Recent comments in /f/technology

MetricVeil t1_ja7if4b wrote

>... it has made art a lot less meaningful.

I disagree. If anything, it has highlighted the increased meaning in human created art.

What has more, overall, value, an original painting by a human artist, a forged version of the painting by another human artist, a printed copy of the original picture or an AI generated interpretation of the original work?

Art is a direct expression of an artists humanity made using their skills and imagination and emotions. Generative art algorithms generate emotionless, sterile, images with no meaning or purpose.

16

Odysseyan t1_ja7cio4 wrote

The point is there will not be any NEW verified content this way. Think about newspaper sites. Why should they publish new articles when they don't get ad revenue since no one visits their site and just asks an AI what's new?

Sure the AI can just make up some headlines but whats the point of it then?

2