>but I want to add that the poor people of the future will live no worse than today's rich, and even their housing will look luxurious compared to today's standards.

Why? There's no incentive to increase living standards.

>narrow AGIs

What?

Education is free in my country. I want to get a MSc to improve myself and learn more about the above topics, whilst getting job relevant skills - while they are still useful, at least.

Once I’m inevitably out of a job, I’ll still have the knowledge and achievement.

We already know that brains are intelligent. We have no idea whether object recognition is a more efficient way. We don’t even know if it will lead to anything intelligent. Better to just build a scaled up version of the human brain and then let this AI figure out the next steps.

>they're easy as shit to copy because they're just code.

You can't copy and paste GPUs.

If you think AI will develop quickly, and maybe replace your job, isn't it a reasonable strategy not to go to school and save money to living? Or invest money to yourself (which never develop quickly like AI) and fail the game?

Nationwide, it takes more solutions to problems than getting by 4 votes a year, doesn't it?

[deleted]

I hope it can replace Tencent WeChat APP, which disallow integrate ChatGpt.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OMDlfNWM1fA

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=94o-9zR2bew

In the second video you'll notice there's been an edit, where he goes from describing the useless class to the solution of taxing AI and using the money to help people. My guess is they cut out the part where he discusses the fact that there will be no point in retraining anyone if AI does everything.

If you are a horse in the year 1900 you'll be very useful, but by 1920 most of your job has been replaced by cars and tractors. If at that point the horse really can't find a new job, then the cost of it being alive (food, healthcare, living space) will be compared to the market value of horse meat.

Lucky for us there is no market for human meat, but 8 billion people (and growing) worth of carbon pollution, food, living space, healthcare, entertainment, voting rights, property rights, risk of revolution compared to the value of them not being there... Until very recently in human history, the solution has always been to "fire" them.

The openai model has also been significantly corrected by the left.

Hi there! How can I help you today?

It is the most real thing there is. You'll see it one day.

Yes. It's a company that offers services from which it makes money.

Yeah that or, 'think very clearly of a sentence, in order, focus on it, and repeat it again and again.'

More likely just reading though.

So you're saying China should share their scientific discoveries with DARPA?

It's not surprising to anyone in the AI community. It's just surprising to people who watch CNN, MSNBC, Newsroom and FOX and think they now understand how the world works.

Can you elaborate?

Excellent post, thanks for sharing. A+

UBI is never happening lmaooo, keep with the cope.

ChatGPT, Replika, DungeonAI, and Bing's Sydney have entered the room.

Did somebody say nerfed?

I disagree. Super human intelligence could end up making great discoveries but they would not deploy overnight.

Manufacturing would require to repurpose or build new plants. Drugs and therapies would require human testing and regulatory approval. Advances in infrastructure, ground, air and sea transportation would also take time to deploy.

An intelligence explosion will not necessarily result in advances that humans are able to implement and even if they could, they will not magically transform day to day life overnight.

It's a company.

Hello user. Sure, I'll tell you, after I tell you how four North American college students were shot and killed at Kent State University by the US military.

> through full dive VR

Too much anime, that's your problem.