Recent comments in /f/technology
HolyAndOblivious t1_j9zcfok wrote
Reply to comment by Exshot32 in Windows 10 users are being offered a Windows 11 upgrade despite not meeting the requirements by GOR098
Lolno. The greatest problem for MS is to train the next generation of users. Think of your kids. What happens if people abandon ms and office en mass? Simply put, MS will be fucked on the pro market because people are not trained in windows and office.
linuxwes t1_j9zbzwg wrote
Reply to comment by Talqazar in Google making ‘terrible mistake’ in blocking Canadian news: Trudeau by Defiant_Race_7544
Google really screwed up in Oz, but now the precedent has been set and ultimately all the governments (except the US of course) will want a slice of the pie.
Alan976 t1_j9zbw8v wrote
Reply to comment by astromaddie in Windows 10 users are being offered a Windows 11 upgrade despite not meeting the requirements by GOR098
Nah; Microsoft skipped Windows 9 due to the sheer fact to avoid conflict with third-party code that searches for "Windows 9"
if(version.StartsWith("Windows 9"))
{ /* 95 and 98 */ } else {
Also, the whole"odd number Windows releases are bad" is just arbitrary, someone's preference, and asinine.
Alan976 t1_j9zb6ee wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Windows 10 users are being offered a Windows 11 upgrade despite not meeting the requirements by GOR098
SOME power users complain a lot.
Caasi6636 t1_j9zayuf wrote
I’m almost certain though that 95% of domestic robot repairs cannot be done by the owner, making it much less feasible.
Ok-Welder-4816 t1_j9zap2y wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Even Hackers are reportedly getting Laid Off by Organized Crime Groups by TradingAllIn
Realistically, though, it doesn't prevent anything.
The odds of them finding out are very low, and bringing a succesful suit even lower (especially with a 10 year NDA over a school project -- it would be easy to get that thrown out as unreasonable).
They're basically just relying on the fact that most people are good people and will largely follow the rules. It's amazing how much of society depends on that assumption, really.
Deranged40 t1_j9z9wwc wrote
Reply to comment by Specific-Salad3888 in Signal would 'walk' from UK if Online Safety Bill undermined encryption by HeroldMcHerold
So, just because you can't think of a reason why I need encryption means I don't need it?
I can tell you one thing, it will absolutely not stop terrorists bombing anything.
AwakenGreywolf t1_j9z9kai wrote
You mean to tell me AI chatbots are chatting!? IT'S OVER SKYNET IS HERE! /s
Daimakku1 t1_j9z90ha wrote
Reply to Windows 10 users are being offered a Windows 11 upgrade despite not meeting the requirements by GOR098
Yeah I'm not enabling TPM so f*ck off Microsoft.
Juliuseizure t1_j9z8paj wrote
They are designed to simulate human response. They are TRAINED on human responses. They are as much off the rails as their source of training.
xtrapas t1_j9z7yxx wrote
Reply to comment by Lord_Blizzard in US says Google routinely destroyed evidence and lied about use of auto-delete by OutlandishnessOk2452
youngling lol
​
i was thinking my old vhs tape.. the one with the thin section. the scene i loved most, so repeated use... poor tape
​
VHS dude, VHS
​
​
cds...pff
Exshot32 t1_j9z7ysi wrote
Reply to comment by HolyAndOblivious in Windows 10 users are being offered a Windows 11 upgrade despite not meeting the requirements by GOR098
The Pro market and office subscriptions (and selling user data) far out way the losses of losing a few consumer class customers.
Smith6612 t1_j9z7y5s wrote
Reply to comment by epic_null in Windows 10 users are being offered a Windows 11 upgrade despite not meeting the requirements by GOR098
They should definitely prompt for it like Apple does/did on macOS. It can help consumers too, since computers do get stolen from homes all the time.
The_Bridge_Imperium t1_j9z7whg wrote
Skynet, T 1000, hark!
Exshot32 t1_j9z7squ wrote
Reply to comment by epic_null in Windows 10 users are being offered a Windows 11 upgrade despite not meeting the requirements by GOR098
I work in a repair store.
