Recent comments in /f/technology
Realistic-Control-11 t1_jcq3bqz wrote
Regulate and unionized so when they fail there's something coming $ for the employees retirement and such
yorfavmua t1_jcq27f6 wrote
Reply to comment by pimpeachment in Big tech companies are selling their Silicon Valley campuses amid struggle by McFatty7
Sounds like every tech startup
orphf13 t1_jcq1hc2 wrote
Reply to comment by avl0 in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
What is? They actually did that and for good reason. Their biggest customer is Airbus and they didn’t want to pay all the import duties into the EU.
Zjoee t1_jcpvz21 wrote
Reply to comment by KuatRZ1 in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
Lmao I got you, I didn't even notice. The Interceptor has long been my favorite starfighter. Back when I played Star Wars Galaxies, all I did was fly around in my Interceptor getting into dogfights.
KuatRZ1 t1_jcpvek5 wrote
Reply to comment by Zjoee in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
There was a joke in here, maybe look up my username :)
bluecifer7 t1_jcpuiaw wrote
Reply to comment by favpetgoat in Big tech companies are selling their Silicon Valley campuses amid struggle by McFatty7
Yep this is exactly what companies should do/are doing.
I go into the office once every 6 months for an entire week at a time, and so does my entire team
Existing_Display1794 t1_jcptkm8 wrote
This is dope.
squeevey t1_jcptbb2 wrote
Reply to comment by 0pimo in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
Yep it is. However, in an EV you still have to reinforce the battery so it does NOT crumple. And the battery has most of the mass.
So it is a matter of design to create crumpling for passengers while reinforcing the sled. Hence decoupling the two. Would be great to just have to purchase a new cabin instead of a whole new drive train.
[deleted] t1_jcpt922 wrote
Reply to comment by Suzki in Big tech companies are selling their Silicon Valley campuses amid struggle by McFatty7
[deleted]
tiredofmyownself t1_jcpt3n6 wrote
Reply to comment by Hardass_McBadCop in Big tech companies are selling their Silicon Valley campuses amid struggle by McFatty7
Most of these campuses in the original article do not have any skyscrapers so if the concern is based on that, it’s not really applicable.
No_Outcome2135 t1_jcpsxrg wrote
Reply to comment by forestapee in Big tech companies are selling their Silicon Valley campuses amid struggle by McFatty7
Please god, no malls.
creepystepdad72 t1_jcpsc5b wrote
Reply to comment by Suzki in Big tech companies are selling their Silicon Valley campuses amid struggle by McFatty7
Residential conversion is a tough one - a vicious cycle is already well underway. The value of a business park condo is the proximity to work, but if work is trying to get out of the business park...
Coworking isn't completely unreasonable, but that's 1) a LOT of space; and 2) still in a business park - not sure it's worth an investment. There's companies that've dumped half that footage right in the middle of urban centers and the coworking companies won't touch it.
I figure it has to be REITs gobbling buildings up at steep discounts and doing a heck of a lot of work apportioning into smaller offices for leasing. Even though I think it's the most likely, it's still really tricky...
A company that would have killed for a 10K sqft. lease in 2018 (but were getting pushed out of the market in favour of the bigger guys willing to take 5-10x the footage) likely aren't interested at standard lease terms anymore.
A 10 year term isn't going to be attractive to 95% of companies, and with the amount of folks stuck with 5+ years left on a pre-COVID term trying to dump to a sublease it makes even less sense to be a primary lessee.
A valid alternative option might be hotels. Conversion costs aside, there's a good concentration of tech HQs in the area who (even with fewer on premise employees) will still have visitors. In my experience, the business park Omni's and Westin's seemed to do brisk business and I get it... There's not exactly a ton to do in Menlo Park or Redwood City, but sometimes you just want to get in and out of there.
peadith t1_jcps5sy wrote
Reply to comment by squeevey in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
You know what would be funny is if the Chinese came out with a simple and cheap plain old electric vehicle without all this digital bull shit and it wipes the market.
0pimo t1_jcps1g6 wrote
Reply to comment by squeevey in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
Yeah pretty sure having a non-crumpling frame is how you transfer a whole lot of energy to the driver and kill people when they crash.
ImUrFrand t1_jcprpre wrote
Reply to comment by sarcastosaurus in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
Water freezes at 32° F.
over night temperature on the moon is around -300° F.
do you know what you're talking about?
deadjim4 t1_jcprmwa wrote
Reply to comment by mascachopo in Big tech companies are selling their Silicon Valley campuses amid struggle by McFatty7
Because people are Waffle House?
Silly-One7351 t1_jcprmgb wrote
Reply to comment by typesett in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
To be accurate Qualcomm will never dominate EV. It may be either NVIDIA or AMD.
CraftOk1944 t1_jcprf13 wrote
They all live in Tahoe now. Probably planning on draining the lake to build more campuses.
squeevey t1_jcpr9xw wrote
Reply to comment by 0pimo in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
I don't disagree that it requires some engineering. I believe it is possible though. The cabin would be the safe zone. The sled would have the battery, motor, and wheels. The battery would like be in a non-crumple zone to prevent it from taking damage. Whereas the cabin would have crumple zones and could detach more easily.
Instead of thinking of the car as a complete unibody. You would compartmentalize the passenger cabin from the drive train.
typesett t1_jcpr2r3 wrote
Reply to comment by Silly-One7351 in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
They include Apple but why? So many companies who make cars right now
yes I know the rumors
peadith t1_jcpqq0b wrote
Reply to comment by squeevey in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
If they're going to put the billboards on the windshield I think I really will go for a horse and carriage. Do the Amish take lare-comers?
0pimo t1_jcpq639 wrote
Reply to comment by squeevey in Qualcomm Is Poised to Dominate EVs Before Apple Gets a Chance by OutlandishnessOk2452
I'm no car engineer, but I don't think it's possible to build something like this and have it structurally safe without it weighing an awful lot.
Modern cars, the body is the chassis and the cabin is integral to the structural integrity of the car.
No-Doughnut509 t1_jcpq3x7 wrote
Dot com meltdown part 2?
just_nobodys_opinion t1_jcppxg5 wrote
Reply to comment by work_hau_ab in SVB employees blame remote work for bank failure by work_hau_ab
Should have gone in r/facepalm?
kenflan t1_jcq3h8k wrote
Reply to Big tech companies are selling their Silicon Valley campuses amid struggle by McFatty7
The campuses and tech culture would stay around if SF government was competent and the FED stopped implementing ridiculously rate hikes. "Hike it until it's gone" really is becoming "hike it until it's gone"