Recent comments in /f/technology
whatistheformat t1_jbdwaye wrote
Reply to comment by Dragoniel in How Reddit is getting simpler — and dealing with TikTok, with chief product officer Pali Bhat by BronzeHeart92
agreed. I check out the new layout occasionally and encounter multiple issues within minutes. From a usability standpoint it's a nightmare. Clearly they feel the pressure to compete in the doomscrolling marketplace, but If they force reddit to be just another tiktok, it will lose what makes it unique and worth going to. Searching the web with the term "reddit" is probably their biggest marketing coup rn, if they bust up communities they will be losing massive value.
Dragoniel t1_jbdvvkk wrote
Reply to comment by Hrmbee in How Reddit is getting simpler — and dealing with TikTok, with chief product officer Pali Bhat by BronzeHeart92
> Lots of people use Google to find things on Reddit, which is often used as a criticism of Google’s search quality. I wanted to know if Pali thinks Google is vulnerable in search, if Reddit can become a primary search engine for people, and most importantly, what he took from Google’s culture and what he left behind in organizing Reddit’s product team.
That paragraph makes no sense. Google is used to search for things on Reddit, because Reddit's own search is useless. How is that criticism for Google...? Nothing that Reddit will ever do to its search will be able to square up to Google's tools. There's no way in hell.
Dragoniel t1_jbduxf4 wrote
Reply to How Reddit is getting simpler — and dealing with TikTok, with chief product officer Pali Bhat by BronzeHeart92
They talk a lot about all the new features and user-centric design and all that and here I am still using old.reddit.com mode, because every time I resolve to get used to the "new" fancy design, I give up and return to the original within an hour. It's fucking godawful. If they ever discontinued the old mode, I'd just quit reddit altogether the same day.
So, all this talk sounds empty to me.
Hrmbee t1_jbdurhl wrote
Reply to How Reddit is getting simpler — and dealing with TikTok, with chief product officer Pali Bhat by BronzeHeart92
>Pali Bhat joined Reddit from Google about a year ago — he’s actually Reddit’s first-ever chief product officer, which is pretty surprising considering that Reddit is a series of product experiences: the reading experience, the writing experience, and importantly, the moderation experience. One thing we always say on Decoder is that the real product of any social network is content moderation, and Reddit is maybe the best example of that: every subreddit is shaped by volunteer moderators who use the tools Reddit builds for them. So Pali has a big job bringing all these products together and making them better, all while trying to grow Reddit as a platform. > >Pali wanted to come on Decoder to talk about his new focus on making Reddit simpler: simpler for new users to join and find interesting conversations; simpler to participate in those threads; and simpler to moderate. We talked a lot about the tension between what new users need when they’re learning to use Reddit and what Reddit power users want — if the goal is to grow the site, you run the risk of irritating your oldest users with change. > >We also talked about video. Reddit is rolling out a dedicated video feed, which sounds a lot like an attempt to compete with TikTok, which every social network is trying to do — and we talked quite a bit about Google and search. Lots of people use Google to find things on Reddit, which is often used as a criticism of Google’s search quality. I wanted to know if Pali thinks Google is vulnerable in search, if Reddit can become a primary search engine for people, and most importantly, what he took from Google’s culture and what he left behind in organizing Reddit’s product team.
This was an interesting interview. Of particular interest to me was that before Pali there was no chief product officer. Even without that though the product team(s) seemed to be doing a passable job at the very least. Hopefully this new director impacts the user experience in a positive way in the coming months and years.
Zealousideal-Foot312 t1_jbdtxfp wrote
I deleted FB the other day so tired of the meta crap!
[deleted] t1_jbdtnjo wrote
Reply to How Reddit is getting simpler — and dealing with TikTok, with chief product officer Pali Bhat by BronzeHeart92
Can't take seriously an article that talks in good terms about mods.
johnnyappleb t1_jbdpy82 wrote
Reply to comment by filthmrchristian in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
retail? Like the VR headset?
JoieDe_Vivre_ t1_jbdkrt5 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Dude imagine defending Mao and comparing it to tech lay offs.
