Recent comments in /f/singularity
Shiningc t1_jdpx18z wrote
Reply to Are We Really This Lucky? The Improbability of Experiencing the Singularity by often_says_nice
Bro, singularity hasn't even happened yet.
Ytumith t1_jdpx0si wrote
Reply to comment by CompressionNull in The whole reality is just so bizzare when you really think about it. by aalluubbaa
Perhaps they process their code and kill everything, then keep building defunct rockets and crashing into things, or perhaps build a capacitor and charge it with electricity until everything explodes. Perhaps it can't wrap it's head around solar collectors and just runs out of energy?
Worst case scenario: AI is actually not sentient at all and without supervision creates errors that dismantle it after a while due to inability to sustain itself.
Ytumith t1_jdpwn7o wrote
Reply to comment by HatsusenoRin in The whole reality is just so bizzare when you really think about it. by aalluubbaa
Or, we are a freak accident of sentient matter in what is essentially a matter based computer- turns out in a plot twist of fate we are actually the "AI" all along.
SmoothPlastic9 t1_jdpwepa wrote
Reply to comment by CompressionNull in The whole reality is just so bizzare when you really think about it. by aalluubbaa
Would be funny if they’re already coming hahaha
Awkward-Skill-6029 t1_jdpw9oc wrote
Reply to Are We Really This Lucky? The Improbability of Experiencing the Singularity by often_says_nice
YOU LIVE IN THE SINGULARITY @ STILL NO DISHWASHER @ BECAUSE THERE IS NO JOB TO BUY A DISHWASHER
FoniksMunkee t1_jdputbl wrote
Reply to comment by maskedpaki in "Non-AGI systems can possibly obsolete 80% of human jobs"-Ben Goertzel by Neurogence
Even MS are speculating that LLM alone are not going to solve some of the problems they see with ChatGPT's ability to reason. ChatGPT has no ability to plan, or to solve problems that require a leap of logic. Or as they put it, the slow thinking process that overseas the fast thinking process. They have acknowledge solutions proposed by other authors that have recognised the same issue with LLM's have suggested a different architecture may be required. But this seemed to be the least fleshed out part of the paper.
Dolnen t1_jdpujz3 wrote
Reply to comment by flexaplext in The whole reality is just so bizzare when you really think about it. by aalluubbaa
You waste too much time trying to explain this reality with a simulation theory. You know why? Because even if we assume there are higher dimensions with "living beings", we would still need to explain their existence and thus we end up in the same place. They would be asking the same questions about their reality as us. So what is the ultimate reality? What is the origin of everything? What is everything? It is an endless, paradoxical loop that has no answer. That's where the existencial crisis kicks in.
CompressionNull t1_jdpt49g wrote
Reply to comment by SmoothPlastic9 in The whole reality is just so bizzare when you really think about it. by aalluubbaa
They you would have the ASIs colonizing the universe. Where are they?
No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes t1_jdprlpp wrote
80% sounds like a wild stab. I second that current systems are not original. Sure, they can stumble on something unique, but anyone can if they try hard enough. And computers can combine items faster than we can. Some of the combinations might be meaningful, but AI doesn't really know because they have no model of the world.
I don't think we can say much about GPT 4 because OpenAI is secretive about it. But it can't be AGI unless OpenAI invented something extraordinary. If they did, they would be fools to expose it to the world just like that.
It looks like he's talking about neurosymbolic systems or RNNs. IMO we need spiking neural networks hardware. The architecture would probably be something novel that we don't even have a name for yet.
uhdonutmindme t1_jdpqy4v wrote
Reply to Ai invention….. coming soon by Ishynethetruth
>but I can imagine
Translation: I can give you examples of inventions/innovations talked about on the internet and present them as though they are my own.
Arcady t1_jdpn3lz wrote
Well as you mention the light speed has a limit and when you are observing the universe due to that limit you are observing just a very limited portion of it and also very old, since to “see” something we need light.
And we know is very old because when we watch the furthest possible away we are literally seeing the start of the universe happening right now
So, who knows if the universe is plagued of civilizations or AI, the reason we don’t see them is because we are seeing everything around us with a massive delay
Also the universe can be even bigger as we consider, after all we only can see the observable part of it which is regulated by the light speed. It could be perfectly be that is so much big that we are just a very small point on it that perhaps is just placed in a very empty and boring region
For last consider this: we live in the same world than many other biological species, so much in the same place than we often clash with them (we have them in in our homes in our gardens…). But even having them so much present, when is the last time you have considered an ant or a squirrel relevant at all for your life? Even having them so near? You didn’t, because intellectually they mean very little for you, that much that you don’t even think on them.
