Recent comments in /f/technology
Independent-Bowl1178 t1_jb3r0lk wrote
Reply to New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
I knew being a conspiracy theorist would pan out some day.
Inquisitive_idiot t1_jb3dbwc wrote
Reply to comment by littleMAS in Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
That doesn’t negate the benefits of toolsets like ChatGPT in the interim.
Sometimes it gets the right answer and sometimes it gives me a terrible answers / code examples but overall I like having it in my toolbox and I like the improved relevancy that I’m getting so far.
I don’t think it’s the end all be all but, even as a stepping stone to something greater, it’s pretty useful and provides value.
Inquisitive_idiot t1_jb3c80q wrote
Reply to comment by m0le in Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
The call? Cancelled 😕
CardioKillsYourGains t1_jb1fdqk wrote
Reply to comment by Secure-Frosting in Brave Search launches an AI-powered summarization feature by Necessary_Tadpole692
Ok but you could just use Firefox, which is faster and also has that stuff...
erosram t1_jb18y1s wrote
Reply to comment by grenamier in Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
I think it was because they were getting a little backlash on using machines to spam call people, even if it was for useful data.
Secure-Frosting t1_jb03ooz wrote
Reply to comment by CardioKillsYourGains in Brave Search launches an AI-powered summarization feature by Necessary_Tadpole692
but way less spyware and activity tracking bloat
CardioKillsYourGains t1_jazrrl6 wrote
Reply to comment by Secure-Frosting in Brave Search launches an AI-powered summarization feature by Necessary_Tadpole692
Brave is based on chrome, mate
[deleted] t1_jayumvk wrote
Secure-Frosting t1_jayog3b wrote
Reply to comment by PEVEI in Brave Search launches an AI-powered summarization feature by Necessary_Tadpole692
chrome is the slowest horse mate
ppppolo t1_jay2wq5 wrote
Kudos to them for actually putting references
Jjayguy23 t1_jaxwrr3 wrote
Reply to comment by grenamier in Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
Wow, I remember that!!!
PEVEI t1_jaxrhzz wrote
Awww... the slowest horse finally limped across the finish line.
littleMAS t1_jaxk7z1 wrote
Reply to Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
The problem with using generative AI like ChatGPT is that it does not lead you to what you are looking for. To do that, it would be asking more questions than providing answers. Without the dialog, the context of a query is never factored into the search. When AI can determine the context of a query and refine it to the true need and its parameters (e.g., timeframe, cost, quality, purpose, etc.), then it becomes a concierge of discovery. However, to do this requires a lot more processing power and storage than what drives ChatGPT.
geordilaforge t1_jaxgxlj wrote
Reply to comment by grenamier in Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
That is a great question. Probably failed spectacularly, but I love the idea.
Kanden_27 t1_jaxak79 wrote
Reply to Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
It's about not being evil.
mtcwby t1_jax5ofi wrote
Reply to comment by JadeitePenguin1 in Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
And obviously you haven't really used AI and don't understand the strengths and weaknesses. I've got a product coming out in a few weeks that shaves the time that would be spent manually from eight hours to 10 minutes with a better result. And it's tedious work to do manually.
WimbleWimble t1_jawvzur wrote
Reply to Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
Google has probably already planned to brick Bard.
Google could brick the housebricks in your house.
WimbleWimble t1_jawu8do wrote
Reply to FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
The Link OP has provided relates to a denial at the end of 2021 / beginning of 2022 and bears zero relation to the current 2023 application/tech
Due-Resident-4588 t1_jawtytc wrote
Reply to comment by PunchCakee in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
If you say so. I’ll let you test the brain Chips first then.
[deleted] t1_jawtrcq wrote
grenamier t1_jawt4tk wrote
Reply to Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
Whatever happened to that demo of a Google AI calling a hairdresser and making an appointment with a live human over the phone? Did that go anywhere?
JadeitePenguin1 t1_jawswaf wrote
Reply to comment by mtcwby in Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
"The nuance in results is more refined."
It's just search.....it's a gimmick and nothing else that's all this AI is.
mtcwby t1_jawpu44 wrote
Reply to comment by JadeitePenguin1 in Google execs tell employees in testy all-hands meeting that Bard A.I. isn’t just about search by jikli
The nuance in results is more refined. I've been playing with the chatgpt version and then the Bing version last night. Chatgpt seems to write better answers at the moment linguistically with Bing asking followup questions. The goal really seems to be an aggregated, detailed search experience. The biggest danger is they get it wrong but people accept the large amount of detail as somehow true without digging deeper because it's easy.
PunchCakee t1_jawp92e wrote
Reply to comment by Due-Resident-4588 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
I dont know why you say that? Nearly every single product that has hit the market has been reverse engineered by a lot of people including the most elite hardware developers and embedded systems engineers.
The possibility of something like a remote code execution happening is so so slim.
downwardtrajectory t1_jb3r6qr wrote
Reply to New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
And/or because of massive revenue loss.