Recent comments in /f/television
[deleted] OP t1_jausayj wrote
Reply to comment by Gigachops in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]
Gigachops t1_jaurt02 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
Whatever man. I'm done with your weird troll self after this. Sure, putting a stop the The Simpsons is a major issue.
Your rant was incoherent and referred to anti-censorship movements as "whiners." Among other things. I'm not even sure what your point was.
The only violence I'm contributing to is giving your sorry ass post a beatdown tonight.
[deleted] t1_jaunnz2 wrote
Reply to comment by horseren0ir in ‘Gotham Knights’ Series at CW Casts Doug Bradley as Joe Chill by klutzysunshine
>Pennyworth
I still can’t believe they renamed the show The Origin of Batman’s Butler.
Like dang, just come out and say the viewership is low lol
[deleted] OP t1_jaul5yv wrote
Reply to comment by Gigachops in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] OP t1_jauhx73 wrote
Reply to comment by Gigachops in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]
NoOneShallPassHassan t1_jauhtrs wrote
>an impressionable audience
Won't somebody please think of the children?
[deleted] OP t1_jauhtir wrote
Reply to comment by FrancisScottKilos in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]
Gigachops t1_jauhsgm wrote
They ascribe and purport huh? Maybe put down the thesaurus. Those words ... don't work that way. Maybe if all the books weren't currently on fire you'd know that.
Impressionable. So many young children do love The Simpsons these days.
If anything it should be censored for not being funny. It hasn't really held up well. Whining about expression? Trying to stop a directed campaign to remove all non-conformist thought from schools is hardly "whining."
If the TV network decides not to show those episodes IDGAF. That's the free market. Fortunately The Simpsons is not educational material so it's a relatively easy discussion.
We need to be better, huh. Is taking down episodes of a 30 year old cartoon the next frontier for American morality? Probably not.
FrancisScottKilos t1_jauhn8b wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
You know what they say about what happens when you assume?
[deleted] OP t1_jauhm11 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] OP t1_jauhefj wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] OP t1_jauhakp wrote
Reply to comment by FrancisScottKilos in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] OP t1_jaugtx5 wrote
Reply to comment by wednesdayware in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]
FrancisScottKilos t1_jaugt71 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
Judge to your hearts content. That's free speech and I support it.
[deleted] OP t1_jaugjnd wrote
Reply to comment by FrancisScottKilos in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]
SecondtoNone38 t1_jaugi7p wrote
Wants to be progressive by wiping old idealogy from the history books. Sounds like whitewashing to me.
If you can't look at old ideas without being critical of them, how will you deal with those ideas when they inevitably come back around again? Nazis didn't disappear, they still exist. Do we wipe their entire history because they killed thousands of Jews?
People need to learn that getting rid of history only serves to fuel the opressors that got into power because of ignorance of history in the first place.
wednesdayware t1_jaugel8 wrote
And who decides what “better” is? Therein lies the problem.
FrancisScottKilos t1_jaugcq8 wrote
I support free speech. Outdated ideas in yesterdays media help to highlight the mistakes of the past. "Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it"
chimchooree t1_jauga0n wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
I didn't ask a question.
[deleted] OP t1_jaug453 wrote
Reply to comment by chimchooree in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]
chimchooree t1_jaufz8w wrote
I wonder what you're talking about.
[deleted] t1_jau20n2 wrote
As soon as Michael left the Office, that was the end.
Carrell was such a linchpin for the show’s ensemble that the writers had literally no idea what to do to replace him. So they simply assassinated Andy and made him an incompetent idiot, despite his well-educated character being the total opposite. The show doesn’t recover in those last two seasons, though the finale wrap-up is pretty good.
Another one that comes to mind is Buffy dying in S5.
The beginning of S6 is about all the good that comes from it. Then everything nosedives, character personalities are completely decimated, plot lines make way less sense than they ever did, and the villains become so much less interesting. You don’t care because what are they gonna do, kill her again? The Potentials being terribly uninteresting in S7 is just the icing on the cake.
attemptedmonknf t1_jatmazl wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ‘Gotham Knights’ Series at CW Casts Doug Bradley as Joe Chill by klutzysunshine
Not a DC CW but this reminds me of the mos vespa gang from boba hutt
attemptedmonknf t1_jatlyae wrote
Reply to comment by whitepangolin in ‘Gotham Knights’ Series at CW Casts Doug Bradley as Joe Chill by klutzysunshine
I fucking wish
[deleted] OP t1_javtwb4 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Removing Simpsons episodes is a good thing, and here's why by [deleted]
[deleted]