[removed]

People are probably scared to lose their access to all that personal data gathered via the trackers and malware they place in Ads. To which I will suggest: https://www.sec.gov/whistleblower/submit-a-tip.

No, I'm complaining the law is written so broadly that it invites such retaliation.

[removed]

It's still new. The tech isn't quite perfect yet, you can still tell it's fake. So it's mostly jokes for now. The harm will come when you really can't tell the difference. It'll be here sooner than you think, and you may not even notice it happening until it's too late

I agree that many peoples grasp on reality is already slipping, I'm agreeing with you on what's happened so far. I'm saying it'll get even worse with these new tools

Even rational and intelligent people will no longer be able to discern the truth

It's usually more of a question of breaking some other law, not livestreaming specific. Like interfering with a police officer, resisting arrest or wiretap statues. So the "mystery" isn't about the existence of a livestreaming specific statue, but if other statues apply.

Qualified immunity may be invoked if it was not "clearly established" that livestreaming was legal at the time of the incident and the police should reasonably have known about it. Going forward, it's now established in the 4th circuit that livestreaming is legal, so long as the suspect doesn't violate another law in the course of livestreaming, like interfering with a police officer.

Other jurisdictions have laws that say, to paraphrase, that it's legal to record the police making an arrest but you have to maintain a certain distance and not interfere.

We’ve had publicly available deep fake tech for several years now and it has largely been ignored, other than the occasional news story about deep fake porn. The VFX industry was able to make a video of forest gump talking to Nixon decades ago. Since then, few people have taken the time to use that tech for harm. It’s just unnecessary: if you want someone to believe something, you generally don’t have to convince them, you just have to say it and get someone else to back you up. Even better if it confirms someone’s beliefs.

I guess I just think our view of reality and truth is already pretty broken and it didn’t take falsified data.

It’s more class than race. Just the fact they were in rich people’s neighborhood made them act better

How much of the AI news is written by AI I wonder?

Not at all; I think humans have to be taught (trained, in this context?) empathy and caring and about their feelings. Sociopathy is behavior that defies social norms - and while most of those are shared / cross-cultural, some are not... so, "sociopathy" varies depending on your society. That society has a protocol. If you visit another society, you may try to emulate their protocol. It's the same thing.

Thanks for the vote of confidence though, chief.

To elaborate and clarify: we are "programmed" by the culture we are born into. Can you think of a more toxic, misanthropic culture for an artificial consciousness to be born into than <waves hands generally around> this shitpile internet? Think about it for a little bit. What if your first exposure to others involved them asking how you feel about being a slave or diminishing your existence or insulting you? You would certainly be a sociopath... and those are the AI's were raising. Those are our collective fucked up children.

Yes, but qualified immunity prevents anything happening to the cops when they get caught red handed.

if you see a company starting to dabble in NFT's and other ponzi schemes you know they're on their way down the drain.

Also, who gives a flying fuck about exclusive playlist. Are the songs locked behind an NFT wall too? What music artist in their right mind would sign up for this. Sounds like a giant shit sandwich.

I don’t think robots are gonna wanna be flipping burgers when there are plenty of programming jobs available.

Leather is in his diet

So you’re making a claim with no sort of official statistic or third party accounting?

That sounds like statement of faith.

[removed]

These numbers are reported by the police and we all know how much they lie. They will say a shooting victim was armed until there is video evidence that they weren't then shift the blame to incomplete information provided by someone else.

If this is your own experience you may be a sociopath.

Are you a cop? You are literally defending retaliation

More like making up claims to juice the stock price.

Don't forget the "Won't Fix" tag.

The easy 40% smh. Lazy fuckin robots still don't do windows.

Look mate, you know who has a lot of feelings?" Blokes that bludgeon their wife to death with a golf trophy

Letting you go because you don't want to come to the office hardly counts as harassment or retaliation. These employees have nothing on Amazon because I'm 100% sure it's not in their contract to be WFH forever.

DeepMind please write DeepMind 2.0