Recent comments in /f/technology
einmaldrin_alleshin t1_jar71g5 wrote
Reply to comment by DangerousAd1731 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
Lithium batteries are the standard type of battery used in things like pacemakers. They are they dense and very safe.
Of course, not to be confused with lithium ion batteries.
reconrose t1_jar63hy wrote
Reply to comment by Plzbanmebrony in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
The monkey slaying, not so much
it_administrator01 t1_jar5d0m wrote
Reply to comment by Due-Resident-4588 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
> Your thoughts could be controlled
big tech have already been doing this for a decade
it_administrator01 t1_jar5a8c wrote
Reply to comment by Plzbanmebrony in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
or just leave it on because not everyone has things to hide from police
ACCount82 t1_jaqzddd wrote
Reply to comment by DneSokas in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
First Neuralink devices are expected to work like that. The device only scans the brain for inputs, and uses those inputs to drive peripherals like virtual mouse or keyboard. No neural feedback involved.
We don't really know what the limits of the no-feedback approach are. It could be that you would be able to achieve superhuman typing speeds on those first gen systems, with lots of practice - or that a more in-depth approach would be required for that.
ACCount82 t1_jaqz6jy wrote
Reply to comment by TastyLaksa in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
Lots of things. Human brain is painfully limited and borderline inadequate for the requirements the modern world puts on it.
Of course, the current state of the art is nowhere near being able to improve on that. But that's now. BCI tech is really promising still - too many human limitations lie in the brain, and we can't do anything about them without cracking the skull open.
ACCount82 t1_jaqylzs wrote
Reply to comment by BurningPenguin in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
Not good enough to be practical. Not enough power output, not enough long term stability. Power cells are the only option for powering something like Neuralink - at least for now.
ACCount82 t1_jaqyjik wrote
Reply to comment by Plzbanmebrony in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
Not getting regulatory approval the first time around is a fairly usual thing. Especially for a new product in a fairly new field.
Plzbanmebrony t1_jaqx8ha wrote
Reply to comment by ImaginaryEffort4409 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
Turn that feature off. Cops can make you unlock it but they can't make you give them a password.
Tony_TNT t1_jaquvb8 wrote
Reply to FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
I have multiple scars and had a few broken bones. Body almost always can heal to some extent, but never fully and there's always some marks, inconveniences and imperfections. Can't imagine willingly wanting someone to rummage around in your head to implant some new half-assed tech into it and hope it almost works at best and doesn't make you a vegetable at worst.
BurningPenguin t1_jaqnecf wrote
Reply to comment by DangerousAd1731 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
Aren't there some experiments with using the body heat to produce power or something?
BurningPenguin t1_jaqn8w3 wrote
Reply to comment by Washout22 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
More like Lex Luthor fighting his equally evil brother
DneSokas t1_jaqn2n8 wrote
Reply to comment by RaccoonProcedureCall in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
You wouldn't neccesarily have to take that kind of risk with a brain interface, its pretty easy to make a circuit that can output only so you control the computer with your thoughts but there's no return line so it still has to show the information back to you on a screen. A screen on you're eyeball if you want to be all fancy and integrated about it but a screen with no direct input to your brain beyond the usual visual means.
This is probably actually the prefered way to set up such a system because the actual implanted parts are pretty much just your peripherals meaning you can have the actual device be external which saves you a lot of unnecesary surgery every time computers get better.
Of course musk is the same guy who's proposing indentured servitude on mars so he's probably going down the mind control route if he can.
ImaginaryEffort4409 t1_jaqk4rr wrote
Reply to FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
Meanwhile it's 2023 and my brand new $600 phone can't even reliably recognize my fingerprint lol
RaccoonProcedureCall t1_jaqjl6r wrote
Reply to comment by wambulancer in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
Yeah, I get the excitement there is for this tech, but it seems to me that even the slightest scrutiny reveals grave risks at practically every level from immediate health hazards to potential societal problems. I think there are some non-technological challenges that really ought to be addressed before we consider incorporating this kind of technology into our lives.
RaccoonProcedureCall t1_jaqiwnb wrote
Reply to comment by moses420bush in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
It’s also scary to think of a world in which this technology becomes necessary to be competitive. I hate to imagine what would happen if no company was willing to hire someone who can’t interact with a computer as quickly as they can think, yet some people still refused to use the technology for various reasons.
Wakkoooo t1_jaqdqds wrote
Reply to comment by recon89 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
The neuralink subreddit is filled with guinea pigs, it's insane lol
moses420bush t1_jaq5txp wrote
Reply to comment by TastyLaksa in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
The master control chip
moses420bush t1_jaq5qv2 wrote
Reply to comment by recon89 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
They'll open a facility in some country with terrible regulations.
moses420bush t1_jaq5ook wrote
Reply to comment by Due-Resident-4588 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
You wouldn't but kids born into a world where it is normal wouldn't think twice. Scary.
Washout22 t1_jaq5h0k wrote
Reply to comment by jampapi in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
Sweet! Mars robot boxing. Judging by their space companies, I'll take Elon.
Bezos is likely lex luthor.
jampapi t1_jaq5871 wrote
Reply to comment by recon89 in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
I think a backup Elon (or a fleet of them) is exactly why he’s doing this. That old idiom about a man and his wealth (“you can’t take it with you”) may be nearing its expiration date. Imagine Elon-droids still utilizing that fortune 200 years from now, on Mars, in space, fistfighting Bezos-bot, the possibilities are endless
[deleted] t1_jaq2416 wrote
josefx t1_japxi0s wrote
Reply to comment by wambulancer in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
The good news is that this is neuralink we are talking about. With the amount of monkey brains they went through the most likely outcome is a painful death, not eternal enslavement to twitter.
Plzbanmebrony t1_jaramgs wrote
Reply to comment by reconrose in FDA reportedly denied Neuralink's request to begin human trials of its brain implant | The agency cited 'dozens' of safety issues that must be resolved before moving forward. by chrisdh79
All rumors. Most people don't even understand nerualink doesn't even install the chip or house the monkeys.