NO customer ever knows their drive is Bitlocker or Filevault encrypted. NONE.
I'm on board with encryption for consumer protection, but Microsoft and Apple do a horrid job of explaining what they are doing to your data. They want you using their cloud services. So encrypting your drive with auto cloud backup becomes kinda a sneaky maneuver.
If they just explained things better I'd be fully on board with this. But no one understands why I can't get their data from a dead machine with an encrypted drive. And good luck remembering your Microsoft or iCloud password and finding your recovery keys.
The_Bridge_Imperium t1_j9z7ri1 wrote
Sensationalist headlines and articles written by posters
Smith6612 t1_j9z7rfy wrote
Reply to comment by Western-Image7125 in Google asks workers to share desks amid mass layoffs by ravik_reddit_007
Haha, yeah I completely forgot about the housing values. I was looking at real estate in the Bay Area a few years ago when colleagues were trying to get me to move out there. I immediately noped out, and said those prices need to have a massive crash and come back to Earth before I consider something like that.
Mccobsta t1_j9z6htg wrote
Gov will be fucked as they use this
LiberalFartsMajor t1_j9z615a wrote
AI chatbot are designed to scare workers into submission. It's anti-union propaganda with accompanying software.
altrdgenetics t1_j9z5rt1 wrote
Reply to comment by glacialthinker in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
But heaven forbid we do anything about guns getting into schools or superintendents leaving theirs on the shiiter in the bathrooms... Ya know, for the children.
Edsgnat t1_j9z5ns4 wrote
Reply to comment by NextFaithlessness7 in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
They can read every letter, and governments have a long history of doing exactly that. Most states (in the broad sense, not the US sense) control postal systems. And while private delivery in some form has also existed, almost all states have the ability to seize private property.
All postal services have access to your private communications because they have physical control over it. Letters and packages cannot be encrypted to the same level of sophistication that electronic communication can, meaning they’re almost always understandable by the receiver. Any deliverer of mail, at any time, can open a random letter, read it, and understand it. Any government can seize that letter and do the same. Unfettered access to private communication.
Looking for a specific letter — or specific content in a group of letters — is a question of incentive, resources, and law. For centuries (and let’s be real, millennia) states have had incentives to control messaging through censorship, seize contraband, investigate criminal activity, change private votes, you name it. Almost all states have the resources to pay large amounts people to deliver — or intercept the delivery of — mail, and to sift through mail, read it, and censor it or what have you. In the last few hundred years, a large number of states have prohibited themselves from doing this indiscriminately, while still reserving the ability to do so. Other states have no constitutions and can do so indiscriminately.
Electronic communication of some kind or other has frustrated the states ability to intercept private communication. So far states have had the resources to develop technologies in response, like wiretapping for instance.
Encrypted messaging used to be a thing states did to keep secrets from each other, but now the state’s citizens can do the same on a scale unprecedented in human history. Until recently, states had the resources and time to break encrypted communication. Now technology has advanced to the point where they have neither. Thus states have incentives to intercept private communication between citizens (see above) but no ability to.
Hence, they want a back door.
Sea_Guava6513 t1_j9z5mzs wrote
*the jokes write themselves
daniel_bran t1_j9z5mh2 wrote
Reply to comment by CleanThroughMyJorts in Google making ‘terrible mistake’ in blocking Canadian news: Trudeau by Defiant_Race_7544
Google = parasite Looks like they have enough useful idiots or shills to do damage control when they get criticized online
Lord_Blizzard t1_j9z5lzn wrote
Reply to comment by xtrapas in US says Google routinely destroyed evidence and lied about use of auto-delete by OutlandishnessOk2452
Shouldn't have destroyed thoses CDs!
Mental-Aioli3372 t1_j9zcjk0 wrote
Reply to comment by theannotator in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
>taking actions
do you think you could be a little more vague
>You can disagree with an opinion but the platform shouldn’t be banning things that aren’t illegal and still get 230.
Why not