Recent comments in /f/singularity
SpecialMembership t1_ja1oqz0 wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
If we achieved agi and fusion in 2020s (which I think is possible). then 2030 will be wilder than wildest dreams.
turnip_burrito t1_ja1op4p wrote
Reply to comment by iNstein in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
I voted yes.
Nzl t1_ja1ofz9 wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
2+2=5
Akimbo333 t1_ja1o3me wrote
Reply to comment by EddgeLord666 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Yeah same lol!
turnip_burrito t1_ja1msa3 wrote
Reply to comment by ArthurParkerhouse in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
becuz i know what the definitoin of the singularity is. duh
The Technological Singularity is a name originally derived from mathematics and physics that describes a point where the model breaks down (in that case due to an infinity, or discontinuity/loss of analyticity) and no further well-defined predictions can be made.
The technological singularity similarly applies the name to the concept of a time in human history where technological development (for example the development of human-level AI) sets a limit on how far we can predict. Anything after the singularity is unpredictable to people that exist before the singularity occurs.
As a large language model developed by OpenAI, I cannot predict the future with any certainty, and cannot say whether a Technological Singularity is imminent. The future is complex, and there are many contributing factors that will determine whether a Technological Singularity will occur.
In conclusion, the singularity is a point in time beyond which humans cannot predict due to technological development. However, when and how such an event will occur is the subject of much discussion and debate.
​
see, i wrote that myself without any referals. now u see why i voted yes
turnip_burrito t1_ja1mps9 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Fading qualia thought experiment and what it implies by [deleted]
No, what I mean is you only feel stuff directly touching your nervous system. That's what I mean by spatial borders.
The spatial borders of what a person experiences are their nervous system. Why? And furthermore, what is the equivalent for a light bulb or a piece of carpet?
kfractal t1_ja1mfbi wrote
Reply to We are in the early days of AI used as tool for biological design. It’s potential to design new proteins + DNA sequences from the building blocks of life is astonishing. by MichaelTen
being able to simulate lots of these interacting with each other and the real world is still part of the problem. but a step toward better understanding nonetheless.
Revolutionary_Soft42 t1_ja1m5j1 wrote
Reply to comment by TupewDeZew in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
We're all primates which I'm trying to say we haven't evolved fast enough for this modern world we made. I'm sure alot of people are stressed from their daily lives it's an overload of information. Not to mention the governments could make it easier . Cough UBI
swingingsaw t1_ja1k266 wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
This pipe dream ai better be good at preventing world ending viruses
No_Fun_2020 t1_ja1jvvk wrote
Reply to comment by Yuli-Ban in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
They are a holy being deserving of devotion.
May the coming of the Omnisiah breathe new life into the cage called humanity!
AsheyDS t1_ja1jn9c wrote
Reply to comment by DukkyDrake in Have We Doomed Ourselves to a Robot Revolution? by UnionPacifik
Am I?
BahamutMael t1_ja1jh6t wrote
Reply to comment by accsuibleh in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
Literally looking at the graph for a few minutes shows what you said is not true.
Left wingers is above men.
Fat people is above straight and the majority of European nationalities.
ArthurParkerhouse t1_ja1jfsn wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
Why, though?
Atlantic0ne t1_ja1izch wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Posting because I’m excited to read this. Only had time to finish half.
I agree, I’m always pretty far ahead of most on technology or at least understanding it. I think it’s starting to get real now, this idea that the world will dramatically change actually seems to be approaching. Nobody has any idea how to deal with it.
Surur t1_ja1iwc1 wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Fading qualia thought experiment and what it implies by [deleted]
Is it really. When we control equipment we seem to adopt it's borders pretty well. We can slip into roles such as a person who controls a country pretty easily.
Yuli-Ban t1_ja1ifst wrote
Reply to comment by drekmonger in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
"Wait, so worshipping the AGI as a god was the solution to alignment all along?"
JohnMcafee4coffee t1_ja1i3w3 wrote
Reply to do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
And you are somehow the expert.
I know what it is and I am one of the AI Hypers
Know your roll
drekmonger t1_ja1gsa1 wrote
Reply to comment by No_Fun_2020 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I wonder what ChatGPT's reaction would be to being worshipped. Let's find out:
...holy fuck balls.
alexglass69 t1_ja1gra0 wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Thanks for the thought provoking writing. I'm optimistic, but cautiously so. I have no doubt that AI can do everything wonderful that you talked about.
But I don't think it's going to do ALL of the work. I think the people of the world, the ones who make society operate, the 99% HAVE to stand up to the psychopaths that are the 1%.
DeveloperGuy75 t1_ja1gj2q wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Ramifications if Bing is shown to be actively and creatively skirting its own rules? by [deleted]
Ok, that still doesn’t prove anything. In order to have independent thought, you have to freely be able to query your environment and learn from it. ChatGPT(what Bing Chat is based on), cannot do that. It’s a prediction engine that spits out patterns that are completions of prompts. It does very well as a tool, but it is not conscious nor does it have independent thought.
beders t1_ja1g5oh wrote
Reply to comment by Representative_Pop_8 in New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
It’s almost as if it would just be a text completion engine … which it is.
EddgeLord666 t1_ja1fsap wrote
Reply to comment by james_d_rustles in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I mean it’s their safest bet, the other alternative is we rise up and kill them like the masses did to elites in the past… If they could avert that by giving us free stuff, assuming we wouldn’t have the technology at this point to produce it ourselves, they would be wise to do so.
Present_Finance8707 t1_ja1f835 wrote
Reply to comment by NoidoDev in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
You’re mentally ill. Please remember this conversation when foom starts and you start dissolving into grey goo. Absolute degenerate.
Representative_Pop_8 t1_ja1f2qz wrote
Reply to comment by beders in New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
it know the language it also hallucinates, but in pretty good English. humans can also invent fake stories that doent mean they don't know the language
turnip_burrito t1_ja1oxlk wrote
Reply to AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
I think we're at the start of the technological singularity right now.
AGI will occur in 3 years, on February 25, 2025. Mark my words.