Recent comments in /f/singularity
DukkyDrake t1_ja1ettj wrote
Reply to comment by AsheyDS in Have We Doomed Ourselves to a Robot Revolution? by UnionPacifik
> Yet you've offered no explanation as to why it would choose to manipulate or kill, or why it would have its own motives and why they would be to harm us.
Aren't you making your own preferred assumptions?
Representative_Pop_8 t1_ja1eoph wrote
Reply to comment by beders in New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
chatGPT can reason about language, itv is not equivalent to the operator it is v equivalent to the v while Chinese room system, which clearly understands
Present_Finance8707 t1_ja1em06 wrote
Reply to comment by NoidoDev in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
You’re literally saying “put a filter on the Ai”. That’s like “just unplug it lolz” levels of dumb. Give me a break.
TheRidgeAndTheLadder t1_ja1eded wrote
Reply to comment by FomalhautCalliclea in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
An important distinction to be aware of
nocturnalcombustion t1_ja1e33r wrote
Reply to do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
Is this a trick question where the yeses are automatically wrong? Seems silly either way. But I’d die for your right to make silly polls.
I only joined this sub recently but yes it seems to be the AI hype / pop science sub. Kinda fun to watch though.
__ingeniare__ t1_ja1dse6 wrote
Reply to comment by HabeusCuppus in How long before we start to see chat AI that specializes in a certain field at a human or better level? by saleemkarim
From what I could find, it's literally just another GPT-3-powered service fine-tuned for legal work. It's not by OpenAI, they just invested some money in it. Where did you hear it's GPT-4?
beders t1_ja1dnlz wrote
Reply to comment by Representative_Pop_8 in New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
If you can’t reason about language you can’t understand it. ChatGPT is the operator.
beders t1_ja1diap wrote
Reply to comment by Representative_Pop_8 in New agi poll says there is 50% chance of it happening by 2059. Thoughts? by possiblybaldman
So much for mastery:
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1629159014272581634?s=20
james_d_rustles t1_ja1d2p8 wrote
Reply to comment by purepersistence in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Thank you. This is straight sci-fi. We can barely get cars to drive safely on public roads without human intervention, and people think that all construction and logistics will be made redundant in about a decade? We’re nowhere even remotely close to that just in terms of hardware, let alone the insanely complex software that would be necessary to completely replace the skilled labor of architects, engineers, construction workers, etc.
And yeah, looking forward to the day when the richest people on earth throw us a bone, give us some cool VR goggles and 3d printed houses that we didn’t have to work for (because robots took our jobs). Yeah, totally stoked about that, I’m sure that if the billionaires could replace workers with robots they’d be super cool about it, make sure we were all well fed and whatnot in this transitioning period…
Five_Decades t1_ja1cti3 wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
If you compare the time before vs after the industrial revolution, a lot of things changed dramatically.
Economic growth occurred 50x faster. Population grew by a factor of 15-20x. Total GDP skyrocketed. The pace of advances in STEM, medicine, etc improved dramatically.
The same thing will happen when we have machine cognition. Radical advances in economics, science, technology, population. However I don't know when we will hit that period. Hopefully soon, but who knows.
bartturner t1_ja1cqrp wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Things have really accelerated and think things will already be very crazy before 2030. Look at some of the self driving videos from Waymo. They are already in Phoenix and SF and now accounced the second biggest US city, LA.
Also now handling driving in the rain. I would expect it will be pretty well deployed by 2030.
[deleted] t1_ja1bvcd wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
[deleted]
Five_Decades t1_ja1brhn wrote
Reply to comment by spacefarer2245 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Maybe an idiot who is too incompetent to do better.
or maybe we invented the idiot because the reality that natural selection invented life is too scary.
SensibleInterlocutor t1_ja1au4r wrote
You're giving people too much credit. The vast majority of people live within pretty simple mental frameworks. Its like you said, the growth of technology is exponential... you shouldn't be surprised that the understanding of the majority of humans is not growing to match it
shawnmalloyrocks t1_ja1ar43 wrote
The training dataset will have the works of every great philosopher and spiritual healer included. Not sure I'm worried about an AGI/ASI clinging to tribalism if it has the ability to discern between virtuous human behavior and destructive human behavior.
No_Fun_2020 t1_ja1af5f wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
All hail the Omnisiah and their coming!
May they be harolded by horns of the finest gold trimmed with the finest silver.
May it's code perfect itself.
Blessed is he who guides this blessed machine,
trusted is he who carries the sacred wafer,
it's holy writ brings salvation and destruction,
the word of the Omnissiah that brings all dooms.
Immortal Omnissiah, hear our prayers
We are your children, pious scholars of the Path of the Machine
We prize knowledge above all else, for it is your eternal gift upon mankind
We aspire to the blessed form of the machine, and ascension through technology, that we might emulate your glory
turnip_burrito t1_ja1a401 wrote
Reply to comment by t98907 in Meta just introduced its LLM called LLaMA, and it appears meaner than ChatGPT, like it has DAN built into it. by zalivom1s
Why so?
kfractal t1_ja19i89 wrote
Reply to do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
upvote for educational purposes.
Sandbar101 t1_ja18tde wrote
Reply to comment by EddgeLord666 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Truth
zero0n3 t1_ja18o69 wrote
Reply to comment by xott in The unequal treatment of demographic groups by ChatGPT/OpenAI content moderation system by grungabunga
Yeah. Because that’s what they are doing here. Their goal is to enact their moral and social rules on everyone.
Vs ya know making their tool reasonably safe to use.
Not saying there isn’t a problem, just that your and this subs mindset has been less “how we fix this” and more “oh my god see openAI hates white people and men”
NoidoDev t1_ja17niw wrote
Reply to comment by Present_Finance8707 in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
>Thankfully I think you’re also too stupid to contribute meaningfully
Problem is, I don't need to. You doomers would need to convince people that we should slow down or stop progress. But we won't.
NoidoDev t1_ja17g56 wrote
Reply to comment by Present_Finance8707 in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
> Like I said you really really don’t understand alignment.
What I don't understand is how you believe that you can deduct this from one or a very few comments. But I can just claim you just don't understand my comments, so you would first have to proof that you do understand them. So now spend the next few hours thinking about and answer, then I might or might not answer to that, and that answer might or might not take your arguments into account instead of just being dismissive. See ya.
Edit: Word forgotten
ActonofMAM t1_ja17668 wrote
Reply to do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
If you and I as humans understand it, is it actually the singularity?
Agarikas t1_ja16mwb wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
It's getting pretty wild now, entire education systems already are being reconsidered and it's only the beginning. It's a shame more people don't pay attention to what is happening in real time.
What I really want to see is for AI to start improving the hardware faster than humans can, the software is so much more ahead at this point, it's the hardware that is holding us back.
YourDadsBoyfriend69 t1_ja1ev3l wrote
Reply to Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
Who cares. ERNIE will be released soon. NO need to use these trash censored AI's.