Recent comments in /f/wallstreetbets

ballsoutofthebathtub t1_jack5bh wrote

I’m not sure about people being any hornier now than they were a year or two ago. People also bought a lot of clothing during the pandemic to make themselves feel better, so the return to normal might not mean anything.

One argument you could make is all the Onlyfans girls need to base their “content” off of something and many have wishlists for things like lingerie, so effectively this is the first time in history that horny single men are buying a substantial amount of lingerie.

1

Ethric_The_Mad t1_jacjqg1 wrote

I don't see how policies like this are allowed to even exist. Truly scummy. We can gamble our life savings on lotto tickets but we should have our money locked away and stolen for our own protection if we research a stock and make educated guesses as to when or why it may go up or down multiple times in a week. Like, ok, sure, it's bad to risk money but wouldn't it be safer to risk $100 instead of $25000? Why are we only allowed to take risks with extremely large sums of money that 70%+ of America will never see? It's vile and the people that make these laws should be promptly replaced with WallStreetBets degenerates and I'm not even joking.

4

attofreak t1_jacjngq wrote

The Feds just as easily might do away with it too. If holding the interest rates at even 5% does enough damage to bring inflation down over the next 2 years, they will consider it a "success". And the moment they even decrease rates once by 25 bps, markets will lose their minds and rally to new highs. We are entering a new era now, where "Japanification" of American and in turn global economics is underway - hopefully, a very slow process unfolding over several decades before we sell next few generations for our immediate needs. The classic debt cycles will be abused worse than rule 34 hentais about Sammy the assistant.

90