Recent comments in /f/technology

donnygel OP t1_jc8ybbh wrote

Reply to comment by EmbarrassedHelp in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel

Its definitely not an open source approach to AI. Monetization of AI is the goal here, which is disappointing. I can only assume the intellectual property that they're trying to protect contains some groundbreaking architecture that gives them a bleeding edge advantage over other AI architectures?

72

EmbarrassedHelp t1_jc8xjg5 wrote

Reply to OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel

They can claim whatever they like, but it shouldn't be taken seriously if they hide the important details behind fake excuses of "safety". From the paper:

> Given both the competitive landscape and the safety implications of large-scale models like GPT-4, this report contains no further details about the architecture (including model size), hardware, training compute, dataset construction, training method, or similar.

77

KickBassColonyDrop t1_jc7y8kg wrote

Reply to comment by CountingDownTheDays- in Why CRISPR babies are still too risky — embryo studies highlight technical challenges by Proteasome1

The thing is. One way or another, selective genetic engineering and eugenics wars will be a thing in the future. If not on this planet, then in space or on the moon or beyond. If the civilization is to ever advance beyond the boundary of this planet, genetic engineering is inevitable.

4