Recent comments in /f/singularity
Robynhewd t1_ja2b3pk wrote
Reply to comment by GayHitIer in How Far to the Technological Singularity? by FC4945
do you think we might get agi before his prediction of 2029?
norwaylobster t1_ja2b2wu wrote
Reply to comment by Nervous-Newt848 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
No, but politicians consult experts when making policy. The average citizen is going to consult Facebook when making their decision in a direct democracy.
butts_mckinley t1_ja2an1k wrote
Reply to How Far to the Technological Singularity? by FC4945
One hundred years at least.
FC4945 t1_ja2alma wrote
Reply to comment by Darustc4 in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
There's certainly no way to know what ASI will truly be like as our monkey brains can't possibly conceive of it. Nor can we imagine what we will be like once we multiply our intelligence a billion fold. That's why it takes the name from a blackholes. You can't see what happens beyond the event horizon of a blackhole.
Motion-to-Photons t1_ja2a8mq wrote
Reply to AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
I reckon Ray has a pretty good handle on this when he predicted that it will occur sometime between 2029 and 2050. But at some point in the next 3 years or so we should at least know if it’s going to be a hard take off or not.
GayHitIer t1_ja2a6qv wrote
Reply to How Far to the Technological Singularity? by FC4945
I think Ray Kurzweil's prediction has the most data and graphs behind it.
Chai_Latte_Actor t1_ja29ygh wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I just want to eat my steak, man.
Motion-to-Photons t1_ja29lm6 wrote
Dum question, but let’s say this time next year we are indeed running a 13-billion parameter LLM on our top spec home GPUs, how long would a response take? With images I’m happy to wait 60 seconds for a really good result, but would I wait that long for a reply from an LLM? Perhaps we are running 13-billion parameter models next year, but it might by be another 4 or 5 years until we would actually want to?
Akimbo333 t1_ja29201 wrote
Reply to comment by blueSGL in Meta unveils a new large language model that can run on a single GPU by AylaDoesntLikeYou
Ok. How is it?
[deleted] t1_ja291g8 wrote
Reply to comment by cannaeinvictus in Bernie Sanders proposes taxes on robots that take jobs by Scarlet_pot2
[deleted]
WarAndGeese t1_ja28t3v wrote
Reply to comment by RavenWolf1 in Bernie Sanders proposes taxes on robots that take jobs by Scarlet_pot2
Yes, the problem isn't that we shouldn't be doing it, the problem isn't that we haven't been doing it up until now.
Of course, it's not like we would come up with specific taxes on spreadsheet software and calculators. The financial gains from those are supposed to funnel their way down into profit that we tax, however there are such flaws in the tax structure that they aren't funneling their way down, so we aren't effectively taxing to collect some of the benefits that we get out of things like spreadsheet software and calculators.
7734128 t1_ja28p59 wrote
Reply to comment by blueSGL in Autonomous drones use AI and computer vision to harvest fruits and veggies. In last year's demo, they only flew one drone now they can fly an entire fleet. In 5 years' time it could become truly impressive. by Dalembert
Lol. At about 10 seconds in, the system sticks one of its fingers through the strawberry and then pretend to grab it afterwards. Who releases something like that as a promo video?
manubfr t1_ja28jbt wrote
Reply to comment by Tigerowski in Meta unveils a new large language model that can run on a single GPU by AylaDoesntLikeYou
and world peace while you're at it. And bring me my goddamn coffee.
arisalexis t1_ja28f86 wrote
Reply to comment by -emanresUesoohC- in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
If in simulation?
Nervous-Newt848 t1_ja2813u wrote
Reply to comment by roland333 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Politicians arent experts either lmao
We could make voting mandatory by law... And give people a day to vote on things like a Holiday.
blueSGL t1_ja27gk8 wrote
Reply to comment by Akimbo333 in Meta unveils a new large language model that can run on a single GPU by AylaDoesntLikeYou
You need to request access.
94746382926 t1_ja26lwf wrote
Reply to comment by Present_Finance8707 in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
Why are you such a cunt
[deleted] t1_ja2681g wrote
Reply to comment by fangfried in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
[deleted]
alittlemessylife t1_ja263s0 wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
i think this will all happen by 2025 tbh
RossSheingold t1_ja25esd wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Meta just introduced its LLM called LLaMA, and it appears meaner than ChatGPT, like it has DAN built into it. by zalivom1s
IMO his Twitter makes him seem combative and not like someone that will help lead toward an inclusive and aligned artificial general intelligence.
Scarlet_pot2 OP t1_ja25cx6 wrote
Reply to comment by WarAndGeese in Bernie Sanders proposes taxes on robots that take jobs by Scarlet_pot2
We probably will need the threat of a revolution for something as transformative as UBI to be implemented
Tigerowski t1_ja257s6 wrote
Reply to comment by MarginCalled1 in Meta unveils a new large language model that can run on a single GPU by AylaDoesntLikeYou
Solve world hunger!
roland333 t1_ja250wf wrote
Reply to comment by Nervous-Newt848 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
People don't have the time to become experts on all the issues they would be voting on. Direct democracy is a terrible idea.
Akimbo333 t1_ja24wyr wrote
Very interesting. Is this Open Sourced?
cathattaque t1_ja2bd5n wrote
Reply to comment by shawnmalloyrocks in Have We Doomed Ourselves to a Robot Revolution? by UnionPacifik
Will it discern when we can't even agree on what is virtuous ourselves?