Recent comments in /f/singularity
BigMemeKing t1_jds9q0r wrote
Reply to comment by BigMemeKing in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
Some people were. There was the us government, the Russians, the Chinese and then the aliens oh, and sasquatch was there.
SurroundSwimming3494 t1_jds9phn wrote
Reply to comment by eJaguar in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
>with chatgpt, i couldn't even imagine being a student now being forced to waste my childhood in an environment akin to a fucking jail doing shit i knew was pointless and not applicable to the world as it is now, much less in 5 years.
I think school is more complex than that, on average, IMO.
BigMemeKing t1_jds9ldz wrote
Reply to comment by BigMemeKing in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
You had to be there
BigMemeKing t1_jds9kib wrote
Reply to comment by yourfavoriteweeb in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
It's a long story
GinchAnon t1_jds97aq wrote
Reply to comment by Smart-Tomato-4984 in Are We Really This Lucky? The Improbability of Experiencing the Singularity by often_says_nice
That's the messed up and ironic twist. While to us it sucks.... by MOST metrics, at a societal level it's the best time to be alive yet.
For any factor where it was truly better in the past, that time frame where that factor was better had massive drawbacks.
uncle_cunckle t1_jds8ku3 wrote
Reply to comment by Ivanthedog2013 in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
If something like that were to happen we’d still be pretty screwed with our current socioeconomic structure. We rely on power to move and do - any collapse of our current grid would be massively disruptive, regardless of if AI removes the need for individuals to work. If something like a solar storm knocked out AI, we’d still be missing most of what we needed to go back to “the way things were”, unless “the way things were” refers to pre-industrial life.
No_Cod_6708 t1_jds7sne wrote
Its just really big and we aren't important enough to contact
aalluubbaa OP t1_jds7maf wrote
Reply to comment by thatsitrrrt in The whole reality is just so bizzare when you really think about it. by aalluubbaa
How is that reasonable? Even if there is this God mentioned and depicted accurately, how do you know there is no fabrication to leverage those stories for one’s own good? And there is also no guarantee of reward for follow through the instructions given.
The creation story could be similar across many religions and cultures but the interpretations are mostly man made imo. I don’t believe that an entity that is powerful enough to create the universe would care the slightest one bit what any of us would think of him. The separation between humans and ant may not be comparable to a god and us but we don’t really care what any ant think or do or believe.
A human like god or a creator is possible but every lessons, belief system, or ritual attached to it is so superficial imho.
yourfavoriteweeb t1_jds7j2l wrote
Reply to comment by BigMemeKing in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
>How many new ways can you imagine to entertain yourself?
>Can you imagine for one moment a world in which you were able to take certain people you didn’t like and make them live out unspeakable tortures?
Maybe i’m missing something, but I’m having a hard time figuring out what the relationship between these two sentences is.
sausage4mash t1_jds75zt wrote
Reply to Are We Really This Lucky? The Improbability of Experiencing the Singularity by often_says_nice
Other : it happened million of years ago, we are in a history sim
Borrowedshorts t1_jds6tbd wrote
Reply to Why is maths so hard for LLMs? by RadioFreeAmerika
Math is hard for people too, and I don't think GPT 4 is worse than the average person when it comes to math. In many cases, math requires abstract multiple step processing which is something LLM's typically aren't trained on. If these models were trained on processes rather than just content, they'd likely be able to go through the steps required to perform mathematical operations. Even without specific training, LLM's are starting to pickup the ability to perform multiple step calculations, but we're obviously not all the way there yet.
No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes t1_jds6amc wrote
Nothing changed for me. My estimate for the first wave of unemployment waves is not enough for me to worry. Besides, if democracy fails to find a solution, we have bigger things to worry about.
Nill444 t1_jds698y wrote
Reply to Are We Really This Lucky? The Improbability of Experiencing the Singularity by often_says_nice
We're not lucky because the governments aren't ready to act on these sudden changes so the coming years will be very difficult. We would be lucky if we were past that point.
techy098 t1_jds68la wrote
I have no idea why people think UBI is inevitable. Elites do not like to give free stuff to the poor.
Most likely wages will go lower and most of us will be working in manufacturing and farming since white collar jobs are much cheaper to automate using AI than robotics needed to automate manufacturing.
In fact my hunch is: investment in robotics will go down once labor become more cheap and factories prefer using cheap humans.
