A cave painting of a horse will have been made by someone who has seen a horse. Fundamentally information has to come from somewhere, yet often the expectation set on AI seems to be "it's derivative because it can only draw a horse due to having a horse in its training set".

Yes, but this week it's back with an even more outrageous click-baity title, so we get to argue about it all over again.

I mean, this is not fun, but don't we give away our biometrics, facial recognition, voice recognitions, etc., with our smart phones on a daily basis? I'm sure the government has access to most of this information on a whim if they really need it.

Take the top of my skull off and hook me up.

It doesn’t say.

But the tool, like the CSAM takedown system, is coordinated with the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) and adult sites like Pornhub and Onlyfans use the CSAM tool, so even if they aren’t talking about it in the article they have something in place to prevent that. If it could easily be gamed to take down legal, consensually posted pornography featuring adults, Pornhub and Onlyfans would not be voluntarily using it.

Makes sense, Nvidia has been ridiculous with their 40 series.

[removed]

Nearly no one will do that. There are millions of gamers, and what? A few tens of thousands of people who are interested enough in AI content generation to buy a new GPU?

What mechanisms are in place to prevent people from submitting random photos just because they don’t like porn?

I don’t know how you want to define “understanding” when talking about a non-sentient LLM, but in my experiments, ChatGPT consistently gets reading comprehension questions from SAT practice tests right, and it’s well known that it has passed multiple professional exams. It’s nowhere close to infallible, but you’re also underselling what it does.

Thanks for that, now I can sleep at night.

[removed]

Smile for the camera!!

I bet it’s fail proof too…

[removed]

Men-tats?

Sounds to me like this rule was written by people with no clue what chatGPT is or how it works.

Not all writing is about the actual writing part, but mostly about comprehension, essay format, and proper citations. It’s like math, some might question why use a calculator for math, but it’s not about working math out by hand it’s about learning how to solve the problems.

Is this like the neuropacks from voyager?

USA rocketing all the way up to... [checks notes]... around 75th in the world for percentage of renewable electricity generation. Oh.

It's a pity schools can't teach people not to be bellends. You'd have benefited.

[removed]

Terminator level shit. It was bound to happen.

>We're talking about pre-university level education, talking about quoting sources is rather grandiose.

And yet that is precisely what we are talking about here, isn't it?

>Most kids just look at the textbook and wikipedia. ChatGPT is not even lowering the level. Hopefully the context wasn't lost on you.

Then he already has a source, no? What is the point of quoting the chatgpt rather than the source? I see the point of READING the chatgpt. Not QUOTING it. Apparently the context was indeed lost on you.

Mind if I asked why yall aren't airgapped?