Recent comments in /f/wallstreetbets

BMXnRoidz t1_j9u5obz wrote

>The company’s shares have tumbled 65% over the past year amid turmoil in the cryptocurrency market. But they have rebounded 70% this year, helped by bitcoin’s ascent.

I started buying up a bunch of $COIN in Dec. Very happy with my gains so far. The shit's tied to BTC, and every time a crypto exchange goes offline then CB just picks up more customers. I think business will continue to funnel into CB + next crypto bull makes this one a slow pitch. Cathy's problem is she bought the fucking top and now needs to bring her average down.

2

Dan_inKuwait t1_j9u271h wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in 😂 by Ass-Pounder-4000

We get it, you don't know how to trade and now have emotional feelings for your stonks.

But, you've got to realise there's more than one game in this casino.

Stop telling everyone to carry your bags, it's pathetic.

And spamming off-topic tickers on unrelated posts is borderline spam.  Quit it.

1

wallstreetbets-ModTeam t1_j9u20t8 wrote

Thanks for your submission!

r/WallStreetBets is known for making absurd but sometimes profitable trades that no one ever considered possible.

To keep making that possible, we need your help in keeping the feed of threads interesting and exciting.

We try to move all the short and basic questions, analysis, or jokes to the daily thread so that the best quality content can stick around and be more visible.

This is definitely a bit subjective, and there are no hard and fast rules, but a few indicators that your post should have really been a comment in the daily thread include:

  • Asking a question that is easily googleable or has likely been asked before. E.g. "What app should I use?", "What should I invest in?".

  • Beating a meme to death, like the 10 millionth, "inverse cramer" joke again.

  • Reposting jokes from the front page but slightly altered to be related to trading.


All that being said, we are here to help. We want to make it as easy as possible for you to post to our community. We have to balance this with making the subreddit interesting for our readers.

If you need some guidance, don't hesitate to reach out to modmail and we'll give you some pointers!

1

psychoticdream t1_j9u1hqc wrote

Depends. Good gains there on that industry though. Especially the ones dealing with mrna tech because it's so fucking versatile it can be adapted to any illness (including cancer treatment which is showing some good promise so far) so we'll see flu vaccines using mrna tech and they WILL have better efficacy rates compared to traditional vaccines (traditional vaccines usually have 50-60% efficacy)

2