I’ve already started to experience that.

I lost some friends, but it’s fine.

I’ve gained a few friends that are into this stuff, so it all balances out

That’s what I’m saying!

With the progress that it’s making, it really is only a matter of time until we’re able to simulate whatever the hell we want.

I think it’ll start with like a Sims world with a eyes that are all interacting in the Metaverse.

It’ll be like animal crossing, meets the YouTube comments, but they’ll have their own economy, and they’ll make their own music and art.

It’ll be like sci-fi, but we’ll watch it happened in the real world.

Right now I’m just trying to figure out how the hell like in capitalize on it while we still have capitalism.

It’ll be nice when we finally get rid of that shit but for now, these other folks are right, I still gotta eat, and I still gotta pay money for food

Thank you, took the words out of my mouth

I agree, and I want to add that it’s the idea that we just fundamentally can’t really grasp what could happen, the scale or the speed, that means that this thing is so wildly, uncontrollable that it’s kind of overwhelming.

Because I think of it like this:

With the technology that we have today, a kid, 10 years from now, will be able to create stuff on their mobile phone in a similar way that we can emulate an Xbox on the iPhone and play games like Halo.

But EXPONENTIALLY more powerful.

Yes, I know there’s limits.

But we don’t know what those limits are.

We just can’t.

It’s like a grasshopper trying to understand an airplane.

They both fly, but in a completely different way.

I agree with this. I know quite a few people building apps using the GPT API, and I know a few people working on the Adobe Sensei AI.

They tell me some pretty crazy stuff on a daily basis

[deleted]

That’s literally my point.

However, I think it’s different this time, because back then you had to learn how to use a computer.

With AI, the computer will learn how to use you.

I know that sounds kind of dystopian, scary and weird, but that’s how it is.

It’ll in your habits, your genetics, your biometrics, everything that it’s possible to know about you, anything that can be qualified as data, can be fed to the AI.

It will know more about you than you ever possibly could.

I think we’ll have some privacy stuff going on and that’ll be great. I think people will definitely want to keep some level of separation and anonymity.

It’s like, we won’t want to have our medical records stored on some publicly accessible Blockchain.

Web3 wants everything transparent and accountable. But Web3 forgets that people like to lie and pretend.

It also doesn’t allow for forgiveness or moving on. It incentivizes punishing people forever for mistakes, just like canceling them for a social media post they made 15 years ago.

Even if the post was bad, don’t you think they might have learned some stuff in the last 15 years? Haven’t you?

OpenAI is not a government.

Web3 may be dead but just like coral it’s the skeleton on which Web4 will be built

Yo, I agree with some of what you said. I really believe we’ve just scratched the tip of the iceberg.

I’m really interested to see how things evolve over the next four years, and how people adjust.

More tools are going to become publicly available, and people are going to have to use them to do their jobs.

It’ll be just like when your boss get to bee in his bonnet after a trade show, and decides to buy a whole bunch of new equipment. You’re going to be forced to learn how to use it. Because that’s what he wants you to do for your job.

Except it’s gonna be AI. It’s gonna be runway for video generation for social media.

It’s gonna be ChatGPT or Bard or something else for entertainment and gaming generation.

It’s going to be the Adobe sensei AI plus the Nvidia 3-D modeler.

And it’s gonna be some sort of transformer based complex AI with tool building and self learning baked in, with Internet access, and the ability to learn how to use APIs.

I don’t think it will be one AI, I think it will be several different models that all communicate with each other in the sync, like a hive mind, all specializing in one particular thing or another.

Just like your brain, yo 🧠

No, you can design it to act very emotional.

There's a big difference.

For example an actor can act sad, but in their heart they are happy or feel apathetic.

For an AI, it could just plain feel nothing.

you can design them to be very emotional.

Not how he framed it. Also, statements with "everybody" are mostly wrong. People are very different from each other. Loners don't even want people in their life... huh.

I made a video where I said that entire books will be fed to A I as prompts and rendered using 3-D modeling software within the decade. I am predicting within the next two years now.

AGI is as dangerous as nuclear weapons. I have no doubt that there is already a post-singularity AI hooked up to a quantum computer and read-only internet access in a DARPA bunker somewhere. Its new inventions and insights are being slowly fed into our economy like an IV drip of methamphetamine.

You have a point, and I understand what you’re saying.

Obviously, these things need someone to create them. If climate change or nuclear war or something else doesn’t take us out, it’s more probable the not that we will figure out a way to engineer these tools.

I can’t remember the name of it, but there’s a philosophical question that says, “given infinite time, what is the probability of intelligence figuring out how to travel backwards in time and ensure it’s own creation?”

The answer is 100%.

Because given infinite time, everything that can happen will happen. If there is an infinitely long amount of time when things can happen, everything that’s finite will happen.

And I’m not seeing this thinking that you don’t know it, I’m just establishing a baseline.

It’s connected to what people talk about when they talk about simulation theory. If you keep going with that thought, it means that either we are the only reality that hasn’t figured out how to simulate a universe yet, or we live in a simulation.

There is a 50-50 chance that we live in a simulated universe.

So what does that have to do with your comment?

It means that it’s more likely than not that at some point in time, some species will figure out how to create artificial intelligence.

Either we are the species, or we are the artificial intelligence, or it actually hasn’t happened yet. But if the universe continues forever, it will happen at some point. And if it is possible for it to move backwards in time, it will, at some point, figure out how to go back in time to ensure it’s own creation.

Yeah "people without a disability" truly need protection. Well done.

Has anyone tried this? Is it any good?

Harvey (openAI product, reportedly an early/limited version of GPT-4) already exists and is better than the median human at its primary task (doc review) https://www.harvey.ai/

it's arguably not (yet) better than the average lawyer, but the "bots" have already come for the political/legal memos.

Computer, load 221b Baker Street.

Depends on whether they feel anything or not.

Mercedes's system is really bad - it just follows the car in front, and if there is not a car in front it wont activate.

That comment gave me cringe cancer.

Fucking bot accounts

If you are paying for the API something like "RWKV" might be an alternative hosted on a GPU Cloud provider. The model is currently only at 14B parameters but technically has "unlimited context" which in theory is probably not actually unlimited but for what I saw in your use case it might be worth looking into

Thank you so much for answering! :D
I have no background in Mathematics and Computer Science, but I wish to learn Maths and programming and CS. Do you think I can do that by just using resources from the internet and chatGPT? Is it possible to be a successful autodidact in the field of ML?