Recent comments in /f/technology

MaximumTemperature25 t1_ja98if8 wrote

Here's my exchange with ChatGPT just now:

Me: >Give me a good brunch recipe

​

Chat: >Sure! Here's a delicious and easy brunch recipe for you to try:
Avocado Toast with Poached Egg and Smoked Salmon
Ingredients:
2 slices of whole wheat bread
1 ripe avocado
1 lemon
Salt and pepper
2 large eggs
2 slices of smoked salmon
Fresh dill, for garnish (optional)
Instructions:
Start by toasting the bread until crispy.
While the bread is toasting, cut the avocado in half, remove the pit, and scoop out the flesh into a small bowl. Mash the avocado with a fork and add a squeeze of lemon juice and a pinch of salt and pepper.
In a large pot, bring water to a boil. Reduce the heat to a gentle simmer and add a tablespoon of vinegar to the water.
Crack each egg into a separate small bowl. Create a whirlpool in the simmering water by stirring the water in a circular motion with a spoon. Gently pour each egg into the center of the whirlpool, one at a time. Cook the eggs for about 3-4 minutes or until the whites are set and the yolks are still runny.
While the eggs are poaching, spread the avocado mixture evenly onto each slice of toast. Top each slice with a slice of smoked salmon.
Using a slotted spoon, remove the poached eggs from the water and place them on top of the smoked salmon.
Garnish with fresh dill, if desired, and serve immediately. Enjoy your delicious and nutritious brunch!

Perfectly acceptable recipe - nothing stands out as weird, and no filler. The timing of the steps might be a bit off.

So the question is - what prompt did you give it to get your result?

1

potatodrinker t1_ja96byc wrote

There's a type of ad called native that more closely resembles an article, or useful info for the user even if its still trying to link a brand to it. That might be better positioned to fit into an AI environment if done well and not rammed down users throats as a "sponsored response"

1

Gerzhus t1_ja95edw wrote

Reposting due to automod.

“Known as PDQ and TMK+PDQF, these technologies are part of a suite of tools we use at Facebook to detect harmful content, and there are other algorithms and implementations available to industry such as pHash, Microsoft’s PhotoDNA, aHash, and dHash. Our photo-matching algorithm, PDQ, owes much inspiration to pHash although was built from the ground up as a distinct algorithm with independent software implementation.”

I don’t know if all are open source, some might be proprietary.

Source: meta/fb blog post about how they fight CSAM.

1

HanaBothWays t1_ja94k72 wrote

We are talking about situations where a minor consented to share an intimate photo with another party having the understanding that the other party would not spread it around in public…and the other party did so anyway.

When this kind of thing happens between adults it’s called “revenge porn” and the person who spread the photo is often subject to civil or criminal liability for doing so.

If you are seriously arguing that someone deserves to have nude photos of themselves as a minor floating around to “teach them a lesson” when having it happen to them as an adult would make them victims of a crime, you probably need to log off for a while.

4

Rocketsloth t1_ja93ys7 wrote

The older grandma picture is obviously AI you can see the softening of the skin in the wrinkles it's unnatural looking how long did it take them to figure this out? The eyeball reflections are unnatural looking too. When you look at the faces there's overall too much softening of the hair and skin its unreal looking.

1