!RemindMe 1 year "AI progress has plateaud for the the next 3 or 4 years until another breakthrough happens, as has been the case for the last 20 years. Currently 1 year into the plateau when I see this message"

They will specifically not hire anyone.

They will include minorities in their AI generated images more frequently than they did with their real models.

Or anyone else.

You’re saying that an AGI exist, a artificial sentient being, and you’re saying that a corporation owns it? Interesting.

It can replace people by making workers more productive. Have two coders and one just got a tool that doubles their productivity? Now you only need one coder.

I feel like it's kind of even worse this way, though. Like you specifically will not hire minorities, so this is the only way to increase diversity.

i dont think he mentioned quantum superposition (ctrl f) though I am sure his quantum (entanglement?) fascination has some incorrect assumptions embedded into it just because it would be very hard to have correct assumptions without those assumptions being the precise mathematical formulation of the theory

Soon there would be onlyfans clone services like aifans etc, where ultrarealistic ai models to get subs n stuff 😄

As an American, I fully agree

No.

Thats not how quantum superposition works...

It is all insane when you consider all of these things.

I agree with you

Prepare for people to shoot you down for expressing your enthusiasm, though.

"Increase diversity" AKA "save money"

Right now? Not really. In the future? Will probably require a ton of data about person (If you want it to be at least somewhat close)

Multiple companies are working on general purpose humanoid robots right now including Tesla who have already demonstrated prototypes of the hardware.

Even if that was not the case, the combination of AGI, 3D printing, and nanotechnology means that in the near future products will go from concept to mass production in months or even weeks not years.

The people who own the AI corporations will be the new world government as they will hold all the power. (Assuming they can solve alignment)

This is not the way to go about increasing diversity. If they want to use AI to let customers see themselves in clothes that would be interesting, but this is just an excuse to not pay for actual diverse models. It is not difficult to do this.

I will be messaging you in 1 year on 2024-03-25 20:26:30 UTC to remind you of this link

CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

^(Parent commenter can ) ^(delete this message to hide from others.)

!RemindMe 1 year "Generalized android demonstration"

Somebody finally said it lol. I think it's easy to see everything with starry eyes if you don't know all that much about robotics or how AI architectures actually work. Companies like Boston dynamics have been trying to solve robotics in the real world for years. Trying to make a humanoid like creature that can move around in an environment is EXTREMELY hard. And that's just on the robotics end, not the AI end.

The best AI right now are text gen and image gen. This is largely because of the amount of training data available for them. Trying to train an agent to interact with environment to preform a skilled trade? That's such an inconceivably hard task. Think about how much time Tesla has tried to make a self driving car, which is honestly really simple compared to a trade. There are maps that tell you the location of every building and road in the world, and there are a set of rules that everyone has to follow. Even then, it still has problems like running lights, failing to see pedestrians in front of it, hell even just looking at the screen you can see it bugging out trying to figure out if it's looking at a truck, car, or a bike.

Now think of that in trade terms. How are we going to have an AI purchase the hardware needed, go to the house, ask the owner what the problem is and where it is, diagnose the problem, and then fix it, all without screwing up and flooding the whole house. These are orders of magnitude more difficult problems for AI to solve that writing an essay, writing code, or creating an image. And we don't even have a lick of training data.

And then for anybody who's like "oh well it was also inconceivable for text and image gen", well I mean maybe for most people, but I think a lot of people (including myself) saw huge potential in them since years ago. I also develop image, video, and language models so it's not like I'm clueless about AI either.

Lol......

Been watching too many American movies that convinced them that they’re special and the chosen ones.

This year? You guys are insane lol. Computer vision is absolutely trash compared to the state of language models. And no, feeding each frame into GPT 4 is not a good or viable option either.

Maybe a bit more work but a solid chunk less money. Plus the mannequin can model 24/7 365

Exactly, hence being easily replaced as low-hanging fruit for AI, early on. Its all the jobs 'on the margins' (aka marginalized people) that go first. Modeling work is def gig work, and those workers have no voice or ability to push against any wholesale replacement.