Recent comments in /f/technology

fastornator t1_j9wd3q0 wrote

I don't get it. Is there some legal requirement that instant messages be retained for some amount of time?

I mean I get it If chat messages that were under discovery got deleted, but I don't think that's the case. It's just that at some point in time new chat conversations were set to be deleted in 24 hours. A new chat conversation can't possibly be relevant to a previous order of discovery.

5

HanaBothWays t1_j9wabvo wrote

There are two possibilities for this:

One, hook up to a module or service that will inject the malware for you (these absolutely exist).

Two, there are lots of well-known vulnerabilities out there that a lot of people haven’t patched…and ChatGPT may know what they are!

You could prompt it with “write malware like this with a delivery mechanism that uses the top five known exploitable vulnerabilities” (yes there is a list).

1

qubedView t1_j9w9fx0 wrote

Ahh, I see. We’re at that “bleed talent from the company for short term stock gain and bail from this hot potato before it’s obvious we’re tanking” step.

There was a point in history where what was good for a company’s stock was good for the company in general. But now successful companies are shooting themselves in the foot with alarming frequency. If the stock isn’t going up, then the shareholders get angry. Doesn’t matter that the market is saturated and there is nowhere “up” left to go. The company won’t be complacent with steady massive profits and instead commit suicide just to get that last stock bump.

33

HanaBothWays t1_j9w97n0 wrote

Okay. People on forums frequented by script kiddie types have been saying they can get good stuff out of ChatGPT, but of course script kiddies would not know the difference.

The people who write the tools used by script kiddies or those “ransomware as a service” type kits are a different story…

10