Someone clearly played Watch Dogs 2 too much

did you try the stealth box trick on them?

>Yep, this is definitely not an adult.

I'd go out on a limb and guess Im old enough to be your parent.

So cute.

>You say "you don't know what's its like to work in security" as if you were working for the NSA.

Watch out. In another thread maskedpaki told us ALL about his WEEK of training!

> It's a simple job and a machine like in the article could do 90% of what I spent my time doing.

Thats why these machines were mostly abandoned by adopters almost entirely in 2018 right?

> Yes and you who has never worked a security job knows way more about how the job works than someone who worked it in a variety of roles and companies over years.

You know "knowing how the job works" has 0 to do with "knowing an expensive robot is a target for vandals"

How the fuck is it not stolen yet?

> a keyboard warrior who has never worked a day as a guard would know.

Yeah, you were working hard sitting on your ass.

>I was comparing the robot to static cameras. Read the conversation again you dipshit.

So you *intentionally* spoke about the wrong thing in context. Neat.

>I worked for several years. The week is for learning theory about the legal responsibilities.

For whatever chair surfing you did, sure.

What about guards who have to learn Defensive-Evassive driving and carry guns... not quite the same training is it?

You dont know shit compared to them.

Your experience as security doesn't qualify you to speak on these bots.

>You can't even distinguish work from training you absolute moron.

Man you just gotta win this huh.

>I've worked in several places spanning from retail to construction sites and yes cushy offices.

Wow.

>Read the comment dipshit. I mention that you have 0 experience with what the JOB entails. I didn't work at the JOB for a week.

Listen here Paul Blart, the purpose of this coversation was to discuss the viability of the K5 robot; that you are defending.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/18/us/security-robot-drown-trnd/index.html

https://abc7news.com/police-say-drunk-man-knocked-down-security-robot-in-mountain-view-k-5-knightscope-robots-named-k5/1915713/

Oh and when its actually needed to call security it tells you to fuck off and plays a song:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/robocop-park-fight-how-expectations-about-robots-are-clashing-reality-n1059671

Edit:

crickets chirping

Then it falls into a puddle

It an oversized iRobot.

Give me a wifi de-auther and a long stick.

We have similar robots in some of the grocery stores and malls here in Thailand. They have displays where you can search for things and you can ask the mall ones questions that they’ll reply to.

That's the whole point I've been making !

It's a simple job and a machine like in the article could do 90% of what I spent my time doing.

You say "you don't know what's its like to work in security" as if you were working for the NSA.

Security jobs are some of the simplest and most easily understood professions to ever exist.

So why don't you fill us in on the big secret? What do we not understand about security officers and how they make sure places are secure?

Yes and you who has never worked a security job knows way more about how the job works than someone who worked it in a variety of roles and companies over years.

You are a tool.

No the several years of actually being on the job and seeing how the industry works in retail construction and office spaces. But I'm sure this pales in comparison to what a keyboard warrior who has never worked a day as a guard would know.

Glorified security camera. Grifters calling themselves creators and making money selling a 300 pound slow moving rock with cameras. All this money could be better spent elsewhere.

>We are talking about the robot

I was comparing the robot to static cameras. Read the conversation again you dipshit.

>It's more than walking beats. But you'd know that if you had more than a week.

I worked for several years. The week is for learning theory about the legal responsibilities. You can't even distinguish work from training you absolute moron.

>Wow, you worked as a minimum wage guard at some cushy office after a whopping week of training.

I've worked in several places spanning from retail to construction sites and yes cushy offices.

>You had ONE WEEK of training

Read the comment dipshit. I mention that you have 0 experience with what the JOB entails. I didn't work at the JOB for a week.

> In my own experience

The week of it?

Ignore this /u/maskedpaki guy he has literally no idea what hes talking about:

>You mean the 1 week long training I did to be a security guard? You have some weird idealised version of what a security guard is.

> Cameras are hung on high ceilings. They are often hard to see from and have blindspots.

We are talking about the robot.

>Vandalising something with cameras sensors that can send an immediate distress signal is a very bad idea.

This one, the one you said has cameras.

> lol my credentials ? You mean the 1 week long training I did to be a security guard? You have some weird idealised version of what a security guard is.

I rest my case.

> humans are mostly standing on the ground in most crime scenes.

So now you remember the cameras are on the robot, convenient.

>Low is not a tactical disadvantage. Not when it can move around.

Yeah, you learned a lot about observation in that whopping week of training didn't you.

> And yet you were made by your parents

Not sure that works as well as you think it does.

> "Bro, you are really tying to convince me that a: slow moving, undefended, low to the ground, plastic, multi-thousand dollar attractive nuance is an advantage over security cameras... because... 3D Space?"

> Yup.

Meanwhile, in reality these things get attacked with barbecue sauce and tarps before being deemed pointless and expensive. (Happened in 2017)

> Because moving on the ground is like .. exactly what the job of a security guard is.

It's more than walking beats. But you'd know that if you had more than a week.

>We like walk around and observe whats going on in exactly the same way this bot does.

Yeah, but you can defend yourself from a tarp. You dont become suddenly useless cause someone sprayed sauce on you.

> What are you doubting here ?

That you are in any kind of "graduate program"

>What would one gain from lying about that.

Trying to seem more well educated in order to win this argument that you have lost horribly.

>Its not like its some high tier profession that only the select few can do. I was making 13.50 an hour.

Wow, you worked as a minimum wage guard at some cushy office after a whopping week of training.

That qualifies you so much to speak on security systems, huh?

> For someone who knows literally 0 about what the job entails you sure like to pass judgement about what makes a good security officer.

You had ONE WEEK of training.

They already have drones that will automatically fly around a property doing surveillance.

Yep, this is definitely not an adult. Don't waste your energy.