Recent comments in /f/singularity
TinyBurbz t1_jay9lpj wrote
Reply to comment by maskedpaki in Security robots patrolling a parking lot at night in California by Dalembert
So it's a an unfixed plastic object filed with sensitive electronics that is easily disabled by a can of spray paint?
SituatedSynapses t1_jay9b97 wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in Security robots patrolling a parking lot at night in California by Dalembert
Drop kick the Narc-bot into a ditch I can guarantee you this will be a Tik Tok in some point in the future with these Roombas
Nukemouse t1_jay9apq wrote
Reply to comment by maskedpaki in Security robots patrolling a parking lot at night in California by Dalembert
Why would a human be more likely to be vandalized in a parking lot than anywhere else?
maskedpaki t1_jay96s4 wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in Security robots patrolling a parking lot at night in California by Dalembert
And ? What's your point ?
Plastic objects cant have sensors and cameras ?
TinyBurbz t1_jay8it4 wrote
Reply to comment by maskedpaki in Security robots patrolling a parking lot at night in California by Dalembert
>Vandalising something with cameras sensors that can send an immediate distress signal is a very bad idea.
It's made of plastic.
kitgainer t1_jay8ifm wrote
This is .tragic but funny https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/beserk-robot-dubbed-little-fatty-9287402
Outrageous_Nothing26 t1_jay7u99 wrote
Does it shoot something?
ftc1234 t1_jay6act wrote
Why not just have a few drones circle the parking lot and power themselves frequently at a base station? Even better, what’s wrong with CCTV cameras? Drones and CCTV cameras complement pretty well.
maskedpaki t1_jay5wyk wrote
Reply to comment by Nukemouse in Security robots patrolling a parking lot at night in California by Dalembert
A human if vandalised would cost even more.
Vandalising something with cameras sensors that can send an immediate distress signal is a very bad idea.
jeffkeeg t1_jay0y7o wrote
>tip it over
Now we can do all the crimes.
Nukemouse t1_jaxr5vu wrote
So, its a device that if vandalized costs you more than anything else that could happen in that parking lot
TinyBurbz t1_jaxqgcf wrote
Security theater.
Cant' see the advantage of this over security cameras.
Bluebotlabs t1_javppv6 wrote
Reply to comment by Nastypilot in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
And an AI...
Bluebotlabs t1_javp7s6 wrote
Reply to comment by Solid_Anxiety8176 in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
It's from I, Robot (the film, not the roomba) xD
Nastypilot t1_jav65sy wrote
Reply to comment by pastpresentfuturetim in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
Oh no, I want the led faces to stay
sb5550 t1_jauxacu wrote
Why it has to be faceless
pastpresentfuturetim t1_jauuyrd wrote
Reply to comment by Nastypilot in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
I’d imagine its just because they are prototypes. Maybe they will add faces eventually. Saw a company in russia that built a robot with humanlike skin/face. Also Ameca. Westworld will be very real it seems lol.
AwesomeDragon97 t1_jatwe1k wrote
Reply to comment by DungeonsAndDradis in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
>all for the low, low price of 2% of the country’s GDP forever.
Forever is defined as until the next coup d’etat.
AwesomeDragon97 t1_jatuvvt wrote
Reply to comment by KingRamesesII in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
Until we have viable space travel and terraforming, land will still be a limiting resource and will prevent creating a post scarcity society.
pyriphlegeton t1_jatcrb6 wrote
Looks very much like the TeslaBot.
So far, only a render and a mission statement. I hope they succeed but it's not like they provided anything yet. Everyone agrees that a humanoid robot would be cool, the question is whether one can actually build one.
Llort_Ruetama t1_jat3jks wrote
Reply to comment by StarChild413 in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
I guess for story purposes, I think even the concepts of beginning and end, of start and finish are based on human perception of space and time so are irrelevant when proposing ideas about the coming to being of creation.
Existence has no requirement to fit our understanding. We could have been entities which existed in higher dimensions, but were put in the toy box of 'space-time', and in the blink of an eye from the higher dimension have generated what we consider to be reality out of the concepts of language and pattern recognition.
The big bang could have been the opening in which the higher dimension remnants poured into the toy box, and everything that came forth was a consequence of those elements attempting to reform the nature of the higher dimensions, while being limited by the constraints of space-time.
Of course that's all speculative, but I think that's part of the joy of life, speculating. Science starts with a hypothesis, so we must keep in mind that speculation is actually the beginning of science.
(Rigorous practice, analysis and critical reasoning of the data collected is of course the body of it.)
- TL:DR; I'm procrastinating other work, so I've spent too long enjoying the thought of alternative realities.
flyblackbox t1_jaszex0 wrote
Reply to comment by Nastypilot in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
The biggest things I can think of, born in 1987.
We had to make phone calls from a phone connected to a wall at all times and if you weren’t there to answer the phone, too bad. There was no cell phone service, or World Wide Web until about 1995, and only a few people even had email in the early 90s.
Trying to navigate to a physical location was a either a guessing game or literally looking at a map and trying to figure out where you were, where you were going, and running your finger across the map to see what roads went that way. If you didn’t have a map, you had to stop and ask for directions where someone else would tell you how many turns to make or what landmarks you would see on the way.
Oh and to learn any fact, you had to either know someone knowledgeable on the topic and ask them or physically go to a library, hope that had a particular book on the topic and that someone else hadn’t already taken it out before you got there.
priscilla_halfbreed t1_jasxmdz wrote
Give it boobs and we'll talk
JenMacAllister t1_jasv4b1 wrote
Reply to comment by KingRamesesII in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
So like Star Trek...
maskedpaki t1_jayb2dz wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in Security robots patrolling a parking lot at night in California by Dalembert
Yh and when it's disabled it sends an alert for a human to come in person. The idea isn't 0 humans in the loop. It's put these in the majority of a site area and have a smaller number of humans at a control center.
I'm guessing youve never worked in security. Most security guards don't do anything other than alert more senior members. I've worked security and can tell you a year can go by doing nothing more than sending a message to a security manager when something goes wrong.