[removed]

So if someone goes to a artschool, views art, or interacts with a creative property in any form, thier art is tainted by those preconceived works and therefore is not truly a creative work? All art is plagiarism but reconstructed and applied in small enough parts that you cannot tell it is.

[deleted]

[deleted]

>Crucial And Devasting Legal Blow

Terrible headline

The real answer is, Duh, it's just common sense

We need less artificial restriction of creativity, not more. Copyright law has expanded far beyond anything reasonable

Feels like a bigger story

Stick figures on cave walls.

Their internal.communications, for a start

Bro, your inability to differentiate what a company does vs what its stock does is comedy gold. Don't stop. I can't stop laughing.

This should be pretty easy to legislate against and they absolutely should do so. A computer program should not decide sentencing nor argue against the accused. I suppose if the defendant wants an AI lawyer the should have that right the same way they have the right to defend themselves.

>Look at the old woman and tell me that looks normal.

Hindsight bias.

We don't have legislation requiring cars to be safe enough to not kill 40k - 50k people a year. That's all of us together deciding it's not worthy.

Bro your head is so stuck in sand you must live in Egypt.

What useful information could you even get from the network of disinformation?

I remember when "beta" meant something you did before you released to "real" customers. Now, "beta" is legal-speak for "don't hold us responsible when it doesn't work or kills someone."

Here's the key problem with all of these "new nuclear" plans:

They cost a boatload of money up front, which they can't finance unless they get purchase commitments from utilities for sale of their output at above current rates. Because in the best hypothetical marketing case (pre-overruns) they are still the most costly way to generate electricity known to Man.

Consumers are already aware they can generate their own energy cheaper than their utility's current generation and transport with rooftop solar+battery, and those costs go only down. The savings is more than enough to pay for the interest on the financing too.

If utilities keep buying the most expensive generation available they will soon find they have nobody to sell it to because their customers already solved that problem for themselves and don't need them anymore.

How did it start then?

Stock value and a company's execution are two separate things. Trying to claim they're the same thing is peak clown show.

The execution profile of Tesla is rock solid. But, suuuuure, it's all tumbling down according to you.

Stop calling it FSD because it will never be.

How can they resolve this recall. They don’t know how to fix it.

You’re fucking hilariously blind if you seriously don’t see that Tesla’s stock performance is directly related to the shit Elon does.

yeah thats him, mr. four chan.

[deleted]

>To be fair 7 years is not "beta".

What? The beta came out October 2020

Please, please please let it be Anonymous.