Recent comments in /f/technology
HildemarTendler t1_jc71hs7 wrote
Reply to comment by jonhasglasses in Why CRISPR babies are still too risky — embryo studies highlight technical challenges by Proteasome1
We've had that conversation and its a resounding yes. Giving people a better life from their first moments is a no brainer.
You're probably more focus on the weird things like making kids taller or whatever. Rich people are going to do rich people things. We'll see how that works out.
jonhasglasses t1_jc70rwx wrote
Reply to Why CRISPR babies are still too risky — embryo studies highlight technical challenges by Proteasome1
Ummmmmm, are we just blowing right past “should we” to see if “could we” might work? I’m sure we will revisit “should we” once we figured out it’s possible I’m sure. Right?
kobbled t1_jc70649 wrote
Reply to comment by mega153 in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
It's largely performative
Proteasome1 OP t1_jc6ys7c wrote
Reply to Why CRISPR babies are still too risky — embryo studies highlight technical challenges by Proteasome1
The Third International Summit on Human Genome Editing has concluded that current gene editing techniques are not safe enough to be used in human embryos for reproductive purposes
Guigsy t1_jc6cqp8 wrote
Reply to comment by Additional_Ad_2778 in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
I cant say which department/s it was/is. Security is incredibly tight. But its not MI5 or anything like that :D A lot of civil servants mostly at the moment. But iv spoken to people you would put in that list. But not MP's or ministers. Although we were warned they might call if they wanted to. I guess they are too important and have too many assistants to deal with us directly :D
One of the locations i worked had an OG enigma machine i walked past every day. which was cool.
My security training lasted a week when i started. 3 strike rule enforced by security officers who would do occasional patrols arround the place. left pc unlocked, strike, printed something and left it at the printer because it was a mistake and didnt shread it. strike. left any documents on your desk at the end of the day not locked away. strike. 3rd strike was instant dismissal.
My security trainer told a story of when he went to his gym and over heard a guy talking to a fried about where he worked. (This was some time ago when people were not QUITE as concious about security as they should have been.) He didnt mention what he did. mention the place by name or too many specifics. But he could tell from some of the bits he did say that he worked in the building. So he waited for him to leave. took a note of the registration number of his car. Then when he got into work looked up his reg number which was recorded when he comes in the gates and cross referenced it with his security pass. Took his name and went and found his desk. He said he sat down next to him. introduced himself and asked him how how his session at the gym was. Which got a confused reaction. He didnt get a strike. But got given a sturn warning to be more carefull about exactly what he said in public places.
WitheringAwayBro t1_jc69ydw wrote
Reply to The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
Why the fuck are they using government devices for entertainment lmfao
landwomble t1_jc66wl7 wrote
Reply to comment by GetOutOfTheWhey in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
Any corp that runs BYOD should be using Conditional Access / InTune or a 3rd party equivalent. You sign into mail/calendar etc and it enrolls your device, turns on and enforces strong PIN, encryption, remote wipe etc.
This is very much a Solved Problem.
icklejop t1_jc65hw1 wrote
Reply to The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
more interested in any government having to use officially recorded media, whatever that may be, so it is open to scrutiny. You can bet your house that WhatsApp Meta can and are passing on data to the American intelligence services, which doesn't particularly concern me, but a lack of transparency for the British public is shocking
Additional_Ad_2778 t1_jc621b7 wrote
Reply to comment by Guigsy in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
There seem to be plenty of reports of people using personal devices for government related business. That might have a lot to do with it. Did your work cover MPs, ministers, consultants and similar positions?
British_Monarchy t1_jc61055 wrote
Reply to comment by Additional_Ad_2778 in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
I am pretty liberal when it comes to state involvement in my life. From CCTV to banning sugary drinks I want as much freedom to do what I want as possible as long as it doesn't infringe or harm someone else.
But using the "I'll do what I want" on national security is a big fucking leap that just screams either selfishness or ignorance.
SongofHappyMan t1_jc5s6f3 wrote
Reply to comment by DctrGizmo in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
It's too late.
cowvin t1_jc5frhf wrote
Reply to comment by Mr_ToDo in Twitter’s $42,000-per-Month API Prices Out Nearly Everyone | Tiers will start at $500,000 a year for access to 0.3 percent of the company’s tweets. Researchers say that’s too much for too little data by Hrmbee
How much you want to bet that right-wingers will still have access but left-wingers will have to pay?