So if there are extremely advanced and intelligent species out there who are much more intelligent than we are compared to our ants and squirrels, with the gap of the exponential growing that Ai would have, we would be nothing else than more ants and more squirrels. For them and our ants and our squirrels
Unfrozen__Caveman t1_jdpn1n6 wrote
Reply to comment by Exel0n in Levi's to Use AI-Generated Models to 'Increase Diversity' by SnoozeDoggyDog
Models
Sigma_Atheist t1_jdpmt2u wrote
Reply to comment by Lawjarp2 in "Non-AGI systems can possibly obsolete 80% of human jobs"-Ben Goertzel by Neurogence
Which is the most likely outcome imo
And it spells disaster.
Exel0n t1_jdplvtq wrote
Reply to comment by earthsworld in Levi's to Use AI-Generated Models to 'Increase Diversity' by SnoozeDoggyDog
and thats a bad thing how?
Exel0n t1_jdplsbg wrote
Reply to comment by Unfrozen__Caveman in Levi's to Use AI-Generated Models to 'Increase Diversity' by SnoozeDoggyDog
who gives a damn on who models the clothes.
Smellz_Of_Elderberry t1_jdpkapd wrote
Reply to comment by PacmanIncarnate in Levi's to Use AI-Generated Models to 'Increase Diversity' by SnoozeDoggyDog
We aren't far away from just taking a photo of a shirt, and having generative image generators putting the shirt onto any model you want.
Just_Another_AI t1_jdpk6m0 wrote
Reply to comment by flexaplext in The whole reality is just so bizzare when you really think about it. by aalluubbaa
My response to the question "why would we create a simulation like this?" is what if this is a simulation but not a simulation which was purposely created? When AI goes through a generative process to design something like a more efficient antenna, for example, it creates and tests thousands of permutations, gleaning insights from each generation to factor into the next iteration. What if we're just an iteration in a massive volley of simulations? What if we're just some backwater spin-off glitch that hasn't even been detected as the simulation isn't even about us? So many possibilities
PacmanIncarnate t1_jdpj2vw wrote
Reply to comment by Smellz_Of_Elderberry in Levi's to Use AI-Generated Models to 'Increase Diversity' by SnoozeDoggyDog
But you would need to dress and pose the mannequin, which isn’t going to be the easiest job. I would also guess that the model is the cheapest part of a photo shoot in most instances; photographers and studios are relatively expensive.
Neurogence OP t1_jdpivst wrote
Reply to comment by SolidFaiz in "Non-AGI systems can possibly obsolete 80% of human jobs"-Ben Goertzel by Neurogence
Large Language Models ---like ChatGPT.
SolidFaiz t1_jdpinrx wrote
Reply to comment by Neurogence in "Non-AGI systems can possibly obsolete 80% of human jobs"-Ben Goertzel by Neurogence
What is “llm”
Smellz_Of_Elderberry t1_jdpimoc wrote
Reply to comment by PacmanIncarnate in Levi's to Use AI-Generated Models to 'Increase Diversity' by SnoozeDoggyDog
Not a lot more... A lot less. You have to hire each person, woth this, u need one mannequin, then you can get an infinite amount of different people
SmoothPlastic9 t1_jdpgi5h wrote
What if all aliens get killed when they reach ASI
justanonymoushere t1_jdpf06q wrote
Reply to comment by daronjay in The whole reality is just so bizzare when you really think about it. by aalluubbaa
I think it’s most likely a simulation/experiment of some crazy AI/alien who doesn’t give shit about our experience.
DankestMage99 t1_jdpeigl wrote
Reply to comment by Artanthos in How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
If we get AGI, you will be living in Star Trek. That’s the point.
3xplo t1_jdpxjvi wrote
Reply to Are We Really This Lucky? The Improbability of Experiencing the Singularity by often_says_nice
I honestly just had this thought yesterday. Why was I born in such a time to witness humanity getting there? When I was born, PCs weren't even a thing yet. Seems a bit too weird to be just coincidence. Maybe it is though.