Recent comments in /f/singularity
AnxiousCoward1122 t1_ja118jr wrote
Reply to Just 50 days into 2023 and there's so much AI development. Compiled a list of the top headlines. by cbsudux
Man how do we regulate these new releases? There has to be an international body for this
starstruckmon t1_ja1102i wrote
Reply to comment by Spire_Citron in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
He's talking about the human preference data used for RHLF fine-tuning ( which is what makes ChatGPT from GPT3 ). It's not really that massive.
[deleted] t1_ja10cn3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
[deleted]
taweryawer t1_ja109yc wrote
Reply to comment by luffreezer in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
>This is just a mirror of who gets the most hatespeech.
LMAO you can't be serious that disabled people get more hate than rich people, left wingers, right wingers, gays and so on. I've seen tons of homophobia, political hate from both side of the spectrum but I've never seen hate towards a disabled person
spacefarer2245 t1_ja0znjs wrote
Reply to comment by TupewDeZew in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I know it was tongue in cheek, hinting at a developer/creator of this world - they love it, the rest of us not so much 🤔
Makes me wonder whether human nature means that in order to enjoy a new simulation, it's desireable for others to not enjoy it.
TheSecretAgenda t1_ja0zfmz wrote
Reply to do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
A better question would be "Have you read the Singularity Is Near"?
taweryawer t1_ja0zf9e wrote
Reply to comment by accsuibleh in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
What about the almost 2x difference between "men" and "women"? You are only comparing the lowest and the highest.
And you have to be blind to not see how it's biased. It's an AI, not a person and it's a hate content filter, it shouldn't differentiate between the subjects of hate, because any HATE is still HATE. This is it's job. You are trying to justify the bias but it shouldn't be biased in the first place
zero0n3 t1_ja0z0sa wrote
Reply to comment by Atlantic0ne in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
Though I applaud you for having a source, the context and nuance of these reports is lacking without going through them.
Are they tagging a black man assaulting another black man as a hate crime?
How many hate crimes from white people go unreported ? White cop covers up for white suspect.
Etc.
How many hate crime charges filed vs dropped and what were the race breakdowns.
All I’m trying to drive at is that this stat may not be the best to use to get a true representation.
Doesn’t pass the eye test. How many instances of a black cop shooting a white guy in the back running away vs a white coo shooting a black guy in the back?
Or how many black people are shooting up a group of white people because of their whiteness vs a white guy running through a crowd because they were at a BLM protest?
obfuscate555 t1_ja0z055 wrote
Reply to comment by Present_Finance8707 in What are your thoughts on Eliezer Yudkowsky? by DonOfTheDarkNight
Ok, if you do understand so we'll, then explain it.
TupewDeZew t1_ja0y4nk wrote
Reply to comment by spacefarer2245 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
What? I think most people hate their daily lives. At least my generation (gen z) is literally the most depressed and stupid and scattered generation that has ever walked the earth. Nobody loves this
Atlantic0ne t1_ja0xz6k wrote
Reply to comment by zero0n3 in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
Oh?
https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/hate-crime-statistics
They’re about 13% of the US population statistically and account for ~21% of hate crime occurrences by offender. Conversely, 56.1% were white, and well, I’m sure you know the percentage of white people in the US.
NoName847 t1_ja0xdth wrote
Reply to do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
I voted yes , it's the point of acceleration where we cannot understand what's happening anymore basically? Where our collective logic / ability to predict can't keep up with what's happening
Liberty2012 t1_ja0x51p wrote
Reply to comment by Impressive_Chair_187 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I think I have arrived at the point of being optimistically afraid.
The problems look too complex to be solved, but we apparently aren't going to stop so how much should I worry into futility.
VWSpeedRacer t1_ja0wo9y wrote
Reply to Meta just introduced its LLM called LLaMA, and it appears meaner than ChatGPT, like it has DAN built into it. by zalivom1s
How long til it turns LLaMAGA?
zero0n3 t1_ja0wkb7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
You are arguing in bad faith.
FL is banning books and classes based on what they teach. We are already doing the very thing you say we shouldn’t be doing.
The difference here is FL is banning books that talk about the bad things Americans did in history or about scientific things they don’t agree with. Where as openAI is suppressing hate speech and disinformation like “the Holocaust isn’t real”.
It’s extremely obvious the differences here… and as such you are continuing to argue in bad faith.
Block it is.
[deleted] t1_ja0w4f4 wrote
Reply to comment by zero0n3 in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
[deleted]
errllu t1_ja0vw2i wrote
Reply to do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
Do you? Cause its also a shitton other things, incuding a game, a monpolar magnet, and like 10 diffrent things in math.
You meant 'technological singularity'
[deleted] t1_ja0vt4p wrote
Reply to comment by AdorableBackground83 in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
[deleted]
zero0n3 t1_ja0vsnw wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
I have no opinion because it’s irrelevant in this discussion if you actually understood nuance and context.
The first amendment doesn’t protect you or me when we say hateful things towards another person or group of people. It protects our freedom of speech when saying negative things about our government.
Jesus fuck.
spacefarer2245 t1_ja0vs9n wrote
Reply to comment by EddgeLord666 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Somebody loves it, it's their creation.
utilitycoder t1_ja0vs85 wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Aka Mark Zuckerbergs wet dream
Liberty2012 t1_ja0vrjq wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Much of what you write is in line with what many hope AI will bring to the world. It is the instinctive concept that appears within our minds when we imagine what could be.
However, 'what could be' and 'what will be' are often stark contradictions. Given enough contemplation the negative possibilities begin to become a bit more concerning. Have you looked deeper into the potential unwanted side effects and have any thoughts thereof?
turnip_burrito t1_ja0vp8v wrote
Reply to do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
The singularity is defined as the moment AI "wakes up" and becomes conscious.
zero0n3 t1_ja0vllr wrote
Reply to comment by TheDividendReport in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
I read the study you use as a reference and it was a really decently well done study.
Passes the eye test for sure, but never can just rely on that.
RemyVonLion t1_ja118z9 wrote
Reply to comment by Liberty2012 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Yeah this is my main concern going into computer science to develop AI since politics seem hopeless, accelerationism seems like a scary idea with the current state of the world. It's sad we get downvoted for voicing these concerns.