GetOutOfTheWhey t1_jc5bqtk wrote
Reply to comment by mymar101 in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
Because most of the time they are your personal ones.
The reality is that most government officials have bring your own device phones.
Only the real top bananas get government phones.
Intelligent-Use-7313 t1_jc5596u wrote
Amaranthine t1_jc558ao wrote
Reply to comment by UnkleRinkus in Twitter’s $42,000-per-Month API Prices Out Nearly Everyone | Tiers will start at $500,000 a year for access to 0.3 percent of the company’s tweets. Researchers say that’s too much for too little data by Hrmbee
I already see “Rate Limit Exceeded” in the official Twitter iOS app lmao. I’m sure it’s much easier to get around this using a normal browser, but it’s probably going to be made more and more annoying over time -_-
uglypatiofurniture t1_jc51g9j wrote
Reply to comment by pilat909 in Twitter’s $42,000-per-Month API Prices Out Nearly Everyone | Tiers will start at $500,000 a year for access to 0.3 percent of the company’s tweets. Researchers say that’s too much for too little data by Hrmbee
I've seen others say that scraping data would give roughly 0.01%. I think this is just a negotiating point for Elon. Hopefully, this blows up in his face like everything else he's done with Twitter.
GetOutOfTheWhey t1_jc512rh wrote
Reply to comment by landwomble in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
The truth? It's really all just bring your own device in with these government officials.
And the actual government devices that are provided likely will have the things you just described. But the vast majority are BYOD and people are just being told to remove it.
Whether they do or not, is not possible to be checked because it is BYOD.
matiyarosz t1_jc4s2mo wrote
Reply to comment by landwomble in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
They do though, large parts of HMG use InTune as the MDM solution.
And as you say, all they have to do is flick a switch, deploy a new policy and InTune will do everything for them.
Guigsy t1_jc4jvu8 wrote
Reply to comment by Culverin in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
Iv worked IT helpdesks for years serving multiple different gov departments... They don't allow it. And you don't have access to install anything for the app store or the Apple store. If you want an app that isn't o365 stuff you have to request it be pushed to you. Iv never seen Facebook. Tiktok YouTube or anything like that present on a device. And you can't visit the web based versions because they are blocked by browsing policy's.
There must be more behind this headline than it initially reads. Something like changing wording on an outdated policy to define specifics or something like that. Unless they are singling out politicians who may be deemed too important to upset.
Guigsy t1_jc4i8sb wrote
Reply to comment by landwomble in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
Iv worked on IT helpdesks for 3 different government agencies/departments in recent times. And currently do. You can't install twitter, Facebook, YouTube or pretty much anything unless you request it and it gets authorised and then pushed out to your device. You don't get access to ether the android or apple stores to download apps.
So there must be more to this than the headline let's on.
ISAMU13 t1_jc48h0f wrote
Reply to comment by legendofsteve in Twitter’s $42,000-per-Month API Prices Out Nearly Everyone | Tiers will start at $500,000 a year for access to 0.3 percent of the company’s tweets. Researchers say that’s too much for too little data by Hrmbee
The Suboxone of Reddit is much better.
scofieldr t1_jc478z8 wrote
Reply to comment by DayTradingEdge in Twitter’s $42,000-per-Month API Prices Out Nearly Everyone | Tiers will start at $500,000 a year for access to 0.3 percent of the company’s tweets. Researchers say that’s too much for too little data by Hrmbee
Apparently you are already sucking Elon's dick, so he can skip you
skilliard7 t1_jc45rs8 wrote
Reply to comment by 757DrDuck in Twitter’s $42,000-per-Month API Prices Out Nearly Everyone | Tiers will start at $500,000 a year for access to 0.3 percent of the company’s tweets. Researchers say that’s too much for too little data by Hrmbee
You say this speaking on a platform full of average people... I don't understand your point
757DrDuck t1_jc43w1e wrote
Reply to comment by skilliard7 in Twitter’s $42,000-per-Month API Prices Out Nearly Everyone | Tiers will start at $500,000 a year for access to 0.3 percent of the company’s tweets. Researchers say that’s too much for too little data by Hrmbee
Ever been on Facebook? We’re better off on networks without average people.
Deranged40 t1_jc7bzbv wrote
Reply to comment by jonhasglasses in Why CRISPR babies are still too risky — embryo studies highlight technical challenges by Proteasome1
Why shouldn't we?
If given the chance to "Play god", I'm going to. Easy choice.
e: Can you not make a well formed answer to "Why shouldn't we?"