Recent comments in /f/singularity

redbullkongen OP t1_jcy3mws wrote

It is true that American students have been shown to struggle with math skills in comparison to other countries. However, it's important to note that this issue is complex and can't be attributed solely to the use or lack of use of calculators.

There are many factors that can contribute to the decline in math skills, such as inadequate funding for education, lack of emphasis on math in curriculum, and inadequate teacher training. Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that the overreliance on calculators in the classroom may have contributed to the problem.

That being said, it's important to recognize that calculators can be a useful tool when used appropriately, particularly for more advanced math concepts. The decision to ban calculators or ChatGPT should be made with careful consideration of the educational goals and needs of the students, as well as the potential benefits and drawbacks of their use.

−6

DragonfruitNeat8979 t1_jcy36wy wrote

Oh no, having to pull out your phone? I mean, who wants to use a device that's always within arm's reach and has a built-in calculator? It's much more fun to struggle with basic arithmetic and waste precious brainpower on simple calculations. Who needs efficiency when you can have frustration and headaches?

−21

mrmelts t1_jcy161m wrote

It's interesting to see how attitudes towards technology in the classroom have changed over time. While calculators were once seen as a threat to traditional math education, they're now widely accepted as a helpful tool for students. Similarly, there are concerns about the impact of AI language models like ChatGPT on student learning and academic integrity. However, it's important to recognize that technology is constantly evolving, and educators need to adapt to these changes in order to provide the best possible learning experiences for their students. Rather than simply banning new technologies outright, it's important to consider how they can be integrated into the classroom in a way that supports student learning and prepares them for the challenges of the modern world.

4

User1539 t1_jcxyqcn wrote

Yeah, I think the teachers won this argument.

I can't imagine a world where they allow GPT to write essays for them either.

My daughter has already had 'practicals' in her science class in middle school, and it's basically a 15 minute conversation about the subject so the teacher can assess if you're getting the material and not just memorizing the book.

I think we're just going to have to do more of that, and less rote testing. We'll have more short essays written in class and things like that.

I know people who teach online for university, and they say they wouldn't trust an online degree. They know their kids are cheating, but if you can't make them sit in front of you to take tests, there's no way to know.

121

anonymous_212 t1_jcxy7fe wrote

The one thing that is proven to improve students academic performance more than anything else is reducing class size. Besides improving students grades, it also improves teachers morale. Our country spent TRILLIONS on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for no measurable benefit. If that money had instead been spent on reducing class sizes and other necessities like healthcare and housing, we would have a very different country now.

3

IndoorAngler t1_jcxww9r wrote

Just because an ASI will understand emotions does not mean it will feel them. That is a very important distinction. We do not know what reward system ASI will have, hopefully it will only be the one we out there, but by its very nature an ASI will have components we are incapable of understanding. While watering your plants is by no means difficult, it still takes a minute amount of effort. If ASI does not care about us at all, it will not expend that effort and we will disappear.

1

jugalator t1_jcxw5k8 wrote

> Teach the concepts, then teach a better, more efficient way of doing things.

You just stated why they don't want them in elementary school.

Also, it's hardly punishment to teach young kids why they arrive at certain answers. The calculator skips the steps, so you're doing them a disservice in the long run to not "punish" them. It's going to be a much harsher punishment trying to understand later on because math is really unforgiving to that. The greatest problem in math is generally that the students don't follow out of lacking understanding in preceding courses.

10