Unless I’m mistaken these are the same hash functions social media platforms use to detect and take down copyrighted media, too.

What was your prompt if you don't mind sharing?

It's ripped straight from csi and/or criminal minds or something as well. And not a late episode either...

I wonder if it can do guitar tab.

Will they let the yuan float on international currency markets? lol

There is definitely a lot of fear around Reddit.

I'm guessing you didn't read your own article? People who can't run dx12 properly are having shading issues lmao.

I’d wager that the naval reactors also are highly classified and they would be extremely reluctant to let that technology out of their immediate control

Lots of young people use Instagram.

And if you read the article (what a concept LOL), this can be used for photos taken and spread on Facebook a long time ago. If your cad of a high school boyfriend posted the pictures you gave him 15-20 years ago on Facebook, you can send a hash to this thing to have them removed.

I don't disagree with any part of your analysis.

Okay now that's hilarious :)

[removed]

An honest question… a lot of artists say they are mad because AI scrapes the internet for photos and then uses the ‘knowledge’ to creat its own imagery with consent or credit. But isn’t that literally what all Artists do? Or many? Go to art school, study the greats, learn by copying their styles, then one day you become good enough to sit down and think of a ‘prompt’ in your head and make art.

I agree that AI art should be labeled as such, but I don’t think it’s any less of an art (especially when you’re working with photoshop to post process it etc) but why are artist mad about its existence and feel like there is ‘credit’ due?

Not trying to be contrarian, looking for a conversation and input from artists.

[deleted]

No, it wasn't that. And I don't think it was Adam Harvey. I'm thinking it was around 2006 or so, but I could be off by a bit. It was really the same, an art project with bright infrared LEDs that washed out the face on nighttime surveillance cameras. But he may not have invented it. The guy who did the hoodie says in another post that he read about the idea in a William Gibson novel.

No that should NOT be expected. Holy fuck raise your bar for expectations from a fucking Company dude.

Yes. Google's search has become increasingly terrible to point of being useless for anything that isn't popular and Microsoft's is still useable.

Google's search used to be the best by far. But, they haven't kept their eye on the ball.

How quickly before they are banned from all schools?

You should presume that anything you type into your keyboard on any website could potentially be captured, saved, processed and read. This is not a security fear, and The teams behind ChatGPT have never admitted to your queries being encrypted in any way.

You're reading it the wrong way.

7

O

^

—

y

"GASP! People don't buy things if they don't have money! Regardless of how many pop-ups we throw at them!!!! What do now????"

No matter what shit Stadia claimed upscaling 144p to 4k does not count.

Basically updating a ban list of queries that result in problematic responses from AIdolf Bingler.

The Metro UI, for how neat it was on mobile, was inevitably associated with the shittiest desktop release of all time. The reputation problem was clear.

OP you should change the title of your post. Microsoft doesn't control ChatGPT and the article is about their Bing one.

Everyone in the comments is right about what they're saying, but I still think it's important that it's clear they know who this article is about (we know not everyone reads the actual article, but your headline doesn't even match that of the article)