Pretty good bit though
tretower424 t1_jbdgxiq wrote
Reply to comment by whatweshouldcallyou in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Yeah, nobody can see through that ruse.
[deleted] t1_jbdetbz wrote
Reply to comment by SwitchAny5927 in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
[removed]
filthmrchristian t1_jbde2mw wrote
Reply to comment by coffeesippingbastard in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Reality labs is chaotic
SwitchAny5927 t1_jbd7gs5 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
bet they'll go back within the year.
[deleted] t1_jbd0fj7 wrote
Reply to comment by Firechess in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
[deleted]
Firechess t1_jbcww05 wrote
Reply to comment by uberinstinct in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
And McDonalds killed even more people with diabetes. Welcome to human beings becoming shitty through excess. But I bet you don't even know who McDonald's CEO is. Or even Nestlé. The only thing that stands out about Zuckerberg is that he made his company from his dorm room, and therefore he gets the dishonor of being more evil than Mao Zedong.
nubsauce87 t1_jbctau0 wrote
Tell us your company is failing without telling us your company is failing...
[deleted] t1_jbcnzof wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jbcnvp2 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jbcl2ko wrote
Reply to comment by DoesntWantToBe in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
[deleted]
whitexheat t1_jbckve9 wrote
Reply to comment by DoesntWantToBe in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
I work at a tech company in a non-programming role and this is true for us as well. I ask a different set of questions for anyone coming from a FAANG to sus out if they've been scrappy and done a breadth of work. They're all smart and capable people, but like you said, they've often have more resources at their disposal and haven't had to wear 5 different hats in a day.
Also, in my field, a lot of people got hired at FAANGs straight out of PhD programs and there are some issues with that as well. Like clearly bright people, but don't always have the soft skill sets we're looking for so I tend to hire from similarly-sized companies.
pathlessRoamer t1_jbcksar wrote
Reply to comment by sleafordbods in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Do I count as a DAU/MAU if I just log in daily, or do I need to post/interact with a post?
TrainsDontHunt t1_jbcjduw wrote
Reply to comment by SlowMotionPanic in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
I don't know all the laws, but I believe a company is charged less for unemployment for a lay off but the counter is they can't hire for the same position for a year, or if they do it has to be offered to the lay off people first.
TrainsDontHunt t1_jbcj2md wrote
Reply to comment by DoesntWantToBe in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
This can be especially true if the company is hiring directly out of college, and then putting them in one small area of specific tech.
TrainsDontHunt t1_jbciq6s wrote
Reply to comment by mymar101 in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
It's nice to see friendly disagrements.
TrainsDontHunt t1_jbcigir wrote
Reply to comment by IH4v3Nothing2Say in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Nobody does. They drag the corpse through the tunnel system to the inner world.
DevAnalyzeOperate t1_jbdxin9 wrote
Reply to comment by zUdio in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
The main reason I wanted to do this was because of Forbes reporting on TikTok spying on journalists. https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilybaker-white/2022/12/22/tiktok-tracks-forbes-journalists-bytedance/?sh=607f09b47da5
I'll also point out that if you're concerned about the free market - why are you more concerned with this potential ban in America than the ongoing ban of YouTube and Twitter and Facebook and Google in China? A free market doesn't exist and there is a one sided trade barrier. Also banning a business that's a competitor to a western business, even doing that explicitly for that reason, particularly when china has already enacted similar trade barriers (thus meaning there would be no breaking of any treaty under international law) can indeed be enforceable and legal. If you ban TikTok from the mainstream it won't have the nessecary content and social network to survive.
In terms of being ethical/moral/reasonable, my concern is actually the impact it would have on younger generations, I don't know why the fuck anybody would be concerned about what Meta thought about the issue. TikTok is a massive part of youth culture. These are all subjective things though. all I can say is objectively keeping China in control of the social media platform most western youth use is objectively a huge intelligence boon as well as an economic and military advantage.
The biggest argument I will give against the sale is that China already moved their datacenters to the US so it might simply be overkill to also force them to say, divest TikTok to a US owned entity in exchange for a payout.