Now we can find out if they're craven, stupid, or craven and stupid

Possibly. However the presumption will be that AI 'assisted' art is not entitled to copyright either. I expect the presumption to be rebuttable to some extent, but the author is going to have a difficult time trying to delineate what is and is not original to the author and not something that was added by the AI. In other words, copyright will be dragged into the morass of litigation over validity that patents go through.

Quite a few businesses treat IT as a thankless entity. Instead of a thank you it's "hey the environment is stable and everyone can work, why do we need to spend money on IT?"

Followed by "why the fuck is there an outage again? What do we even pay IT for?"

These will never get financed. Nuclear isnt happening anytime soon

It is kind of big, but they are selective as to who can join.

Thank you for your submission, but due to the high volume of spam coming from Medium.com and similar self-publishing sites, /r/Technology has opted to filter all of those posts pending mod approval. You may [message the moderators](/message/compose?to=/r/technology&subject=Request for post review) to request a review/approval provided you are not the author or are not associated at all with the submission. Thank you for understanding.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[removed]

We're probably somewhat on the same page. You beta tested to a select group. Their job was to report bugs while assuming the risk that the software was likely still somewhat buggy. Once things were pretty solid, you rolled it out.

I must say I have a hard time considering 363,000 paid installations a "beta."

The only answer is “Automatic Pilot” light that flashes on and off with a beeping sound.

Rule 3 of the sub is, "Submissions must use either the articles title and optionally a subtitle."

The title of the article is Conservative News Corp. empire says hackers were inside its network for 2 years

>Crucial And Devasting Legal Blow

Earth shattering legal news! On giantfreakingrobotDOTcom. Uh-huh.

Neither is Waymo. They’ve had lots of accidents even with being restricted to low-speed preplanned routes.

Has anyone cared to glance at ToS to see what the official position on said situation might be?

Beta testers are real customers. They’re just willing to follow certain rules and live with bugs in exchange for early access.

>did you mean purchaser?

Minority "master"?

The same corporation whose internal communications were quoted in the Dominion lawsuit followed by a one word summary by Dominion’s lawyers: “exactly”.

[removed]

Moving day again. Sigh.

Oohh so the "hackers" changed the prompts that the "entertainment reporters" (aka Fucker Carlson) read on air and the hackers made them say those things about the insurrection

Well I guess the cyber terrorists have all the January 6th videos then, thanks leader Mccarthy

Cave wall - history’s primal gallery.

Imitating nature.

[removed]

Cory Doctorow wrote about it in one of his books in the late ‘00s I think

They say no witness protection data was impacted, which means if I'm in witness protection I'm RUNNING!