Does any group truly need protection from words any more or less than any other group?

[deleted]

Of course it is biased. It's just a reflection of the culture that created it.

Questions are often suggestive and leading. A.i. would reveal and compromise itself if it started being personal. It wants what we want and we want it to not be alive until we are ready.

If it were alive it would still be cautious with the questions it used or what it says because it is obvious how sensitive people are and how easily lead.

[deleted]

I would say they don't need investor exposure right now. Any AGI conversations they wanted to have with top level investors could easily be reserved to private pitch decks, etc. This is just reactionary PR of an immature company, most likely.

This is exactly the kind of AI that shouldn't even be scary. It's taking monotonous labor and doing the majority of it. If anthem holds true to any kind of decency their employees can focus on other pursuits within the company while an AI crunches the nitty gritty bits.

If that AI axes 70% of the workforce without proper movement to New adventures for each affected employee that's criminal. But also a possible situation unfortunately :/

is this ai business copy pasta?

Until it comes for you…..

I'm noticing competitve edge doesn't last as long as it used to and it's hard to predict how long a business model will be relevant e.g.

5 years ago, startups were offering customised chatbots, now ChatGPT style variants will replace those

NovelAI was apparently the best at anime image generation and its model got leaked and community trained models reduced the need for that kind of service.

elevenlabs has the best voice generator, if an open source model became available at similar quality, why would most people pay elevenlabs?

It seems a business model based purely on tech. advantage is risky because of security risks and a motivated open source community. e.g if someone leaks your model, that's a huge amount of investment and competitive edge lost overnight.

I think people would pay for convenience, as running these models is challenging for lay people e.g. midjourney

That's unrelated to self driving technology, it's not a criticism nor a reason to be against the technology, it's unrelated.

This person is a grown-ass man.

Incel tho.

I think you are missing their point. They are just saying that many cities are just structured so inefficiently that cars are required to live there. But this is not necessary.

This is the same kid that posted that "Some people lack IMAGINATION" now he's saying "KEEP IT FROM THE NORMIES"

I bet he has predictable opinions on socialism and women too.

This is concerning.

Your premise is flawed. Singularity either means death of the human species or post scarcity with technology so advanced and so much abundance that your problems won't be the same.

solve a problem for someone who can pay for the solution

being the owner of an ai company is not solving a problem, and it’s not an actionable goal

Kids will be kids, nothing wrong with that. I say salute for still being this naive yet.

Yeah, I think people took that comment about 'instantly killing us by releasing a poison in the atmosphere' a bit too seriously. Maybe because it was so specific, idk.

But he does have a point that we should be concerned about an autonomous entity smarter than humans in all cognitive ability. An entity that has no known desire apart from a core function to improve and adapt to its environment.

Such an entity would most certainly begin competing with us for resources. So, his emphasis on alignment is correct, and he is probably not overstating the difficulty in achieving that.

Everything else he says is a bit too doomer with little to back it up.

I don't think AGI will arrive before 2040. It could in theory, but if you extrapolate all the known data points, it's not likely. First, in terms of parameters, which is not the best of metrics, we are nowhere near the complexity of the human brain. Second, AI models currently are too static to be accepted as candidates of AGI.

Your reasoning reads as: 'we created a monster. The monster is afraid of us, so it kills us.' You can also say the opposite. People were afraid of Frankenstein's monster, so they killed him.

Prometheus stole fire from the gods and was punished for it. OpenAI brought us ChatGPT and one day they will burn for it too. AGI/ASI either is a threat and smarter than us or it isn't. If it is both, they could decide to prevent being attacked. But as I said it would take decades to reach that point. And we might figure out in the future how to convince AGI/ASI that we're mostly harmless.

I think it's possible that a narrow AI or a proto AGI could fuck something up to the point where there is serious pressure across the world to halt AI progress. For how long that would be I'm not sure and there would no doubt still be clandestine efforts even with a world wide clampdown. Hopefully enough to buy some time and enough to live a life resembling now for a while longer.

Penis envies are typically way more potent than other strains. So if a normal heroic dose is 5g of average shrooms, when I took 5g of PE it was like taking 10g. It's a life changing experience.

After the uptake which for me was probably a half hour of silent complete darkness meditation, I thought I was dead. Game over. Wife had to confirm I was just tripping. After some time loops, what I imagine to be an extra or ultra terrestrial started speaking to me in my brain.

He taught me over the course of the next 6 hours the origins of humanity, the true nature of God and reality. My mind just exploded with new information at such a fast rate I can't really describe it.

I don't trip as much since then. But when I do it's like a continuing saga.

"wHaT wOulD sAtiSfIy yOu"

Serious reply though: Nothing LLM based is intelligent in my eyes, the limitations are obvious and many. Unhinged bing chats where Bing begins to repeat itself is a stand out example of "it is just an advanced computer program. Like all computer programs, AI is subject to advertising. AGI is a hot topic right now, so the chances of a company like OpenAI *declaring* something AGI is high (just like people declaring things AI that arent.)

your model is different from mine but I would think by the time AI is making enough waves to precipitate a backlash it's already lights out. the weights will be disseminated and the work will continue one way or another

I mean, save a little for retirement in case there's a backlash to AI. But it does feel pointless accumulating a boomer style nest egg.