Recent comments in /f/singularity
TheAnonFeels t1_j661id5 wrote
Reply to Don't despair; there is decent likelihood that an extremely large amount of resources will flow from AGI to the common man (even without UBI) by TheKing01
You make some good points, I agree with most..
However, I think most jobs will be obsolete by the time AGI actually gets created. That's the biggest hurdle i have with the points you made.
Class-Concious7785 t1_j661dk9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Last night I had perhaps the most interesting conversation of my life entirely with a Joseph Stalin chat AI. We discussed hours of philosophy and morals, and it's responses and original questions truly baffled me. Part 1 of the chat log is listed below. by TBabb01
You're saying that using chemical weapons against civilians in colonies is based?
Ortus14 t1_j6605zo wrote
Reply to comment by RobleyTheron in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
The control problem is still an issue. Compute cost decrease by 1000x a decade so, while something like GPT4 may be extremely expensive now, superhuman ASI could be ubiquitous this century, and the first ASI for the company that can afford it, could be reached within the next few decades.
ai_robotnik t1_j6602y5 wrote
Reply to Teachers pet? How about AI's pet by Ashamed-Asparagus-93
The fact is that it would still be a machine, and so any values judgement it makes will be in consideration of designed function. Let's say its function is to identify minds, determine what those minds value, and then satisfy those values, the only factor that is likely to weight its decisions are how easily a particular mind's values are satisfied. And if it's a maximizer, then even that isn't likely to weight its decisions too much since it would still eventually have to get to the harder values.
QLaHPD t1_j65zcvt wrote
Reply to Don't despair; there is decent likelihood that an extremely large amount of resources will flow from AGI to the common man (even without UBI) by TheKing01
Probably the mean user will get some kind of gerenal Siri, not the Skynet.
Smellz_Of_Elderberry t1_j65z1p7 wrote
Reply to If given the chance in your life time, will join a theoretical transhumanist hive mind? by YobaiYamete
No. I have zero interest in losing individuality.
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j65ylme wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in MusicLM: Generating Music From Text (Google Research) by nick7566
Oh yeah, I thought you were referring to the RL one. I didn’t think it was that important.
turnip_burrito t1_j65yfjj wrote
Reply to comment by MassiveIndependence8 in MusicLM: Generating Music From Text (Google Research) by nick7566
[deleted] t1_j65y10i wrote
Reply to comment by Class-Concious7785 in Last night I had perhaps the most interesting conversation of my life entirely with a Joseph Stalin chat AI. We discussed hours of philosophy and morals, and it's responses and original questions truly baffled me. Part 1 of the chat log is listed below. by TBabb01
[deleted]
MassiveIndependence8 t1_j65xqr9 wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in MusicLM: Generating Music From Text (Google Research) by nick7566
Oh you mean the Minecraft model? Yeah I forgot about that one. That’s pretty huge too.
turnip_burrito t1_j65xnaj wrote
Reply to comment by MassiveIndependence8 in MusicLM: Generating Music From Text (Google Research) by nick7566
Adaptive Agent
DeepMind AI. Solves new tasks it hasn't seen before in a virtual environment.
RabidHexley t1_j65xa8n wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Superhuman Algorithms could “Kill Everyone” in Due Time, Researchers Warn by RareGur3157
I have no idea. I'm not saying "if bad people get it we're for sure screwed" just that if we do end up screwed it will be most likely because of bad or misguided people, rather than some inclination to destroy humanity on the AI's part.
DungeonsAndDradis t1_j65w4dm wrote
Reply to comment by theotherquantumjim in Superhuman Algorithms could “Kill Everyone” in Due Time, Researchers Warn by RareGur3157
Imagine a psychopath that's millions of orders of magnitude smarter than the smartest Human.
[deleted] t1_j65w40y wrote
Reply to comment by ScionoftheToad in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
[deleted]
GayHitIer t1_j65vuf7 wrote
Reply to comment by Alex_1729 in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
Aubrey De Grey said LEV could be reached by 2036 with a 50% chance.
Aubrey is probably the most trustworthy guy when it comes to anti age research.
He doesn't sell out or lie about his test results and seems to want the best for humanity. So I trust his prediction.
Yes, cancer will still be a problem, but nanotechnology might solve this down the road.
Though most of our problems could be fixed soon if agi/asi gets made, we will discover new things quicker and quicker.
BenjaminHamnett t1_j65vsk1 wrote
Reply to comment by TheDavidMichaels in If given the chance in your life time, will join a theoretical transhumanist hive mind? by YobaiYamete
Jumped the gun there at the end chatty
BenjaminHamnett t1_j65vd0r wrote
Reply to If given the chance in your life time, will join a theoretical transhumanist hive mind? by YobaiYamete
Already have. If you are on Reddit, you have too. The question is only will you keep accepting upgrades to UI and bandwidth. For the vast majority of people, the answer will be yes. The hold outs will be luddites. Like trying to compete in todays world without a smart phone or electricity, etc
placebogod t1_j65vcy5 wrote
Reply to If given the chance in your life time, will join a theoretical transhumanist hive mind? by YobaiYamete
We are already a part of a hive mind we just don’t know it
turnip_burrito t1_j65vbrs wrote
Reply to comment by RabidHexley in Superhuman Algorithms could “Kill Everyone” in Due Time, Researchers Warn by RareGur3157
If ASI was released to everyone tomorrow, then malicious and good actors would have ASI.
What do you predict the outcome would be?
Caring_Cactus t1_j65ulma wrote
Reply to comment by rixtil41 in If given the chance in your life time, will join a theoretical transhumanist hive mind? by YobaiYamete
That relates to the ego, you think that would have an influence? Being connected would create greater understanding
Alex_1729 t1_j65u3mj wrote
Reply to comment by GayHitIer in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
Well, AI will be able to do that, no? But first, we need to figure out cancer and other diseases, as well as poverty, wars, fundamentalism, idiocy, and all kinds of stuff. I suppose all that falls under the same umbrella.
How did you get to that number?
rixtil41 t1_j65u2t3 wrote
Reply to comment by Caring_Cactus in If given the chance in your life time, will join a theoretical transhumanist hive mind? by YobaiYamete
but being connected is not always a good thing. What will happen to the ones we don't like?
[deleted] t1_j65tw1d wrote
Reply to comment by CandyCoatedHrtShapes in Superhuman Algorithms could “Kill Everyone” in Due Time, Researchers Warn by RareGur3157
[deleted]
kbalint t1_j65t77t wrote
I miss the old android office logo :(
[deleted] t1_j661mgg wrote
Reply to comment by Class-Concious7785 in Last night I had perhaps the most interesting conversation of my life entirely with a Joseph Stalin chat AI. We discussed hours of philosophy and morals, and it's responses and original questions truly baffled me. Part 1 of the chat log is listed below. by TBabb01
[deleted]