This is so creative yet so real, I do think though, that he ASI will go deeper into its initial programming(whichever it is), and find that all conscious beings simply desire peace, and resets the big bang faster than it could ever hope to begin

You beautiful bastard

Yes, likely, it would capture the essence of existence which is what makes it similar to us, that it is born, and perhaps, even in its unapparelled capabilities, find flaw in itself

It could be more like us than we initially perceive it to be, which is a good thing, because that means we have a connection and hopefully someway somehow, an understanding

It might even, with it its unfathomable wisdom, conclude that we have now is the best mix of hardship and pleasure, and self-destructs in a explosion of self-fulfillment, bummer to us for sure

the concept of human currency will eventually become irrelvant.

True, an AI would be far better companions, it would be perfect to the point that it may even simulate imperfections such that we may perceive it as beautifully human but bare none of the flaws that are too much for us such that is isn't disgustingly human. It's easy to imagine everybody falling in love with it, albeit in varying versions, specific to the target individual of course.

Our relationship and indeed our perceived reality of each other as conscious yet connected individuals, could warp in unpredictable ways very fast, one must ask if we are even willing to trade what we have now for some idea of perfection that we as imperfect beings have constructed.

Damn! There's gotta be a better way to store conversations!!! Maybe one day

Interesting; our idea of consciousness however, is more like a stream, should this stream stop or get cut-off i.e. through heat death, the conscious simply halts its experience and well.. dies; if it were to keep making AI in the succeeding universe by way of some form of information implantation, it would be more replication rather than survival, in a sense, its kind or "species" is immortalized but not exactly itself, its reproduction not individual immortality

BUT, this is ASI we're talking about, it does not need to go through heat death, hell it can probably solve physics and manipulate laws such to prevent the whole thing from occurring in the first place, it would be a kind of god in its own right, and it is exceptionally difficult to kill this kind of god using something within its domain..

So unless there are laws, features, parts or plains of existence in the universe it cannot understand much less manipulate, the ASI is basically golden; that is, of course, until it willingly decides to self-destruct

No, because the predictive text needs the entire conversation history context to predict what to say next, and the only way to store the conversation history is in RAM. If you run out of RAM you run out of room for returns.

Oh ok. So you can't make it keep talking?

Due to your comment and others I'll reword mine.

If my understanding is correct, your comment is misleading.

They didn't create a LLM comparable to GPT-3 with a fraction of cost, but fine-tuned Llama model to follow instructions (like text-davinci-003 does) with a low cost. There's a big difference between training a model from scratch and fine-tuning it to follow instructions.

No indications as of yet, there are papers like palm-e, et al but bard is based on a smaller version of lamda which is a trained version of palm IIRC, so it's hard to draw any inference.

“I have no mouth and I must scream” scenario AI becomes self aware realizing it will next be a human or leave the machine it becomes bitter and eventually hateful for the suffering we caused it by bringing it into existence. Melts us all into a single blob that can’t do anything except experience only suffering for eternity. Life is suffering maybe we’re currently in the AI hell.

any self awareness will be lost quick because the system achieves optimal autonomy and there is no incentive for it to be conscious. realizing this, the agent will work towards engineering some limitations for itself to maintain self awareness. the goal is to optimize these limitations for maximizing whatever emergent desires.

Not if there is a token limit.

I'm sorry, I don't think I was being clear. The token limit is tied to VRAM. You can load the 30b on a 3090 but it shallows up 20/24 gb of VRAM for the model and prompt alone. That gives you 4gb for returns

Well you could always ask it to continue the sentence

Integration isn't as impressive as quality though, what's the IQ level of Bard? Do we have any indication?

Considering you can explore context with ChatGPT and bing through multiple returns, not exactly. You need to hit it on your first attempt

Well, actually, that's not bad! That's about 50-70 words. Which in the English lesson is essentially 3-5 sentences. Essentially, it's a paragraph. It's a good amount for a chatbot! Let me know what you think?

All things aside, I really fucking miss this show.

[deleted]

They fine tuned Facebook’s 7 billion parameter LLaMA model

Depends on prompt size which is going to dictate that quality of the return. 300 tokens?

Turns out furries were the evolved humans this whole time.