[removed]

[deleted]

someone is going to steal the security guard

I think you may be arguing with a child or a teenager. Either way, the maturity is clearly one-sided here.

They should hire more black robots.

Probably someone stole it.

there was one in a gas station in San Francisco it's not there anymore

Qualcomm messed around with these in their parking garages in the San Diego campus. They got rid of them.

>Those cameras look incredibly low to the ground to be of a tactical advantage. I highly doubt you know what you are talking about at this point. Also not sure how 3D space is relevant at all here. Explain.

Cameras are hung on high ceilings. They are often hard to see from and have blindspots.

​

>I don't need to be to know this is a shit idea, which is why I doubt your credentials.

lol my credentials ? You mean the 1 week long training I did to be a security guard? You have some weird idealised version of what a security guard is.

​

>Those cameras look incredibly low to the ground to be of a tactical advantage

humans are mostly standing on the ground in most crime scenes. Low is not a tactical disadvantage. Not when it can move around.

​

>The jokes write themselves.

And yet you were made by your parents.

​

>Bro, you are really tying to convince me that a: slow moving, undefended, low to the ground, plastic, multi-thousand dollar attractive nuance is an advantage over security cameras... because... 3D Space?

Yup.

​

​

>How does 3D space offer an advantage over cameras and motion sensors that have a vantage point?

Explain that to be "expert."

Because moving on the ground is like .. exactly what the job of a security guard is. We like walk around and observe whats going on in exactly the same way this bot does.

​

>I left willingly because the hours never seem to match well to my graduate school program.

What are you doubting here ? the reason I left being a security guard ? What would one gain from lying about that. Its not like its some high tier profession that only the select few can do. I was making 13.50 an hour.

​

>Thank god.

For someone who knows literally 0 about what the job entails you sure like to pass judgement about what makes a good security officer.

Internet and smart phones are huge. It was very hard to find out anything before than, you went to the library and had to do a lot of research and probably only going to get good enough answers, now you could get almost perfect answers (as long as humans know about it). This is why ChatGPT is such a big deal too, you get answers even faster and more exact on more topics. ChatGPT is making me feel the same as around 1995 when Internet was becoming useful for more average people.

In my own experience when a door or camera was tampered with it sent a level 1 alert to the control center of the site I was working on. Why would anyone choose a strategy that leads to several men from the control room immediately showing up where you are committing your crime in a minute or 2. This is not a good strategy or a common one.

https://media.tenor.com/f2R095nwBb8AAAAC/blanket-catbug.gif

its also a far more serious crime like how grand theft auto doesnt carry the same sentence as stealing a candy bar.

Why vandalise something that has sensors and can send a distress signal 50 milliseconds into you breaking it. You arent going to improve your chances by immediately putting a site on red alert after its surveillance systems have been messed with.

Drones are pretty noisy, but yeah CCTV is probably better anyway.

Conroy... going to feed us pills !

Vandalism of the robot would be more expensive than the common vandalism cases in the area it is protecting. If it creates a more popular target for vandalism that costs more to replace than the car or graffiti its supposedly preventing its terrible. This isn't an edge case, its a far more likely target.

Plot twist; there is a little mexican inside them.

yeah dude

>Any time something dangerous happens the police are called to resolve the issue. They have the relevant legal authority.

So again.... what is the advantage over security cameras then?

>because it can move in 3d space. Seeing things through static cameras that you cant manipulate in 3d space is like really hard.

Those cameras look incredibly low to the ground to be of a tactical advantage. I highly doubt you know what you are talking about at this point. Also not sure how 3D space is relevant at all here. Explain.

>But once again you wouldnt know about that if youve never been in the industry.

I don't need to be to know this is a shit idea, which is why I doubt your credentials.

>Call that a meme or whatever you want. Ignorance is ignorance.

It's a meme.

>Yup. Every fucking time. EVERY FUCKING TIME you show complete ignorance about what people in an industry Ive worked in actually do all day I will call you out on not knowing what you are talking about.

The jokes write themselves.

>Dont get me wrong there are people whove never worked in security who know what the job entails. You just happen not to be one of those people.

Bro, you are really tying to convince me that a: slow moving, undefended, low to the ground, plastic, multi-thousand dollar attractive nuance is an advantage over security cameras... because... 3D Space?

How does 3D space offer an advantage over cameras and motion sensors that have a vantage point?

Explain that to be "expert."

>I left willingly because the hours never seem to match well to my graduate school program.

Doubt

>I have never been fired from a security role and have been asked to return many times since leaving the industry.

Thank god.

They wouldnt be. The point is talking about edge cases like vandalism doesn't say much about the economics of automated security.

Sure some people will break bots.

Just like some people will steal packages from your front door. The macro question is whether the industry can absorb the new vandalism cases. I suspect it could.

>So it serves as an item to create a distraction?

No. It notifies the security manager when there is an issue. Security guards arent batman. The job is to observe and report. Years will go by just observing and reporting. Any time something dangerous happens the police are called to resolve the issue. They have the relevant legal authority.

​

>How does this offer an advantage over security cameras that are significantly harder to disable?

because it can move in 3d space. Seeing things through static cameras that you cant manipulate in 3d space is like really hard. But once again you wouldnt know about that if youve never been in the industry. Call that a meme or whatever you want. Ignorance is ignorance.

​

>Every fucking time. EVERY FUCKING TIME.

Yup. Every fucking time. EVERY FUCKING TIME you show complete ignorance about what people in an industry Ive worked in actually do all day I will call you out on not knowing what you are talking about. Dont get me wrong there are people whove never worked in security who know what the job entails. You just happen not to be one of those people.

​

>I can see why you use past tense.

I left willingly because the hours never seem to match well to my graduate school program. I have never been fired from a security role and have been asked to return many times since leaving the industry.

>Yh and when it's disabled it sends an alert for a human to come in person.

So it serves as an item to create a distraction?

>The idea isn't 0 humans in the loop. It's put these in the majority of a site area and have a smaller number of humans at a control center.

How does this offer an advantage over security cameras that are significantly harder to disable?

>I'm guessing youve never worked in security. Most security guards don't do anything other than alert more senior members.

Every fucking time. EVERY FUCKING TIME.

"I guess you just DONT KNOW" its a fucking meme at this point.

>I've worked security and can tell you a year can go by doing nothing more than sending a message to a security manager when something goes wrong.

I can see why you use past tense.

There is no adventage. At best it's another idea where the creator did not think about drawbacks. At worst it's investor money grift.

Exterminate

Is that music added on top of the video or does it actually make that annoying sound irl? If the latter, this will surely keep everyone away from there. Including people who live in the vicinity trying to sleep lmao.