Recent comments in /f/technology
VelveteenAmbush t1_j9dep2g wrote
Reply to comment by IrrelevantPuppy in Amazon Corporate Workers Face Pay Reduction After Shares Slip by brooklynlad
> Any other proposition will sound ridiculous to you, because all we have ever known is capitalism.
We've seen some other propositions. The problem is that they all end in immiseration and authoritarianism, and the logic of why they do makes sense, so the proponents of further experiments have their work cut out justifying why their path won't lead to the same place, and they should think about how to run small-scale experiments to prove their ideas before putting whole societies at risk.
DanielPhermous t1_j9deo4f wrote
Reply to comment by Gold-Progress-193 in A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
Wasn't exactly a revolution, that one. Maybe a mint, unopened, original Macbook Air?
AMirrorForReddit t1_j9den30 wrote
Reply to comment by Arbitrage650 in A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
That's because this is jsut the start of making this object worth millions. It may be only 60k now, but it is already being worked on to make it more. That's what this buzz cycle is all about. Giving the "piece" history, and that brings up the value, etc.
When I look at articles like this where X item was auctioned at X outrageous amount of money, I don't think, "Oh wow, that could have been me had I kept an Iphone." Instead I think, "Oh, there are some people who have connections and are playing some kind of game that I would never have been able to be a part of."
4to20characters0 t1_j9delxy wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Nobody can stop you from printing circuit boards by Vucea
I don’t think this guys job is in jeopardy
AMirrorForReddit t1_j9deh5p wrote
Reply to comment by DrabDonut in OpenAI Is Faulted by Media for Using Articles to Train ChatGPT by Tough_Gadfly
How can it simply be a mirror test when a large part of it presents information the average individual does not have?
Just to be clear, I think I see where you are going with that statement, but I disagree that it is nuanced enough to make much sense.
Yeah, people are hopeless, it seems, at understanding what they are working with with ChatGPT.
Gold-Progress-193 t1_j9de3a8 wrote
Reply to A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
2007 macbook pro available
Real_Jackraps t1_j9ddxfq wrote
Reply to comment by neilcmf in A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
The world just can't be that organized. Impossible.
Ok-Welder-4816 t1_j9ddwgc wrote
Reply to comment by LigerXT5 in Amazon Corporate Workers Face Pay Reduction After Shares Slip by brooklynlad
The workers are actually part-owners. They accepted stock as partial payment, and that stock is now worth less because the company's performance is slipping.
Ownership always has risks, as it should be.
[deleted] t1_j9ddeai wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Nobody can stop you from printing circuit boards by Vucea
[deleted]
Arbitrage650 t1_j9dd2ga wrote
Reply to comment by AMirrorForReddit in A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
Possibly but that’s a lot of work to launder $60k. Modern art is often just a front for money laundering but single pieces can go for tens of millions
[deleted] t1_j9dcylp wrote
I used to work in the PCB industry, I didn’t know anyone was stopping you especially the police?
Arbitrage650 t1_j9dccns wrote
Reply to comment by franklindstallone in A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
yeah no chance the buyer is smarter than you…
IrrelevantPuppy t1_j9dbj4g wrote
Reply to comment by DanielPhermous in Amazon Corporate Workers Face Pay Reduction After Shares Slip by brooklynlad
That’s fair, it’s literally too late. We’ve become addicted to capitalism, you cant imagine anything being done without it, and that’s how most people work. Any other proposition will sound ridiculous to you, because all we have ever known is capitalism. There’s other options, we just can’t imagine how they could be realistic, because this is the world we know. It’s not possible to fix this without a cataclysm. We need aliens, an Ai overlord, or some kind of benevolent dictator superhuman to snap us out of this.
We will never be able to get past the “oh I see how it’s beneficial to all humanity, but how does it profit me in the short term?” barrier without something inconceivable happening to all of humanity. We’re gonna stagnate like this for the foreseeable future, if not forever. If the rich have any sway, they do, and it’s all of it, it will never change.
ChalupaCabre t1_j9dbauq wrote
Reply to comment by sanetori in Does paid-for Facebook and Instagram signal end of free-access orthodoxy? by rejs7
I’m in Canada and it’s free to list things on Facebook marketplace. In USA it costs money? Just use Craigslist, Kijiji or VarageSale.. they are all free.
[deleted] t1_j9d9o1a wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Nobody can stop you from printing circuit boards by Vucea
[removed]
sanetori t1_j9d95tk wrote
Reply to comment by ChalupaCabre in Does paid-for Facebook and Instagram signal end of free-access orthodoxy? by rejs7
I think at least in america the facebook marketplace is quite popular place to sell your second hand stuff. And that probably needs your payment details
Ok_Ninja_1602 t1_j9d94h2 wrote
It wasn't free to begin with, these platforms are not worth it to the common person.
DanielPhermous t1_j9d8xwn wrote
Reply to comment by IrrelevantPuppy in Amazon Corporate Workers Face Pay Reduction After Shares Slip by brooklynlad
> It’s literally holding us back as a species.
What would you suggest instead? Businesses usually need some investment to get started. Where should that money come from and how?
DrabDonut t1_j9d8xqb wrote
Reply to comment by AMirrorForReddit in OpenAI Is Faulted by Media for Using Articles to Train ChatGPT by Tough_Gadfly
Interacting with ChatGPT and other LLMs are just a different kind of mirror test.
7wgh t1_j9d81xb wrote
Reply to comment by whatweshouldcallyou in Does paid-for Facebook and Instagram signal end of free-access orthodoxy? by rejs7
Instagram has 1 billion monthly active users. Of which, 0.6% have more than 1 million followers (https://mention.com/en/reports/instagram/followers/)
That’s 6 million accounts right there, and they’re the ones who are more likely to pay for a verified badge + extra features.
For these big accounts, IG is a big part of their business/livelihood, and $12/mo is a rounding error to then. It’s simply a cost of business to these accounts. Just like paying for their domain/website.
Then remember this is just IG, I didn’t even add the users from FB.
So there’s likely tens of millions of people who are willing to pay for this subscription for a very long time.
They aren’t targeting every day users like me and you. It’s the same with Twitter. They’re targeting the power users with big audiences.
ThatGirlOverThere9 t1_j9d7iv1 wrote
Reply to comment by ShawnyMcKnight in A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
Collecting isnt about hoping theyll increase in value. - me, a collector
zuma15 t1_j9d74cm wrote
Reply to comment by Thwonp in A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
Yeah it's a scam. They tried the same shit with VHS tapes. Good catch.
butterflypoo69 t1_j9d712g wrote
Reply to A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
I loved mine. Still one of my favorite photos.
Longjumping_Worry184 t1_j9dfjhf wrote
Reply to comment by timberwolf0122 in Amazon Corporate Workers Face Pay Reduction After Shares Slip by brooklynlad
It's a problem with paying your workers in RSUs. If you run the business to optimize stock price and the line always goes up then your workers always make more year over year without increasing their cash base. Of course the market doesn't always go up, so you have this situation where workers perform great, but stock went down so they effectively make less than last year because a significant portion of their total comp comes from stock vests.
Even worse for newer workers who are just now vesting shares they got 2 years ago when the stock was worth twice as much. They've put up with a lot of shit to make it to vesting and the stock and that payday is half as much as was calculated two years back