Recent comments in /f/television
OmniManDidNothngWrng t1_jacyjqv wrote
Reply to comment by DisturbedNocturne in Damian Lewis Returning to ‘Billions’ For Season 7 by impeccabletim
well they announced a Millions and Trillions spin-off so I imagine they will end Billions and then send some of the characters off to those shows or at least some crossovers.
Barleyarleyy t1_jacxspb wrote
Reply to comment by The_Iceman2288 in Stephen Fry to Host ‘Jeopardy!’ for ITV in U.K. by TheCrazedGeek
Featuring Hugh Laurie as Richard Ayoade's dad.
wrainedaxx t1_jacx00v wrote
Reply to comment by berlinbaer in Party Down - Season 3 Premiere Discussion by Prax150
Topher!
Petrichor02 t1_jacwwhy wrote
Yeah, there's a lot of good stories that could be told post-Season 5, but the post-Season 5 we got usually just did the worst possible version of each of those stories. Case in point, how do you go bigger than the devil? You could go with the living embodiment of chaos, the Leviathan. And post-Season 5 of Supernatural did that! ...But it wasn't just the one Leviathan, it was multiple leviathans, and they had nothing to do with the chaos dragon of lore or any sort of leviathan mythos really, instead just being virtually immortal versions of an enemy the brothers have already fought multiple times.
What gets me though is that Kripke was still writing on the show in Season 6. Yes, he was no longer the head writer, but he was still consulting, directly writing a couple of episodes, and was apparently okay with all of the lore inconsistencies and plot holes that Season 6 produced (unless he only had knowledge about the episodes he was working on and not any of the others).
Because of that and the low points of the Carver era, I think I would still be skeptical of a post-S5 new Kripke era even though those first five seasons were amazing.
[deleted] t1_jacwvi9 wrote
Reply to comment by RealJohnGillman in ‘Perry Mason’ Finds Its Mojo in Season 2 by Getting Down and Dirty by jez124
[removed]
jingleheimerschitt t1_jacwbif wrote
Reply to comment by cello12345 in “ Prime Video's The Consultant Is a Little Weird, a Little Unsettling, and Mostly Mediocre.” by Hidethegoodbiscuits
Personally, I just figured it was one of those things very rich, very young gaming company owners would do for the lolz -- architects can be paid off like anyone else, and it's possible decisions like that are what led Compware to be in the financial situation it was in.
ours t1_jacw86b wrote
Reply to comment by unclericostan in ‘Perry Mason’ Finds Its Mojo in Season 2 by Getting Down and Dirty by jez124
So many good things but that music. Just fantastic.
ours t1_jacw50b wrote
Reply to comment by flaccidplatypus in ‘Perry Mason’ Finds Its Mojo in Season 2 by Getting Down and Dirty by jez124
That felt like the kind of show who would be right at home at HBO.
DoAsIDontSay t1_jacvnid wrote
Agreed. The story was told by the end of Season 5. Personally I hated the angels and especially Castiel who was played by an extremely bad actor. He was okay in 4 and 5 but anything after that involving him or the angels was tedious to get through. It was so clearly not working anymore that they wrote him out at one point but ended up bringing him back because of the backlash from (I presume) viewers who thought he was hot. Sam was a bad actor too but the chemistry with Dean helped offset his bad acting even though I think he actually got worse as the show went on. Supernatural was a great show for the first 5 seasons but the other seasons and focus on Castiel tarnished it.
musememo t1_jacvfty wrote
Now I have to watch Jeopardy.
sculptureofman t1_jacv9j8 wrote
Even if he does a bad job he still gets 2 mill
[deleted] t1_jacv8zc wrote
Reply to comment by f-ingsteveglansberg in Finally giving LOST a watch in 2023. by shadowdra126
The time spent on the island defined them. It's the only thing that ultimately mattered. Live together die alone etc.
takeitassaid OP t1_jacv56a wrote
Reply to comment by SurrealRaypissed in Just a short question about the extras on Star Trek. Is there a reason that they always change? by takeitassaid
I can understand that, as i said in the case of Star Trek those are ships with over a 1000people on board, so it may make sense to always see new people.
BalsamicBasil OP t1_jacuvm7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Pedro Pascal: The trials and triumphs of the first breakout star of 2023 by BalsamicBasil
Yeah "breakout" wasn't the best choice of word for the title (especially since most folks on this subreddit are just going to read the headline), but the article does talk about the other major roles he has been in, how successful those shows/his roles were, how it increased his fame, presently culminating with The Last Of Us and The Mandalorian.
I think what the author is trying to say by "breakout" is twofold. First, that Pedro Pascal is the first standout actor so far of this year, 2023. One could say Adam Scott was a "breakout star" of 2022 because of his incredible starring role in Severance (although that wasn't as widely watched). Or Jennifer Coolidge, bc of her role in The White Lotus and personality.
