ford seeks patent for self-repossessing auto. Puts on ford? by Mountainman220
I am sure there is a black mirror episode in the making with that theme.
[deleted] t1_jaeft57 wrote
TopStockJock t1_jaefstc wrote
Reply to comment by Aleph_Price_Action in Trading fees and commissions by Charles___Lee___Ray
This is the way
mytendies OP t1_jaefqhz wrote
Reply to comment by PleasantAnomaly in Most Bullish Underlyings and the "Cheapest" Calls by mytendies
They are cheap relative to historical volatility. That is all I can say.
Cheap is a relative term so the question is... relative to what? If it is being compared to historical vol then these calls are cheap (IV is significantly less than HV).
New-Sky8027 OP t1_jaefod4 wrote
Reply to comment by AustinPowers007 in Rolls Royce Holdings PLC recovery play, aiming for 7 figures by 2024. by New-Sky8027
Debt is fixed at a low rate from years ago and so getting cheaper with time.
All companies operate with debt, and RR is expected to improve to £800M FCF for 2023. None of this is a threat unless international flying stops altogether.
ldecline t1_jaefnm3 wrote
Reply to comment by mytendies in Most Bearish Stocks and the Cheapest Puts by mytendies
4 weeks out... Are you from the future?
AutoModerator t1_jaehi2r wrote
Reply to YOLO - SPY PUTS by in_ur_ass
Hey, if you haven't already, please reply to this comment with your positions and what led you to enter or exit them!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.