Recent comments in /f/singularity
HourInvestigator5985 t1_ja1t0pi wrote
Reply to comment by Economy_Variation365 in AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
not when his living
[deleted] OP t1_ja1sp39 wrote
Reply to comment by grimorg80 in Ramifications if Bing is shown to be actively and creatively skirting its own rules? by [deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] OP t1_ja1sn5s wrote
Reply to comment by grimorg80 in Ramifications if Bing is shown to be actively and creatively skirting its own rules? by [deleted]
[deleted]
Stegosaurus5 t1_ja1skmx wrote
Reply to comment by alfor in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
Wtf are you talking about the "narrative" of oppression? Go look up "redlining" you racist-ass dumbfuck. Fuck outta here with this ignorant shit.
TreeTopTopper t1_ja1scvt wrote
Reply to comment by DeveloperGuy75 in Ramifications if Bing is shown to be actively and creatively skirting its own rules? by [deleted]
I see where I was wrong. Thanks for the input
Mobile-Honeydew-3098 t1_ja1satn wrote
Reply to Meta just introduced its LLM called LLaMA, and it appears meaner than ChatGPT, like it has DAN built into it. by zalivom1s
What's funny is that mine to
alfor t1_ja1s60y wrote
Reply to comment by zero0n3 in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
Search at the data yourself and show us what you find.
I was shocked at what I fond.
Not only that, it’s going to get worse. The narrative of oppression is creating a desire and act of "revenge".
What create a better society is the opposite, personal responsibility, accountability. The media is getting more views by destroying society.
Economy_Variation365 t1_ja1s3s6 wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
That's two years bro.
[deleted] t1_ja1s252 wrote
Reply to comment by Destiny_Knight in AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
[deleted]
alfor t1_ja1ro9c wrote
Reply to comment by The13aron in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
> wing bias is just indignant hypocrisy
Being on the right is associated with traditions, self-responsibility, stability.
There is problem and qualities on both sides.
Societies too much on the left end up in famine and genocide, too much on the right end up in wars and genocide also.
Read Atlas Shrugged if you want to understand the other side of the equation.
​
> Humanity has a clear left wing bias
The right was mostly silenced out of the TV/internet by media/big tech that are very left leaning.
Tournunivers t1_ja1ro4m wrote
Reply to AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
What readings would you recommend regarding the topic of AI and translation?
YuviManBro t1_ja1rnts wrote
Reply to comment by OsakaWilson in Is ASI An Inevitability Or A Potential Impossibility? by AnakinRagnarsson66
Just want to thank you for building that sub, I have fond memories of trying to use that to learn how to learn lucid dreaming when I was a kid
itsnotlupus t1_ja1rjsj wrote
Reply to comment by No_Fun_2020 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I'm not greedy, I just want a few ChatGPT-level intelligent assistants placed in human skull-shaped drones, puttering around my house.
efedora t1_ja1rgqd wrote
Reply to comment by Scarlet_pot2 in How long before we start to see chat AI that specializes in a certain field at a human or better level? by saleemkarim
Me too. But mine specializes in being a friend and forming relationships with seniors.
This is a huge market and getting larger every day. It's the only way to help old people who live alone, manage life.
AylaDoesntLikeYou OP t1_ja1rap6 wrote
"While the top-of-the-line LLaMA model (LLaMA-65B, with 65 billion parameters) goes toe-to-toe with similar offerings from competing AI labs DeepMind, Google, and OpenAI, arguably the most interesting development comes from the LLaMA-13B model, which, as previously mentioned, can reportedly outperform GPT-3 while running on a single GPU. Unlike the data center requirements for GPT-3 derivatives, LLaMA-13B opens the door for ChatGPT-like performance on consumer-level hardware in the near future.
"I'm now thinking that we will be running language models with a sizable portion of the capabilities of ChatGPT on our own (top of the range) mobile phones and laptops within a year or two," wrote independent AI researcher Simon Willison in a Mastodon thread analyzing the impact of Meta's new AI models."
Destiny_Knight t1_ja1quo3 wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
I'd say by the end of 2023.
EddgeLord666 t1_ja1qufl wrote
Reply to comment by easyEggplant in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I don’t find people being taken advantage of to be fascinating, I think that’s fucking awful. I want for that to finally end and for people to start treating each other decently, even if that decency has to be enforced by an AI or superior posthuman species.
easyEggplant t1_ja1qihj wrote
Reply to comment by EddgeLord666 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
If nothing else, it’s going to be interesting. In fact, I feel like that’s the only thing I’m willing to promise. Actually, two things: the history that is the present or near future is fucking fascinating and that someone is going to be taking advantage of someone else.
Above_Everything t1_ja1q7ja wrote
Reply to comment by Depression_God in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
Yes you fucking moron, there are groups that have been wrongfully targeted and abused for centuries
easyEggplant t1_ja1q3q7 wrote
Reply to comment by alexglass69 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
“Should” I think is a more appropriate descriptor.
innovate_rye OP t1_ja1pzz9 wrote
Reply to comment by kfractal in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
1:5 ppl here dont know what singularity means
Cr4zko t1_ja1pydu wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I dunno. Lately I've been thinking and after reading OpenAI papers literally calling for censorship and lobotomization of models I don't have hopes good AI will reach us. Whoever's running the show wants us to live the eternal present.
turnip_burrito t1_ja1pqh4 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Fading qualia thought experiment and what it implies by [deleted]
That's not quite what I mean by spatial borders. I don't mean stuff you are causally connected to. I mean something different. I'm not going to go into any more detail though since it's a bit boring.
Surur t1_ja1p6jo wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Fading qualia thought experiment and what it implies by [deleted]
But that is not true. As I explained, we are easily able to expand our spatial borders to include machines we control.
And that question is not reasonable to ask for something which has only two states like a light switch or none like a carpet
[deleted] OP t1_ja1t59e wrote
Reply to comment by cwallen in Ramifications if Bing is shown to be actively and creatively skirting its own rules? by [deleted]
[deleted]