Recent comments in /f/technology
[deleted] t1_jca9j36 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jca8jd8 wrote
Reply to comment by Nervous-Masterpiece4 in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
[deleted]
Klodviq t1_jca7teu wrote
Is there an equivalent law to AI text generators like Knoll’s Law of Media Accuracy is for newspapers? ChatGPT can be really convincing until you ask it something you understand well yourself.
[deleted] t1_jca6j51 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jca4smw wrote
Reply to comment by Rohit901 in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
[removed]
Strazdas1 t1_jca2svc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
Artificially gimping the AI, especially when it comes to considering specific groups of people, lead to bad results for everyone.
Strazdas1 t1_jca2jtq wrote
Reply to comment by anothermaninyourlife in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
>It's not necessary for them (Open A.I) to disclose every new step that they have taken
Then they should rename their company to Close AI.
Nervous-Masterpiece4 t1_jca2ird wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
I would like to see a newcomer come along and knock all of the incumbents of their feet.
The last thing we need is convicted monopolists or those with existing business models to protect at the helm.
[deleted] t1_jca0i4g wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jca0hwo wrote
[removed]
ksoss1 t1_jc9z0oa wrote
Reply to comment by tnnrk in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
Things moving fast! I wouldn't be surprised if we get GPT 4.5 by the end of the year. Also Google will probably bring the heat soon. Microsoft will also keep pushing. I hear they have an even scheduled for sometimes this month.
anothermaninyourlife t1_jc9y6ki wrote
Reply to comment by logicnreason93 in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
Eh, it's better for the market to grow with whatever information that is already out there (more unique innovation).
It's not necessary for them (Open A.I) to disclose every new step that they have taken to improve on their AI especially when the market is still trying to catch up with version 3.
PossessionStandard42 t1_jc9x4rd wrote
It can also get score above 90% of test takers on SAT.
seweso t1_jc9usa9 wrote
Reply to comment by Rohit901 in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
Bing chat seems to be something in between 3.5 and 4... but also with a bigger but worse dataset or something.
Edit: I was wrong, bing uses gpt 4.
seweso t1_jc9u8eq wrote
Reply to comment by techni_24 in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
What they are doing isn't far ahead of what is already in the open. Their performance can be easily be explained by quality data + shitton of gpus and good controls (to prevent weird shit).
The more logical explanation is that they wanna sell this as soon as possible before it's in the open.
MrTimscampi t1_jc9tv1h wrote
Reply to comment by donnygel in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
Quite ironic for a company named OpenAI.
seweso t1_jc9t8d5 wrote
Reply to comment by Malkiot in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
my bet is on this ^.
[deleted] t1_jc9stif wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jc9sl3m wrote
Reply to comment by lego_office_worker in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
It’s just your standard western-centric tool limitation. It doesn’t do that for women, Romani people, Jewish people etc. But ask it about Sardars (Sikhs) and it has its way… and it’s exactly as bad as you would expect.
Malkiot t1_jc9sjk7 wrote
Reply to comment by donnygel in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
Or it's so damn simple that just talking about it would let others replicate it.
logicnreason93 t1_jc9rj0k wrote
Reply to comment by anothermaninyourlife in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
Then they should rename their company to Close A.I
Cutecumber_Roll t1_jc9pu93 wrote
Reply to comment by jonhasglasses in Why CRISPR babies are still too risky — embryo studies highlight technical challenges by Proteasome1
We've been having the should we discussion for thousands of years. Why would we not choose to self select desirable traits for our species?
[deleted] t1_jc9omyc wrote
[deleted]
ubiquitous_raven t1_jc9np94 wrote
Reply to comment by Rohit901 in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
I agree with you. Bing has been a constant disappointment.
[deleted] t1_jcabrb3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel
[removed]