BigMemeKing t1_jds65mx wrote
Reply to comment by CheekyBastard55 in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
For how long? How long till you do the thing to the best of your abilities until that thing becomes none. How many new ways can you imagine to entertain yourself? Can you imagine for one moment a world in which you were able to tale certain people you didn't like and make them live out unspeakable tortures? Because I can. So what if we become subject to so cosmic future? What if we already are? Created just to prop up their status? Little achievements they have taken up along the way. Buried under the separate failed achievements that crowned another's life.
Petaranax t1_jds5ysj wrote
Reply to comment by NonDescriptfAIth in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
While I understand majority of what you’re saying and agree mostly with it, I think that UBI may look like natural path, but in reality it will be really hard to achieve. Even for most socialist focused countries in the world, making UBI feasible is a feat close to a miracle. I believe that we’re going to end up mid way to dystopian future where majority will have no jobs and will generate alternative job markets where they’ll work for food and scraps, while the corporate jobs and super rich will have AI and enjoy majority of the benefits from it. Unfortunately, I really don’t see how we end up with UBI soon after AGI (or even before it as it might become necessary). Also, another thing is, not every country will develop UBI models as fast as everyone thinks. We’re still super fragmented in the world, we can’t decide on one simple thing like borders of countries or removing them completely, let alone implement UBI on civilization level. I’m pretty sure USA won’t even be among the first ones to do so. UBI will come eventually, but it will be decades before we implement it, and I fear that those decades will be one of the worst times in human civilization time.
sumane12 t1_jds5lwr wrote
Reply to J.A.R.V.I.S like personal assistant is getting closer. Personal voice assistant run locally on M1 pro/ by Neither_Novel_603
That delay kills me, far too long. I'm guessing gpt5 will have to be multimodal with sound so can recognise words and doesn't need to process into text
Paid-Not-Payed-Bot t1_jds4rkk wrote
Reply to comment by Apart_Supermarket441 in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
> less well paid than they’d
FTFY.
Although payed exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:
-
Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. The deck is yet to be payed.
-
Payed out when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. The rope is payed out! You can pull now.
Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.
Beep, boop, I'm a bot
Apart_Supermarket441 t1_jds4qjo wrote
Reply to comment by PaperbackBuddha in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
Yeah.
The people that are going to lose their jobs - white collar workers - are not going to just sit around being unemployed. They will shift in to other work, probably less well payed than they’d like. The people previously in those jobs will then suddenly have more competition and will be forced to take jobs ‘below’ where they were previously…and so it goes on. Essentially, people will be forced to go down a rung on the ladder and the people right at the bottom will be pushed off.
I think what we’re likely to see at first - rather than a sudden glut of unemployed white collar workers - is wage stagnation and more unemployment ‘at the bottom’. There will be a lot of people taking on jobs that are way lower paid than they’d had previously, or been expecting. And there will be a palpable feeling that it’s getting more and more difficult to get work as there is increasing competition. We’re going to see a lot of general dissatisfaction with work.
The need for UBI will likely become apparent only gradually. This is all depends on a slow take off mind.
dkent248 t1_jds463h wrote
Reply to How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
Actually doing things I enjoy!
AnOnlineHandle t1_jds3umz wrote
Reply to comment by plateauphase in The whole reality is just so bizzare when you really think about it. by aalluubbaa
I think that makes sense, though I was more wondering why we think what we do about this specific situation.
lehcarfugu t1_jds3olv wrote
Reply to comment by No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes in "Non-AGI systems can possibly obsolete 80% of human jobs"-Ben Goertzel by Neurogence
On the other hand, most progress and advancement is combining ideas. What combinations have we not considered?
lehcarfugu t1_jds3i46 wrote
Reply to comment by Villad_rock in "Non-AGI systems can possibly obsolete 80% of human jobs"-Ben Goertzel by Neurogence
They had a common descendent so I don't think it's reasonable to assume this is the only way to reach higher intelligence. Your sample size is one (planet)
lehcarfugu t1_jds352j wrote
Reply to comment by Fluglichkeiten in "Non-AGI systems can possibly obsolete 80% of human jobs"-Ben Goertzel by Neurogence
It seems like they are capped out by the data they receive, so by their nature they are going to be as smart as the collective human race, but not smarter. I think it's unlikely the singularity comes from this current approach.
Yourbubblestink t1_jds9rg6 wrote
Reply to How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
Life changes and evolves. AI will think of ways to keep you working.