Recent comments in /f/technology
Ok-Welder-4816 t1_j9wcxzl wrote
Reply to comment by This_Recording8424 in Even Hackers are reportedly getting Laid Off by Organized Crime Groups by TradingAllIn
"uhhh nothing I can tell you about"
Individual-Result777 t1_j9wcwzj wrote
Reply to comment by HeroldMcHerold in TikTok at Risk: Canada starts investigating platform over data collection from young users by HeroldMcHerold
First impressions are important.
[deleted] t1_j9wcge7 wrote
[deleted]
TheHumbleGeek t1_j9wcfyw wrote
The canadian journalists? ALL of them, or just the ones the Canadian government approves of? Besides, why does he care... CBC isn't going anywhere with how much money his government has funneled into it...
daj0412 t1_j9wc7s1 wrote
why does this actually make me laugh lol like we’re all really just living the same lives..
Onicc t1_j9wc30z wrote
UBI when? if you think the homeless crisis is bad now, boy.. just you wait!
VaritasV t1_j9wbpk0 wrote
Reply to DeepMind created an AI system that writes computer programs at a competitive level by inaLilah
In the future, there will be AI communicating with other AI to research and teach us to build everything that it discovers.
basil_not_the_plant t1_j9wbn2g wrote
Reply to US says Google routinely destroyed evidence and lied about use of auto-delete by OutlandishnessOk2452
Google's corporate motto: "Do evil"
soIstartBlasting t1_j9wbjtj wrote
Are those really the people you want to anger by firing them?
axionic t1_j9wbh11 wrote
Reply to comment by FixLegitimate2672 in Fourth Circuit: Individuals Have a First Amendment Right to Livestream Their Own Traffic Stops by mepper
What a great Kickstarter idea
BroForceOne t1_j9wb7lb wrote
>“It really surprises me that Google has decided that they’d rather prevent Canadians from accessing news than actually paying journalists for the work they do,”
No, I don't think that surprised anyone.
peepeedog t1_j9waim0 wrote
Reply to comment by Strong-Estate-4013 in Microsoft Bing AI ends chat when prompted about 'feelings' by Ssider69
Facebook research just open sources their LLMs this week.
HanaBothWays t1_j9wabvo wrote
Reply to comment by dopef123 in Even Hackers are reportedly getting Laid Off by Organized Crime Groups by TradingAllIn
There are two possibilities for this:
One, hook up to a module or service that will inject the malware for you (these absolutely exist).
Two, there are lots of well-known vulnerabilities out there that a lot of people haven’t patched…and ChatGPT may know what they are!
You could prompt it with “write malware like this with a delivery mechanism that uses the top five known exploitable vulnerabilities” (yes there is a list).
qubedView t1_j9w9fx0 wrote
Reply to comment by whole__sense in Google asks workers to share desks amid mass layoffs by ravik_reddit_007
Ahh, I see. We’re at that “bleed talent from the company for short term stock gain and bail from this hot potato before it’s obvious we’re tanking” step.
There was a point in history where what was good for a company’s stock was good for the company in general. But now successful companies are shooting themselves in the foot with alarming frequency. If the stock isn’t going up, then the shareholders get angry. Doesn’t matter that the market is saturated and there is nowhere “up” left to go. The company won’t be complacent with steady massive profits and instead commit suicide just to get that last stock bump.
HanaBothWays t1_j9w97n0 wrote
Reply to comment by SujetoSujetado in Even Hackers are reportedly getting Laid Off by Organized Crime Groups by TradingAllIn
Okay. People on forums frequented by script kiddie types have been saying they can get good stuff out of ChatGPT, but of course script kiddies would not know the difference.
The people who write the tools used by script kiddies or those “ransomware as a service” type kits are a different story…
dopef123 t1_j9w906f wrote
Reply to comment by HanaBothWays in Even Hackers are reportedly getting Laid Off by Organized Crime Groups by TradingAllIn
Really? Ive never worked on malware but doesn't it typically need some pretty slick ways to inject code?
bookersbooks t1_j9w8y1z wrote
Reply to comment by buttpincher in Ericsson to lay off 8,500 employees by mitousa
I like how people from other countries will default to saying, “in my country” or “in ______.” But Americans are in THE country.
SujetoSujetado t1_j9w8ncw wrote
Reply to comment by HanaBothWays in Even Hackers are reportedly getting Laid Off by Organized Crime Groups by TradingAllIn
I am a malware developer, this is not true as a general rule, malware code outputted by these language models have been subpar even for script kiddies standards (most code doesn't even work or don't do what it needs to do). Demonstration:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9w_k2ypRr0
[deleted] t1_j9w82yn wrote
Reply to comment by RandomPeasant1236 in Almost 40% of domestic tasks could be done by robots ‘within decade’ by altmorty
[removed]
fat_tony7 t1_j9w7t0l wrote
I can do most domestic tasks in just a few minutes!
hocumflute t1_j9w7cv2 wrote
Reply to comment by JMacNCheese91 in US says Google routinely destroyed evidence and lied about use of auto-delete by OutlandishnessOk2452
I'm so glad the cut off is 20 years :)
vriska1 t1_j9w6z4p wrote
Reply to comment by beef-o-lipso in Signal would 'walk' from UK if Online Safety Bill undermined encryption by HeroldMcHerold
Thing the bill is a unworkable mess that it is likely to collapse under its own weight just look at the last UK age verification law that was delayed over and over again until it was quietly scraped.
400921FB54442D18 t1_j9w6xm9 wrote
Reply to US says Google routinely destroyed evidence and lied about use of auto-delete by OutlandishnessOk2452
And what is "US" planning to do about it that stands any meaningful chance of changing Google's behavior?
RandomPeasant1236 t1_j9w6xi4 wrote
Reply to comment by Agnia_Barto in Almost 40% of domestic tasks could be done by robots ‘within decade’ by altmorty
So uncivilized
fastornator t1_j9wd3q0 wrote
Reply to US says Google routinely destroyed evidence and lied about use of auto-delete by OutlandishnessOk2452
I don't get it. Is there some legal requirement that instant messages be retained for some amount of time?
I mean I get it If chat messages that were under discovery got deleted, but I don't think that's the case. It's just that at some point in time new chat conversations were set to be deleted in 24 hours. A new chat conversation can't possibly be relevant to a previous order of discovery.