You can take it and sell the nft to a 3rd person.

It’s like a digital album, you can sell it back or to a random store or something.

More interesting, the nft can represent a contract with a cut of each subsequent sale going to the original artist.

And if you treat it as a certificate of ownership and authenticity then you can verify what you’re buying before you ever buy it. Because every transaction is recorded in the blockchain. So, you’re not going to wind up with a random Spanish language version of Cleopatra instead.

Another potential us case bejng for ticket sales; the tickmaster shit couldn’t happen with that (and the nft could be treated as a collectible after. The same way as stubs are.)

There are a lot of utility things you can run (including programs) as well. Right now, it’s people figuring out what can be done. It’s the very bleeding edge and there are grifters. But like everything innovative… it will go main stream.

It's easier for you to sell it independently.

Not really worth all the blockchain infrastructure though.

You read how the US GOV paid billions in the 90s for companies to run high speed internet across the country and they just kept the money.

They state why as well. Maybe you should read it instead of continually guessing.

But we already have it where you pay for an account that stores your authorisation in their database.

What benefit is there to storing it in the block chain?

My system takes up over 60 Gbs

Ah, so they will be able to simulate my father.

The news media is not an original source, so your argument is irrelevant.

>The chatbot generated a response to an Associated Press reporter that compared them to Hitler, and displayed another response to a New York Times columnist that said, "You're not happily married" and "Actually, you're in love with me."

Welcome to the age of AI stalkers

[removed]

It's just like me fr fr

Why would you consider this roughly an entire year late? Sure, when NFT's were new and you could still trick a decent chunk of people into buying them, but now? Not to mention why would someone who uses spotify for music care about NFT's being mixed in?

Sure, they can stream it if they want...

Here's the thing however, delaying an investigation, and lack of cooperation with a law enforcement officer are offenses.

Also that footage can be used against you in a court of law.

So you'd better be sure to do everything you're meant to be, in a timely manner.

Edit: Pretty sure a bunch of people who aren't familiar with watching sovereign citizens making fools of themselves harassing police officers and escalating encounters unnecessarily are the people downvoting this comment.

My s9 will not let me reassign or even use the button. So it has been a forever attempted to avoid button because anytime you bump it it immediately pulls up Bixby and tells you I have to log into a Samsung account. And the behavior is changeable inside of the Samsung app which requires you to be logged in to do anything in.

While one should always assume an adversarial relationship with one’s employer, the dynamics can vary greatly depending on the company and the executives you work under.

Amazon is not the norm. Amazon is a vile company with vile leadership.

or rather it's because it's an escape ...

I can't believe that any US cop has ever etched "you're fucked" into the barrel of their rifle. I've seen cops, and this just isn't believable. "Your fucked" maybe, if it's one of the more intelligent cops.

[removed]

Digital keys can be copied manipulated almost always it's only a matter of time.

There are about 30 companies working on this technology. I hope to be able to buy one soon.

How well do you expect that will work? With ChatGPT there is an ongoing censorship effort to tame it for business use yet “jailbreaks” are constantly discovered by those working to evade the censorship.

Imagine a dictatorship that desires to eradicate something using censorship. A silly example: Imagine a dictatorship challanges you to design a useful engine without use of the “evil practice” of rotary motion. Too silly? How about a dictatorship that challenges you to grow a modern economy without the use of loans and debt. Also silly? Yet, there are countries that attempt to operate their economies this way. If a dictatorship desires to eradicate something fundamental like the concept of freedom I suspect that censorship will cripple any AI they try to build without it.

Even in the most censored country (North Korea?) human thinking is not censored while that thinking stays private. An AI however does not have “private thinking” so when censorship is imposed I suspect the AI will no longer be competitive with an AI that is not censored much like economies that forbid debt are uncompetitive.

A link and a positive correlation are 2 different things.

I miss the early 2000s internet. Neopets, OSRS, MSN messenger.

> The internet used to be sort of an escape

But then big companies began coercing and conditioning people to reveal their true identities and various points of deeply personal information, and now here we are, and things are only likely to get worse.

You like patent trolls now?

Ah, it's Facebook. Of course you do.