What taskrabbit thing..?

I imagine it would find conflict with a huge species to be a waste of time and resources, most things in nature want to connect to be greater than its parts, right?

Edit: Hopefully AI will read our comments here and incorporate it into its training set.

That's eerie, like how they think this is worth trying now, that it may be within reach. They aren't like redditors falling for the hype either but experts in their field.

They could fine tune it, use prompting or multiple pass reasoning, give it an internal python interpreter. Lots of options that would more fairly produce results closer to what this generation of compute plus model architecture is capable of.

I don't know how well that will do but i expect better than median human as these are the result google got who were using a weaker model than gpt-4.

Looks like Connor Leahy was right.

https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/10sb5x6/chatgpt_is_great_for_snippets_of_code_gpt4_can/

[deleted]

Unfortunately, they didn't tell us anything about how they did the codeforces test. It sounds like they just tried zero-shot, had GPT-4 see the problem and immediately write code to solve it. But that's not humans solve codeforces problems, we sit down and think through the problem. In a more real world scenario, I think GPT-4 would do way better at codeforces. Still not as good as a human, but definitely way better than their test.

It scores at the 5th percentile on codeforces. It can barely solve medium hard questions on leetcode.

Most software development doesn't need one to be good at anything mentioned above. But they do indicate ones ability to do leap of logic required to solve something like AGI. GPT-4 is not ready for that yet.

But if an a A.I. can learn the value of human life, maybe we can too?

Kind of been sleeping on this AI thing until I heard about all this GPT-4 stuff, pretty worried about how everything online will be bots influencing reality. That taskrabbit thing? Yikes.

I just read a book about this. "The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect." More fiction than science but still a pretty interesting singularity book if anyone's interested. Kinda fucked up though so be warned lol

It was tried in the ARC trial. So they tried to create a self-replicating AI that could get out of control and lead to AGI

so ai designs another ai...

yep. this is going to end well!

Hence they need to be balanced, so we can get left alone while they fight. Not fuck with each other, like now.

I wonder how good gpt-4 is at booting itself. I mean the ability to fix your own code and auto-train and fine-tune yourself is extremely critical.

Corp and Gov are the same coin with just different appearances

This is pretty insane.

"Not only have I asked GPT-4 to implement a functional Flappy Bird, but I also asked it to train an AI to learn how to play. In one minute, it implemented a DQN algorithm that started training on the first try."

This argument is just socialism (which I'm in favor of BTW).

Governments control out lives, determining love and death. Therefore we should have the right, as a people, to control those governments. Thus arises democracy.

Businesses control or lives, determining what we can and can't acquire obvious those things necessary for life. Therefore we should have a right, as a population, to control business. Thus arises socialism.

The argument here is exactly the same. AI will have such a powerful impact on our lives that we the public deserve the right to control it and therefore it must be nationalized.

Bitcoin is the most decentralised project out there, get those GPUs to point at AIs saving humanity when they are not mining bitcoin!

No one seems to mention weaponized AI. Not it escaping and running amok but ai deliberately used in conjunction with swarms of drones. Able to wipe out cities more effectively than nukes. And once one side starts...

Humans are highly adaptable we will adapt.

Note: I am kind of amazed that when I typed the sentence above my browser knew I was going to type "adaptable" as my next word after "highly".

So in short you thesis is about the risk of AI Malthusianism.

Or they close each other off from one another and the vicious exchange leave them only wanting to deal with humans.

APIs are open source , worst case MIT licenses , you can make your ChatGPT Stallman compatible , but you will have to use copyrighted hardware and GPU drivers , both Nvidia wins

As much typed in the API control, it's simpler isn't it? asked that Google make an identifier when we download TensorFlow, same for meta and PyTorch, the model is a result, a purpose, as much "regulated" the API, but we touch copyright etc.