Second, Pascal is very much an actor/celebrity "of the pop cultural moment," not only with starring roles in two major tv series connected to major franchises but also a huge, dedicated fan following that goes beyond his acting performances to his personality, a fanbase that only intensified with his role in The Mandalorian and now The Last Of Us. This certainly isn't the first time he has had a media/cultural moment - I know he did a lot of major interviews and such during Narcos and The Mandalorian. But Pascal is once again having a moment, and it feels especially zeitgeist-y and meme-y, as reflected and reinforced by his hosting SNL. And being a guest on Graham Norton.
Finally, as I said, the release of The Last Of Us and the third season of The Mandalorian at the same time feels like a culmination of success from an actor who has progressively acted in bigger and bigger roles since Game of Thrones. I mean, how many actors are starring in not one but TWO of the biggest, most popular series connected to two unrelated major franchises - Star Wars and The Last Of Us video game - which are being released at the same time.
Anyway, I thought the article was a surprisingly well-researched - yet brief - biographical profile of an actor...and without a mention of "internet daddy" lol
saufcheung t1_jacusof wrote
I agree, first 4-5 seasons were excellent. After that, it felt like they needed to keep increasing the intensity and made questionable decisions. This happens to many of these shows.
The procedurals like Grey's Anatomy, NCIS, etc have it easier.
escof t1_jaculcl wrote
Reply to comment by f-ingsteveglansberg in Finally giving LOST a watch in 2023. by shadowdra126
Maybe his wife wasn't his soul mate but the woman he settled for because you know...
RealJohnGillman t1_jacuk77 wrote
Reply to comment by gerryf19 in ‘Perry Mason’ Finds Its Mojo in Season 2 by Getting Down and Dirty by jez124
I mean it seems that the last installment in the franchise before the 2020 television series was a 1995 television film. So the series was dormant (with no new media) for a full 25 years. So if one was under 25 (or even 30, assuming they were not watching Perry Mason at 5), or simply was not American (given that Perry Mason is an American property), it would not be unbelievable for one to not know what Perry Mason was going into this television series.
If it helps, off the top of my head the only Rihanna song I can think of is “Shut Up and Drive”.
dwalker444 t1_jacu8z4 wrote
Reply to Have you ever let a show pile up so you can binge rather than watch weekly? What does that say about our viewing habits? by TimeTraveler3056
As an oldster, watching what I want, when I want has me feeling groovy.
im_a_dick_head t1_jacu6l1 wrote
Reply to Have you ever let a show pile up so you can binge rather than watch weekly? What does that say about our viewing habits? by TimeTraveler3056
You just have multiple shows to watch, that's how you do it.
archlector t1_jacu5aj wrote
Reply to Have you ever let a show pile up so you can binge rather than watch weekly? What does that say about our viewing habits? by TimeTraveler3056
Most shows I watch only after they have aired a complete season, it's not to say I binge all the episodes. I really need to like a show to bother with weekly viewing. TLoU now, Succession next would be weekly.
[deleted] t1_jacu2br wrote
Reply to comment by gerryf19 in ‘Perry Mason’ Finds Its Mojo in Season 2 by Getting Down and Dirty by jez124
[deleted]
twbrn t1_jacu1s2 wrote
Reply to comment by Jokerang in Pedro Pascal: The trials and triumphs of the first breakout star of 2023 by BalsamicBasil
And it's not like he hasn't been the lead actor in one of the biggest shows out there since 2019.
twbrn t1_jactsfv wrote
Reply to Have you ever let a show pile up so you can binge rather than watch weekly? What does that say about our viewing habits? by TimeTraveler3056
I do that with most shows that I want to see. I like not being stuck to anyone else's schedule and taking things at my pace. Sometimes that means 3 episodes in a night, sometimes it means I don't touch something for months. It's my choice.
Pre-streaming days sucked until DVRs were available.
Lurching t1_jactktp wrote
Reply to comment by ensignr in Stephen Fry to Host ‘Jeopardy!’ for ITV in U.K. by TheCrazedGeek
QI with Sandi is very good, but certainly not better.
Logical_Copy_8465 t1_jacyqfv wrote
Reply to comment by NGNSteveTheSamurai in Finally giving LOST a watch in 2023. by shadowdra126
I for one am not someone who shits on the ending although it could have been better. I think a larger portion of general audience will accept fantastical elements, especially when introduced early, compared to religious nonsense.
Partly the same reason Battlestar Galacticas ending isn't generally liked. For the majority of GoT I refused to believe the red lady's powers were anything to do with a God and were just random magic powers since in the real world its all just sky fairy bs. Why should I accept this other world fictional or based on ours has real gods