Recent comments in /f/technology
abofh t1_jban76z wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Most of them -> most companies; This is like round 20 something for valley lay-offs in the last 5-12 months. But if you prefer? markets
mowotlarx t1_jbajanx wrote
Reply to comment by sleafordbods in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Sign ups don't necessarily indicate usage. Meta did this interesting thing where a lot of third party sites - like Archive Social, a site that archives social media pages for federal/state/local government entities - require that you create a Facebook page in order to archive Instagram. Not only that, you must go through Meta Business Suite and create one or more new "profiles" to link to the Instagram. They encourage you to create more and more filler pages. Suddenly you have a single user with multiple "profiles" or "pages" they manage whether or not they are being used. It's a clever scheme.
sleafordbods t1_jbajaex wrote
Reply to comment by pathlessRoamer in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Daily active users (DAU) and monthly active users (MAU) are exactly what you’re looking for
[deleted] t1_jbaj20z wrote
Reply to comment by squeevey in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Yeah, fire all 80k people!
morbihann t1_jbaiqo7 wrote
And between 6 and 12 months from now, the Zuck will be scrambling to find capable people to work for Meta.
[deleted] t1_jbaifth wrote
Reply to comment by abofh in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
How can you know so much detail about a round of layoffs that hasn't happened yet?
pathlessRoamer t1_jbagy08 wrote
Reply to comment by sleafordbods in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
This is interesting, I'd like to see actual usage stats, rather than sign ups, which can easily be manipulated. Though anecdotal, I've casually surveyed people I know who still have an account, and they all complain about the same thing - not much content, only ads and suggested public posts.
Wonder who is still signing up, or possibly they are clumping it with Instagram users, who use FB's login credentials.
nur5e t1_jbag6sr wrote
Reply to comment by shrillbill in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Really shows how asinine the concept of paternal leave is.
Haycock-spiney t1_jbac7ye wrote
Seems like it was only a couple of years ago he was hiring like crazy for the "glorious" 3D immersive paradigm.
shrillbill t1_jbabc11 wrote
Reply to comment by chrisdh79 in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
So he's laying off 1000s of people as fast as possible so he can relax with his family. What a piece of shit
teedeeguantru t1_jbab5fl wrote
Put out a shitty product, get fired.
sleafordbods t1_jba9w06 wrote
Reply to comment by FreezingRobot in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Not just superficially though - as advertisers bail from twitter, they have TikTok, fb/insta, Google as their alternative major options.
abofh t1_jba9mx4 wrote
Reply to comment by SparkStormrider in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
That's the funniest part, most of them are keeping senior people to avoid lawsuits, but in the process eliminating the motivated unvested. Whomp whomp
sleafordbods t1_jba9m99 wrote
FreezingRobot t1_jba7lfp wrote
Zuck must be happy that Elon Musk has been taking all the heat off Meta for the past 6 months or so.
[deleted] t1_jba6p44 wrote
Reply to comment by dungone in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
[removed]
dungone t1_jba69i1 wrote
Reply to comment by whatweshouldcallyou in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
We all know that without Fox News and Facebook, you would not have any friends. Your world would only be filled by people like me, telling you the truth, telling you that you're nuts. That's why it's so important to you to defend Fox News and Facebook. Literally like an addict when their family tries to throw away their stash. What would you do without all the right wing lies that you've built your entire world around?
whatweshouldcallyou t1_jba5ef7 wrote
Reply to comment by dungone in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
I don't think that logical reasoning is your friend.
dungone t1_jba5921 wrote
Reply to comment by whatweshouldcallyou in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Yep, I know. Brother, you don't have to convince me twice that you've cut out the middle man and gone straight for the fully concentrated good stuff. You're hooked up to the online feeds straight from Russia and China.
whatweshouldcallyou t1_jba2v4h wrote
Reply to comment by dungone in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Lol. Someone is a fan of dumb assumptions. The number of hours of cable news television that I have watched in the last year can be counted on one hand, without the need for any fingers.
But keep assuming.
dungone t1_jba2hp5 wrote
Reply to comment by whatweshouldcallyou in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Yes, we already know the nonsense that Tucker, Hanity, and Russian intelligence services told you to think.
You’re probably going to need therapy once you realize that Fox News is getting it’s ass handed to you in court for lying to people such as yourself. If you are so smart that you think you can find proof of Jewish Space Lasers programming the minds of the “left wing” billionaire corporate owners, I suggest you sue CNN, ABC, NBC, etc., yourself. Will love to see your proof, will be very entertaining. Until then, actual provable disinformation and anti-American incitement is being spread by Fox News and Facebook.
whatweshouldcallyou t1_jba11wx wrote
Reply to comment by dungone in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
No, they are not owned by conservative billionaires. They're owned by large corporations who have been coopted by the woke left. And they are spreading massive amounts of lies.
whatweshouldcallyou t1_jba0e1c wrote
Reply to comment by whatweshouldcallyou in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Shall we hold them accountable for their lies too?
dungone t1_jba0cic wrote
Reply to comment by whatweshouldcallyou in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
So how about them? They are all right wing outlets owned by conservative billionaires. But they are not as bad as Fox News and Facebook in spreading Chinese and Russian propaganda, instigating violent insurrections, and filling impressionable redneck minds with nonsense.
filthmrchristian t1_jbanhfm wrote
Reply to comment by morbihann in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
I doubt it…there is a lot of dead wood in Facebook to get rid of.