Recent comments in /f/technology
derpam t1_jckvsjs wrote
What is whining about now?
SeagullKebab t1_jckvljs wrote
Can you all hear that real tiny violin?
[deleted] t1_jckvaje wrote
Reply to comment by open_door_policy in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
[deleted]
Shavethatmonkey t1_jckuvyq wrote
Reply to comment by kamekaze1024 in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
What would destroy the moon? You guys have a weird idea of what you think a small reactor can do. We've had dozens of reactor failures on earth, none came close to destroying the planet.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the size of planets vs the size of nuclear explosions.
anti-torque t1_jckuqnl wrote
If by "remote work," they mean work was somewhere other than where they were, we are starting to find common ground.
[deleted] t1_jckupzp wrote
Reply to comment by Useful-Ad-8619 in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
[removed]
LeftOnQuietRoad t1_jckuose wrote
Couldn’t we just solar it?
[deleted] t1_jckul91 wrote
[deleted]
SimmaDownNa t1_jckuf1v wrote
That's pocket change for him. He's fine.
PHATsakk43 t1_jckucl6 wrote
Reply to comment by Hunky_not_Chunky in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
These reactors will not use water but work with liquid metal coolant.
The heat sinks are giant radiative arrays. Similar designs were proposed for spacecraft during the SNAP program in the 1960s and 1970s.
RorschachShaman t1_jcktmz3 wrote
Yeah, didn't he pull like 2 billion out and was the one who told others to do the same? Pennies lost if he doesn't get this back.
ACCount82 t1_jcktdow wrote
Reply to comment by WhatTheZuck420 in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
Launching nuclear fuel into space is fairly safe, because it only becomes highly radioactive after the reactor starts running.
So you build and launch your reactor in a fully "stopped" state. You make sure it makes it to its destination. And only then you start the reactor and make the fuel "hot".
thatsglitchy t1_jcktd0r wrote
Of course they do
martixy t1_jckt964 wrote
In other news, Rolls Royce taken over by Bond villain. More at 11.
prefuse07 t1_jckt8jr wrote
Reply to The FTC is looking into Meta, YouTube, TikTok, Snap, Twitter, Pinterest, and Twitch’s advertising practices by marketrent
The world would be a much better place without the majority of those companies
ACCount82 t1_jckt8e2 wrote
Reply to comment by Hunky_not_Chunky in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
The issue with cooling in open space is that there's nothing you can dump your waste heat into.
Things like ISS use special radiators to radiate away waste heat - while small things that can generate a lot of heat for their size, like space suits, use water evaporation to mount a compact heat removal system.
On the surface of the Moon, you have the entire Moon that you could dump your waste heat into.
Of course, actually dumping the heat into the ground is an engineering and construction challenge - so early Moon and Mars reactors might opt for radiators, like the ones ISS currently uses. They would need a lot of them, but it's still doable for small reactors.
Ssider69 t1_jckt7xk wrote
That's another way of saying "please don't probe our deals"
Yeah ..must be all the remote workers!
chockychockster t1_jckss9v wrote
Oh, as a deposit? Then he'll get it all back. No schadenfreude here. The investors are getting rinsed, but depositors are all fine.
Ronedog22 t1_jcksrh2 wrote
I guess the tv show For All Mankind wasnt that sci-fi. Nuclear powers the moon-base on that show.
outsidetheparty t1_jckso27 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Gov't to launch nationwide campaign vs fake news by Wagamaga
"get number 5"? What on earth are you babbling about now?
CactusCurmudgeon t1_jcksnsz wrote
Reply to comment by thegayngler in SVB employees blame remote work for bank failure by work_hau_ab
Seriously. I work remotely for a bank and we're doing just fine.
[deleted] t1_jcksgrd wrote
Reply to comment by Ronny_Jotten in Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base by Vailhem
[removed]
0Ring-0 t1_jcksfst wrote
And he’ll be first to get it back. Everyone not a billionaire get in line and don’t hold your breath.
arghabargle t1_jcks2db wrote
The articles contains exactly zero input from SVB employees or any tangible argument whatsoever for why remote work had anything to do with things besides that they allowed it, mayhap even encouraged it.
igiveonefuck t1_jckvtgp wrote
Reply to comment by recon89 in Amazon sued for not telling New York store customers about facial recognition by thebelsnickle1991
Mackenzie bezos is our Robin Hood