Recent comments in /f/singularity

BonzoTheBoss t1_jd7ic3g wrote

> The car recognizes that a crash is inevitable and it has 2 options. Option one leads to severe harm for the single driver of the car. And option 2 leads to severe harm of 2 bystanders.

And honestly, even if the "correct" answer is to allow one to die so that two may live, who will want to purchase a car that will sacrifice your life for strangers? I know that I wouldn't, even if I logically acknowledge that it may be the "right" decision, I still emotionally value my own life over those of strangers.

1

flamegrandma666 t1_jd7hryv wrote

Good question and it points to something i just do not understand. Why or why all the corporations all of a sudden insist on working from the office whereas we have the tech and data (from covid times) pointing to the fact that its better and cheaper for everyone to work remote as much as possible?

14

basilgello t1_jd7gxqh wrote

Interesting question. It is not only a lack of job moved people to urban areas. People want "easier" and "more happening" life, i.e work less but have more new pleasant moments per lifetime. Cities offer a lot of this to satisfy: museums, cafes, sport grounds. At the same time, people get used to anything and sometimes want calmer and less intensive life.

I am thinking now what happens when we finally master the affordable quantum teleportation: people would have zero reason to stay in big cities and instead would form a mesh living everywhere. Because roads would not be needed, people could live even high in the mountains and deep underwater or underland. At the same time, the more expensive something is, the less people will use it. Same applies to current intelligent data processing: burning fossil fuels is finite process, economic demand is finite as well but new shiny features will require new professions that were not possible on previous levels of technology.

If a true AI emerges, interesting how many resources will it take. The rise of the machines is a possible scenario but before the AI becomes AI (sentient and agentic) it is just a tool built by humans and to satisfy some human needs. Just like horses :)

2

darklinux1977 t1_jd7gwyo wrote

very good question ! In fact, this will be one of the last bequests of the sovereign state: the quality of the Telecom infrastructure and its resilience. For the AI and these dependencies to work, you need, among other things, cheap data, even free data, so efficient and amortized structures, only a strong sovereign state can make the ISPs bend. If a sovereign state has solved this problem, the very concept of megalopolis is dead

11